posted August 22, 2014 04:58 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Yanmorg:
There are exceptions to every rule because the Venus in Cancer men I know go for any type really.. and the Venus in Taurud men too.

ALL of the mars in cancer men I know love heavyset women.

---

posted August 22, 2014 05:06 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7thGuardian:
Maybe your Libra is broken. O_o!
You should go to see a doctor about that. Could be something serious. For example: when you go to the bathroom for a Nr. 2 - can you smell the scent of... you know... your poo? Cause Libras - can't smell their own poo. They don't believe themselves capable of squeezing something disgusting out of their butt-hole. I don't know what goes through their mind at that time - but they even try to convince others that... the thing that comes out of their butt - smells like perfume. So... they leave the door to the bathroom open and force you to smell their... poo! (+_+)

---

It does smell like perfume! I'm telling you it does!

Nah, jk, haha.

posted August 22, 2014 05:12 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by mercury89:
Hi, I seen some topics about which Venus sign in men will go for plus-sized women. I read that Cancers and Taurus Venus will go for that kind of ladies.

Now I am curious about which one of them will prefer tiny/ slender, or at least athletic women over plus sized? At least the ones who think it is a priority that their girlfriends should be petite and slender.

This are my personal assumptions:

Capricorn Venus ----> (Tall slender women, long legs and arms, bony face) Kind of a runway model type of body.

What you think?

---

Well I am with a Capricorn Venus and that is not me. I am short not skinny, but not plus sized. Average sized breasts. "Nice butt" (from what I'm told)

He did tell me a long time ago "Don't take this the wrong way but I've never been with a girl that isn't skinny before, and I really liked it."

posted August 22, 2014 05:19 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7thGuardian:
All Godzillas are beautiful!

---

posted August 22, 2014 06:28 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:

It does smell like perfume! I'm telling you it does!

Nah, jk, haha.

And I think the superficial side of Libra is broken, due to my highly aspected Pluto and Mars in Scorpio. Venus also aspects Pluto with a sextile

---

Scorpio - being the next sign following Libra, comes with a lesson for Libras - to go beyond shallow stuff, to dig under the surface - and look at things in depth (as they are under the shale).

As the story goes - the astrological Sign that follows comes with a lesson for the previous Sign. Thus - their nature implies a sense of contraction in relation to each-other.

For example: We have the sign of Leo - who likes to be spoiled like a child - expecting to have everything handed to them on a silver platter - followed by Virgo - who comes with a life lesson about responsibility and the work one must do to survive in this world. But work can be hard and messy - so Libra comes with a lesson in esthetics (beautifying) - as a solution to the messy nature of a Virgo. While Scorpio - tries to teach the Libra that - there's more to life then what lies on the exterior - and sometimes you got go deep inside if you want to find who you are - and same goes for others. And, even though Scorpio has a high focus and good intuition it's a fixed sign - that feel stuck in its small world. So, Sagittarius - as the following sign tries to teach Scorpio how to expand its horizons - cause the personal borders one sets around himself - can jail one in a place of close-mindedness (the curse of fixed signs - if you will).
And so on...

posted August 22, 2014 06:59 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:

It does smell like perfume! I'm telling you it does!

Nah, jk, haha.

And I think the superficial side of Libra is broken, due to my highly aspected Pluto and Mars in Scorpio. Venus also aspects Pluto with a sextile

---

I don't think it is. On your other posts you said you were very picky physically with your partners and you wanted them a certain way. If that's not superficial I don't know what is.

posted August 22, 2014 07:05 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KarkaQueen:

I don't think it is. On your other posts you said you were very picky physically with your partners and you wanted them a certain way. If that's not superficial I don't know what is.

^ I'm just testing you.. I just want to see your response on this one.. I don't dislike you.

---

Yes, I am very picky physically, but you must have missed that I'm picky personality-wise as well. And since everything has to be so specific and detailed for me, there's no way that it's superficial.

I'm a very deep person, and when I'm falsely accused of being superficial I flip because it's far from the truth.

