|
Author
|
Topic: The Solar Chart
|
Nine
Moderator Posts: 2636
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009
|
posted September 30, 2016 09:44 PM
  
Hey, Guys.Have you ever looked into Solar Chart placements? Do the planetary positions resonate with your personality? For me it was very revealing. Almost like a hidden second layer to my character. Natal Chart vs Solar Chart. The Natal chart is based on your Time Of Birth. The Solar Chart is based off your Sun Sign. In the NC the first house cusp begins at the Rising/Asc sign. In the SC the first house cusp begins at your Sun sign, all planetary placements will fall from this position. Eg. I'm Gemini, Virgo Asc, with Venus+Mars in Taurus. In my Natal Chart Venus & Mars are in the 8th & 9th houses. In my Solar Chart both are in the 12 house. Just, WOW!! #itfits Has anyone looked at this before? What are your impressions? IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 70467
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 01, 2016 03:26 PM
Bump!IP: Logged |
soren
Knowflake Posts: 1213
From: not here
Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted October 02, 2016 04:19 PM
hmm.. for a solar chart EG a set of signs stemming from the cross points of the ecliptic with the sun to exist, it would mean that sun crossing there, sort of stems out from it an energy. like when the giant space rings cross (ecliptic, celestial) they create the zodiac. for the sun though- i may be wrong, but it seems like it wouldnt create an energy ALL the way around our planet. the ecliptic on its own might- but then why are the zodiac signs reliant on 2 giant rings to mark where they start? EG where they cross creates the first sign, aries. which rules the head, meaning it comes first even to us humans (who knows libra or virgo could have came first, since they are both near the crossing points.) (and based off my progressions that i experienced aries does definitely rule the brain/head because i gained emphasis or lost emphasis in that area) so since the sun is merely one GIANT point, on a ring, i dont see it sparking a whole other zodiac like solar signs suggest.
it is the second ring, that wraps around all entirely, that ensures this zodiac energy is created. the sun doesnt wrap around
 IP: Logged |
soren
Knowflake Posts: 1213
From: not here
Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted October 02, 2016 04:47 PM
if it truly is possible that you only need one point on a giant ring to create the zodiac (sun + eclliptic) then that would mean aries point is one point. and libra point would act as another aries point (since they are 2 points both crossing a giant ring, ignoring the whole celestial sphere, and just focus on how it only needs, if this "solar signs" theory is true, it only needs ONE point crossing/existing on any giant given ring to stem a whole new set of signs)so you'd have to ask if all librans are firey. if all taureans are emotionally deep and intuitive. if all leos are very thoughtful to what others are thinking, thinking much, being humanitarean. if all geminis are ruled by the thighs. since if discluding the ring of the celestial, if all it takes is one crossing point to stem a whole new set of signs, then libra point is where the "aries point" creates libra in its own zodiac, but aries point would be where libra point's zodiac has libra. a bit confusing. so yeah does it take 2 giant rings circling us to create the zodiac. or not?
IP: Logged |
Nine
Moderator Posts: 2636
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009
|
posted October 03, 2016 09:29 AM
Well, newspaper horoscope is based off the Solar Chart. The better astrologers advise we also read for the Asc sign to get abetter perspective of the month's transits.This is why I think the Solar Chart has merit. Additionally, the Solar Chart is a more accurate mirror of the solar system at birth than the Natal Chart. IMO, the Natal Chart is a more private/personal chart. While the Solar Chart is what's visible to the world. IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
