posted August 22, 2014 09:29 PM            

Is anyone willing to share their interpretation on this? I'm not exactly sure what it means.

Thanks

posted August 22, 2014 09:46 PM            

I do know that Venus in Scorpio retrograde signifies a very private and emotionally-guarded individual. A retrograde Venus means that the qualities of his Venus sign will be used within versus directed on their partner.

BUT your boyfriend also has Venus in the 7th house which is the house of open enemies, friends, and relationships so maybe he would actually direct those qualities on you?

I'm just brainstorming..

It might also mean he might only display his Venusian qualities to things related to the 7th house.

He might be outgoing and sociable at his job, for example, but in his relationships, he might be a contradiction because that's when his Retrograde qualities kick in.

Just some thoughts that might get your brain going..

posted August 23, 2014 08:13 AM            

How could not being in touch with Venus aspects manifest?

I am not sure I understand what you mean by
"the qualities of his Venus sign will be used within versus directed on their partner".

What the charts say and what has played out so far don't seem to match. Le sigh

posted August 23, 2014 08:42 AM            

------------------
Want To Ask Any Question About Bible Prophecy? Go For it. It is Free, of course.

posted May 06, 2015 09:45 AM            

With Venus unaspected the lesson would not necessarily be to learn love or learn to love, but to become conscious of the love that is already in them and to surrender to Spirit in order to access that love. They ARE love, they just need to realize it and allow that love to flow through them instead of coming from them.

posted May 06, 2015 10:25 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by twinflame1914:
My partner has unaspected Venus (retrograde) in Scorpio (7th house) in his Natal chart.

Is anyone willing to share their interpretation on this? I'm not exactly sure what it means.

Thanks

---

His life lesson is to learn about love, in all it's forms. He need to learn how to use his social gifts to help promote love to others in his life imo

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted May 06, 2015 12:18 PM            

It is quite likely if you look in the declinations there is a major aspect (parallel or contra-parallel). There is no interpretation for 'unaspected' which is a misnomer anyway, because it assumes a planet must have/make a major aspect in order to be in a 'normal' condition. Total nonsense. In fact, in nearly every case I've looked at such a planet is actually making some minor aspects in longitude and at least one aspect in declination.

Let's stop with the 'unaspected' planet nonsense. There can be no interpretation for a 'non' or 'un-' factor. You can only interpret what IS there, not what supposedly is not.

Look at the whole picture including declinations.

posted May 06, 2015 07:08 PM            

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted May 06, 2015 07:51 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by awakemer:
is a planet unaspected if there are three quintiles and a sesquare?

---

Yes
Minor aspects don't count. The quincunx does not either, nor do aspects to Angles.

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted May 06, 2015 08:14 PM            

I started studying Unaspected Planets because there was very little out there on them, so I studied and studied charts and added to the understanding out there imo

They have a certain nature and if you look for them in chart, you will see!

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted May 09, 2015 02:47 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kannon McAfee:
The interpretation looks at Venus Rx in Scorpio (and house position if you can verify the Asc sign/degree is correct).

It is quite likely if you look in the declinations there is a major aspect (parallel or contra-parallel). There is no interpretation for 'unaspected' which is a misnomer anyway, because it assumes a planet must have/make a major aspect in order to be in a 'normal' condition. Total nonsense. In fact, in nearly every case I've looked at such a planet is actually making some minor aspects in longitude and at least one aspect in declination.

Let's stop with the 'unaspected' planet nonsense. There can be no interpretation for a 'non' or 'un-' factor. You can only interpret what IS there, not what supposedly is not.

Look at the whole picture including declinations.

---