Author
|
Topic: Did the Zodiac signs change? Any expert opinions?
|
*Golden_Wing* Knowflake Posts: 116 From: US Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted September 26, 2016 11:06 AM
I apologise if this has been asked a trillion times before. I read an article a week ago that NASA has found a 13th zodiac sign? Can someone with more knowledge please educate me with regards to this subject? Lol. Thank you for your time! IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 1039 From: not here Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted September 26, 2016 11:16 AM
theres 2 different theories on what the signs are, one is that the start of aries point is actually where 2 giant space rings cross and the zodiac begins. those 2 points crossed 2000 years ago at the start of the ram constellation. the other idea is that it doesnt have anything to do with those 2 rings, and that it is merely the stars forming a "picture" which humans themselves have pointed out what they form when really they are just arbitrary. IP: Logged |
Kannon McAfee Knowflake Posts: 1772 From: Portland, OR - USA Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted September 26, 2016 04:28 PM
*Golden_Wing*:No, NASA did not find a 13th zodiac sign. Occasionally, a journalist comes across this 13th-sign idea taken out of historical context and recycles this story. Zodiac signs are not constellations. The confusion starts there. Zodiac signs are space/time cycles of our sun. Our universe operates on a base-12 mathematical/geometric system. There are many more constellations than 12. But there are 12 zodiacal signs. ------------------ The Declinations Guy Rising Sign Descriptions | Expert rectification ♈ ♉ ♊ ♋ ♌ ♍ ♎ ♏ ♐ ♑ ♒ ♓ IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 1039 From: not here Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted September 26, 2016 04:45 PM
space time cycles of our sun? hm. sounds like a vague idea (not insulting). im more of a logical person who sees that everything, every little thing has a source and reason. you dont have any scientific definition. maybe you do have an understanding. dont you think that its the 2 giant rings in space. out of everywhere the zodiac could start. its on the earths equator. exactly where the earth spins. if it was due to the sun and its magnificance alone, the zodiac wouldnt be reliant on the earth's equator to make its beginning.universe operating on base 12 math system. well that is an assumption. it would be nice to have this understanding to see if there really was a "sacred ultimate" kind of number that the universe was basically comprised of or for. but the zodiacs are just one thing. zodiac energy we can say is for sure based on a 12 number system. which in its smaller parts consists of 3 elements, and 4 modalities. creating the 12 as they 3 x 4 = 12. but how about the fibonachi spiral. you could say the universe consists of that. or the number pi. the perfect circle. and i remember reading in lindas book (which i cant say i can verify) is that many things work on a cycle of 9. heart beats or something. many other things that i cant recall so i dont think there is a definite math base "ultimate" system to existence. i think all numbers are as important. just my opinion IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 8336 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 26, 2016 04:46 PM
http://www.evolvingdoor.ca/miscarticles/is-ophiuchus-the-13th-zodiac-sign.htm IP: Logged |