posted February 28, 2016 03:11 PM            

If you are asking for decency in such a discussion, that is also a very difficult proposition, since he-who-must-no-be-named has delivered such a broad array of insults, mockery, and various ad hominem attacks against President Obama, fellow Republicans, and virtually every type of American there is (except maybe non-Jewish white folks). People don't like to be insulted without having something to say back.

The 199 People, Places and Things DonaldTrump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

Astrological question: What in his chart indicates a tendency for such communication?

Astrological question: This man's behavior so far fits many of the patterns/strategy of a fascist dictator (more than any US candidate in memorable history). What in his chart would indicate the potential for such leanings, such condescending, authoritarian attitudes?

This man wants the most powerful office in the world. Superficial analysis doesn't cut it. If the analysis is not at least as cutting as his own remarks, then it is not worth any of our time.

quote:

---

"It is not what enters into the mouth that defiles the man, but what proceeds out of the mouth, this defiles the man."
-- Jesus, Matthew 15:11

---

posted February 28, 2016 03:55 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kannon McAfee:

This man wants the most powerful office in the world. Superficial analysis doesn't cut it. If the analysis is not at least as cutting as his own remarks, then it is not worth any of our time.

---

Not just this, the rest of your post also makes a lot of sense.

Astrochologist, Let's say hypothetically - even if people were to come here and say "The person under discussion has xyz traits because of abc placements/aspects.", it would not be taken objectively at all. This has happened in the past. It simply careens off course into a discussion of "He is NOT xyz, we love him." vs "No, he IS xyz, how come you're not seeing it." Etc etc.