posted September 03, 2014 02:06 AM            

That's something rare. Sagittarians are the least likely to have red hair. They usually have light hair that is more blonde than red.

posted September 03, 2014 02:18 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mercurian Intellect:
Maybe because they want to appear adventurous? And red is kind of a fiery, out-going color.

If you're talking about them having natural red hair though, that's just a coincidence... I was talking about maybe dying it that color to reflect their adventurous, happy go-lucky and fun personality.

---

I mean fake red hair. The real red hair is probably genetic! But I see sooo many sag girls that color their hair red!

posted September 03, 2014 02:24 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by next to neptune:
I mean fake red hair. The real red hair is probably genetic! But I see sooo many sag girls that color their hair red!

And I would lie if I didn't say that it fit them very well! I just get all jealous

---

posted September 04, 2014 08:52 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Canadiangirl:
Uhm..my Mom is a Sag lady and she definitely doesn't have red hair or happy go lucky. She has dark dark brown hair and is a very reserved but happy person.

---

posted September 04, 2014 03:29 PM            

Red hair occurs naturally on approximately 1–2% of the human population.[1] It occurs more frequently (2–6%) in people of northern or western European ancestry, and less frequently in other populations. Red hair appears in people with two copies of a recessive gene on chromosome 16 which causes a mutation in the MC1R protein.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair

But hey, just for the sake of it - here's a list with Sag female celebrities: http://www.librarising.com/astrology/sunsigns/suninsagittariusfemale.html - let's see how many are red-haired.

Hmm, there are 77 Sag females on that list and only 3 of them are "natural read heads" - as in: Agnes Mooreheadm, Susan Dey and Ellen Burstyn. Even if we're to take in consideration the dyed hair - there's probbaly less than a dozen (12).

As for the "Happy Go Lucky Myth (cause it's clearly a myth)" - where most Sag are suppose to be carefree. That's nonsense - as well. There's carefree people under any sign and plenty of miserable Sags. If you look around, you'll find an example even on this forum. There's probbaly more - but one of them is kinda of an extreme version of Unhappy go Unlucky - since in most of her topics she's complaining about something or being a negativist. Myth BUSTED!

Heavily influenced Sags might be more carefree - even happy go lucky (if they move a lot as the story goes - they have a higher chance of finding their luck - compared to those who stick to a certain place for most part of their life) - but like the read-heads those are really rare. Maybe even more rare than the read heads (1 in 10 million or around 700 worldwide). So, it's not like anyone could bump into them on every corner.

posted September 04, 2014 11:06 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7thGuardian:

As for the "Happy Go Lucky Myth (cause it's clearly a myth)" - where most Sag are suppose to be carefree. That's nonsense - as well. There's carefree people under any sign and plenty of miserable Sags. If you look around, you'll find an example even on this forum. There's probbaly more - but one of them is kinda of an extreme version of Unhappy go Unlucky - since in most of her topics she's complaining about something or being a negativist. Myth BUSTED!

---

Wrong. She is just one exception from the populous of the Sagittarius natives (by the way, I don't know who it is).

Sagittarius IS a happy go-lucky sign, as it imparts a positive, adventurous, optimistic and uplifting nature for an individual. While yes, they are philosophical, but unless paired with Scorpio/Pluto energy in their chart, their philosophical nature becomes a bit blind and false to the reality of the individuals in which they share their insight with because it is in no means "deep" and pretty shallow to say the least to that other person's personal needs. What I meant by that is that Sagittarius's Philosophy is not "deep" to the other people specifically, as Sagittarius is more of a beneficial sign universally, and how to improve the meaning of life for everyone (yes, it can be deep in that sense... they can be very deep people philosophically without Scorpio/Pluto energy, but it is more of a broad outlook for the well-being of everyone's moral rights), than per-se specifically/individually for a person like Scorpio/Pluto would be for someone. Sagittarius itself is a carefree sign, as it must be carefree in order to expand the positivity, universally, to inspire people. People do not like seeing reality for what it is... people want there to be "more" to life, and so most people will follow someone who is carefree, positive and optimistic over someone who is always cynically viewing the world for what it is. (Optimism is a lot of times blind because in reality, there truly is no hope in some situations, but it's for the survival or best interest of the individual to be optimistic at times to keep their emotions and/or state of mind under control) ~ (whether it is false hope or truly possible/probable for a positive outcome). So Sagittarius is carefree to the reality of the future's outcome at times, because they will automatically jump on the "optimistic wagon" instead of truly questioning it's realistic probability (this is because they (subconsciously, of course) want to expand positivity, universally (as I said before), and inspire optimism and hope in others - which keeps people motivated to do things, so it does indeed have a practical effect either way). And so if the outcome is negative, Sagittarius won't take it hard or really care much or be disappointed, but rather see it as a "it is what it is" kind of thing, and be ready to be optimistic again about something (they most of the time will) when the times comes because they truly are a happy go-lucky sign.

If they aren't a carefree Sagittarius, then the Sagittarius energy is altered (by reality; how it manifested in that specific individual - due to outside, non-astrological factors) and/or not significant enough in their chart.

Of course there's carefree people under every sign, as other factors of the person's life influenced them so that their astrological influence is canceled out to some extent. But they still carry that base astrological energy/influence with them, but it's more subtle, subconscious and less-demanding/weaker than a person who hasn't been exposed to an environment in their life that caused them to be less like their sign or specific energy in their chart.