posted March 16, 2014 01:46 AM
ed by Chiemi:
Yeah, but "stable" is defined by different things on an individual basis. What one may consider "stable" may not be as concrete as what the next person defines imgt as. Plus, it's still better to at least aim to achieve some form of stability than to just leave things up in the air and regret them later. At least then even if you don't "reach your ultimate goal" you still have some form of a foundation to build off of.
And for me personally, adoption is always an option (and even if I have kids of my own I still may adopt) so I'm not all that concerned with age. Plus with the advancement of technology and surrogate mothers and what not, age is starting to become less of a factor for most people.
And I agree you might not have said "you" as in me, but being who I am personally I saw that it was written right after my post and touched on basically what I said so that's why I replied. Maybe I'm just too observant though.. I hope I'm not coming across as bickery or anything though, just wanted to clarify my pov if it was in fact aimed at my post.[/QUOTE]
I agree that stability is subjective. I never said there was anything wrong with guidelines. Maybe it's just me, but I want to enjoy my kids while I can. I don't wanna be 60 having my first (whether they are adopted or not). To each their own.
Meh I get offended easily.
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
posted March 15, 2014 11:56 PM