Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Is LibraRising accurate?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Is LibraRising accurate?
stargazer21
Knowflake

Posts: 210
From:
Registered: Nov 2012

posted June 14, 2014 02:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for stargazer21     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Does anyone visit that site LibraRising? I've gone on that site a lot to gather some really quick information about celebs and their Natal Placements but when I compare them to Astrotheme...they're just wrong o.O I think she puts up pages for celebs before their birth times come out and she sometimes guesses where their rising signs are. hmm...

IP: Logged

Aries23Degrees
Knowflake

Posts: 530
From: South Africa
Registered: Dec 2012

posted June 14, 2014 01:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aries23Degrees     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As with every site, there is some valuable information therein , but there is also a lot of bias-particularly to certain signs.

The site seems to think very highly of Libra and other masculine Sun sign positions but can be unfairly scathing to feminine sign placements.

If you don't believe me, notice how they "vote" attractive young people as Masculine Ascendants and the older, "less attractive" people as Feminine Ascendants.

The person even uses outdated pics of celebs to illustrate a point on "ugliness" of one Ascendant sign compared to another I really don't like that site.

Its also very ironic that it should be called "Librarising.com" ,and Libra is the sign of equality and fair representation, when the site is anything but that.

IP: Logged

Solar_Leo_Queen
Knowflake

Posts: 1361
From: Planet Earth
Registered: Jan 2014

posted June 14, 2014 02:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Solar_Leo_Queen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Meh I don't trust it. I agree with Aries23Degrees on the part where the site tends to portray masculine signs as more attractive and "better" than feminine signs. That is not always the case. I usually find feminine risings more attractive than masculine ones. But then again, every sign has its positive and negative traits. That site seems to forget to highlight those in each sign. It just focuses more on patronizing some signs more than the others. Although the sign tables in that site, I find to be accurate.

IP: Logged

the89freespirit
Knowflake

Posts: 315
From:
Registered: Jan 2012

posted June 14, 2014 02:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for the89freespirit     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That definitely is a pattern on there. I've noticed that, whenever they don't have a birth time for a celeb, they usually list their "guess" for their Rising sign as Sagittarius, 9 times out of 10. It's kind of funny.

------------------
Check out My Astrology Blog:
http://astroarena12.blogspot.com

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2014

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a