I think saying people are superficial because they care for looks is superficial within itself because they don't stop to think that maybe Natural Selection is a thing, but instead, they follow what everyone else says... and if it sounds "good enough" for them, they will accept that as a notion of being superficial.

posted August 22, 2014 07:10 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7thGuardian:
Scorpio - being the next sign following Libra, comes with a lesson for Libras - to go beyond shallow stuff, to dig under the surface - and look at things in depth (as they are under the shale).

As the story goes - the astrological Sign that follows comes with a lesson for the previous Sign. Thus - their nature implies a sense of contraction in relation to each-other.

For example: We have the sign of Leo - who likes to be spoiled like a child - expecting to have everything handed to them on a silver platter - followed by Virgo - who comes with a life lesson about responsibility and the work one must do to survive in this world. But work can be hard and messy - so Libra comes with a lesson in esthetics (beautifying) - as a solution to the messy nature of a Virgo. While Scorpio - tries to teach the Libra that - there's more to life then what lies on the exterior - and sometimes you got go deep inside if you want to find who you are - and same goes for others. And, even though Scorpio has a high focus and good intuition it's a fixed sign - that feel stuck in its small world. So, Sagittarius - as the following sign tries to teach Scorpio how to expand its horizons - cause the personal borders one sets around himself - can jail one in a place of close-mindedness (the curse of fixed signs - if you will).
And so on...

---

Yup, exactly.

I fully agree with that astrological law.

posted August 22, 2014 07:19 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:
Yes, I am very picky physically, but you must have missed that I'm picky personality-wise as well. And since everything has to be so specific and detailed for me, there's no way that it's superficial.

And I don't get the "I'm just testing you, I just want to see your reply to this one" because you're falsely accusing me of being superficial when I'm not.

---

Yes, you're very concerned with how your partner looks and they must fit your ideal personality completely or you won't be interested. That's the very colloquial definition of superficial. You don't seem to see beauty skin deep.

If you weren't superficial at all you would be attracted to a girl who wasn't much of your type physically but because of the beauty of her soul and your attraction towards it that wouldn't matter to you anyway.

But it does.

posted August 22, 2014 07:19 PM            

But
Venus in Gem/Sag axis
3rd/7th/9th houses

=====================================================================
I don't why many people got butthurt about this, clearly you don't have to.
... but I guess it's a very common way to react.

posted August 22, 2014 07:21 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KarkaQueen:
Yes, you're very concerned with how your partner looks and they must fit your ideal personality completely or you won't be interested. That's the very colloquial definition of superficial. You don't seem to see beauty skin deep.

If you weren't superficial at all you would be attracted to a girl who wasn't much of your type physically but because of the beauty of her soul and your attraction towards it that wouldn't matter to you anyway.

But it does.

Get it?

---

I edited my post. And it doesn't.

And what do you mean I don't seem to see beauty skin-deep? Isn't going for a personality you like as well "skin-deep"?

Oh, so you are saying that I cannot go for looks and only go for personality or it's not seeing beauty skin-deep? Oh, be realistic.

"I'm a very deep person, and when I'm falsely accused of being superficial I flip because it's far from the truth.

I think saying people are superficial because they care for looks is superficial within itself because they don't stop to think that maybe Natural Selection is a thing, but instead, they follow what everyone else says... and if it sounds "good enough" for them, they will accept that as a notion of being superficial.

I don't "only" go for looks. But if I did, I wouldn't call it superficial, but rather "primitive" because they can't see past their primitive brain for Natural Selection."

Following beauty trends is superficial, not physical appearances in general. If you find something attractive physically, it's what you find attractive. But if you only like it because it's seems to be the "new thing" that everyone is raving about, than that's superficial because you don't bother to explore your own personal tastes.

Personal taste is NOT superficial. Regardless if it's physically or personality. Why would I like just any old person? That's not how it works.

posted August 22, 2014 07:33 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:
I edited my post. And it doesn't.

"I'm a very deep person, and when I'm falsely accused of being superficial I flip because it's far from the truth.

I think saying people are superficial because they care for looks is superficial within itself because they don't stop to think that maybe Natural Selection is a thing, but instead, they follow what everyone else says... and if it sounds "good enough" for them, they will accept that as a notion of being superficial.

