posted October 31, 2016 03:03 PM            

and then there's times for me, where im like eh, not sure.

eh im not sure. eh im not sure maybe.

But then i actually do it the right way. and then im like 😮 i can see it 100% no doubt! its sure!!

posted October 31, 2016 03:07 PM            

most of you like to believe in fantasy. trust me. astrology isnt fantasy or fiction.

posted October 31, 2016 03:40 PM            

well first there is logic for the day for a year method.

posted October 31, 2016 03:45 PM            

thats the day for a year. primary directions, which goes by the minutes and hours after you were born, is the time the baby opens its eyes, and it goes by the belief that either your mind is adapting at a incredibly fast pace and exponentially slows down, which is what primary directions takes account for,

OR

your mind's absorption of astrological phenomena, which apparently wouldn't be related to your brain/neurons/eelectricity in ANY way, because it would assume the rate at which you absorb the energy, is constant, even for 60 days (wrong)

posted October 31, 2016 03:55 PM            

as we know now from the thread of asc= birth time. that.

the natal starts at birth. when the baby leaves the womb. but what else happens. the baby opens its eyes. it uses the brain.

why didn't the baby take the natal chart inside the womb?

what is the only thing that is different. why would just "physically being outside of the womb" increase or "start" the astrological effects?

there doesnt seem to be anything major about htat. the physical locaiton of the baby.

Oh i think i got something. its cause the baby starts using its brain!!

Why doesnt a 60 year old man get a new chart every day. you know. if the birth time didnt matter. then why not get a new chart every day. he keeps the chart for his whole life. from the time his BRAIN started being wired electronnically to the cosmos.

so if any of you do think it MIGHT ¿? have ANYTHING to do with the BRAIN which is when the baby opens its eyes for the first time. THAT MEANS...

well you'd have to ask yourself... how fast does the babys first initial behaviours, feelings, brain usage, how speedy is it, and when does it get a fixed state.

you have to ask yourself.. is the babys brain being hardwired/adapting as fast on its 30th day, as it is on the first day, as it sees its mother/parent for the first time? as its taking in reality for the very first time, is it learning and melding its brain to reality as much in those first minutes/hours, as it is on its 30th day?

what? it isnt is it.