I don't "only" go for looks. But if I did, I wouldn't call it superficial, but rather "primitive" because they can't see past their primitive brain for Natural Selection."

Following beauty trends is superficial, not physical appearances in general. If that's why you find attractive physically, it's what you find attractive. But if you only like it because it's seems to be the "new thing" that everyone is raving about, than that's superficial because you don't bother to explore your own personal tastes.

---

No. You are NOT superficial for preferring a certain set of looks. I do too! Everyone does. In my opinion, you are superficial for wanting a girl to fit 100 percent in those looks and rejecting anyone who falls slightly below it.

I never accused you of only going for looks, you only go for a certain personality type (all or nothing) with a certain facial type (all or nothing). That is either being extremely unrealistic or really critical with your tastes. That is not being "deep".

posted August 22, 2014 07:48 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KarkaQueen:

No. You are NOT superficial for preferring a certain set of looks. I do too! Everyone does. In my opinion, you are superficial for wanting a girl to fit 100 percent in those looks and rejecting anyone who falls slightly below it.

I never accused you of only going for looks, you only go for a certain personality type (all or nothing) with a certain facial type (all or nothing). That is either being extremely unrealistic or really critical with your tastes. That is not being "deep".

---

Oh. The girl doesn't have to fit 100%. I highly doubt I will be able to be with a girl that has all that anyway, haha. Yes, that's an ideal of mine. It probably (most likely) won't be the outcome with who I end up with, but at least it's a filter to start with.

I won't reject her in a snap because she doesn't have all those qualities, but I would expect her to have a some in order for me to continue on with her any further. Like I said, I'm not going for just anyone.

When someone is being "critical" (whatever it is), they are questioning the face value of what is being presented to them. And accepting what's face value, is superficial. Which I don't do. I question things, and my desires. I already know I won't be able to be with a girl of my ideal of what I am attracted to physically or personalty-wise will not happen and I've accepted that reality. But there is nothing wrong with starting with a filter like I said, and trying, to ensure a higher probability of me being with a girl who has at least some of those qualities/traits that I am attracted to.

posted August 22, 2014 07:58 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:
Oh. The girl doesn't have to fit 100%. I highly doubt I will be able to be with a girl that has all that anyway, haha. Yes, that's an ideal of mine. It probably (most likely) won't be the outcome with who I end up with, but at least it's a filter to start with.

When someone is being "critical" (whatever it is), they are questioning the face value of what is being presented to them. And accepting what's face value, is superficial. Which I don't do. I question things, and my desires. I already know I won't be able to be with a girl of my ideal of what I am attracted to physically or personalty-wise will not happen and I've accepted that reality. But there is nothing wrong with starting with a filter like I said, and trying, to ensure a higher probability of me being with a girl who has at least some of those qualities/traits that I am attracted to.

Some people aren't picky, some people are a bit picky, and some people are really picky. This doesn't make any of those types of people superficial. It all has to do with their state of consciousness to that specific topic at hand, and how "deep" they decide to venture within it.

---

posted August 22, 2014 08:02 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KarkaQueen:
Ok. that's your reality but I still don't agree. Live well. Whatever suits ya best.

---

posted August 22, 2014 08:11 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by hannaramaa:
Leo is pretty masculine and I notice a lot of Venus in Leos like chubbier women.

---

posted August 22, 2014 09:28 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ail221:
Libra venus men like some curves, especially a nice butt.

---

posted August 22, 2014 09:55 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:
I personally don't like curves. I don't like them straight like a stick, though, if that makes sense. And if a "nice butt" means a big butt, then I don't like that either.

---

posted August 22, 2014 10:04 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ail221:
Well how nice for you.

---

Well, I am just giving my personal preference as a Libra Venus.

That's what this thread is about. And you said Libra Venus likes that, and I am one who doesn't, so I thought I'd share so that people don't jump to conclusions that all Libra Venuses like curves because people are saying it on this thread, instead of looking for a common theme between them according to what the people say they like/prefer who have that placement themselves, that's all.