posted November 03, 2016 10:28 AM            

Scorpios. All of them. I have many pictures. I chose the 5th house for them. See there are 3 'potential' house systems. I meticulously coordinated results of having a scorpio with their sun in 5th in placidus, but the 4th in equal for one set.

and with the contrasting set, one was in 5th in placidus (sun was within the house borders) and it was also in the 5th for where the 5th house would be in the equal house system. Furthermore, i am not merely following instructions of where the house borders should be. Based off logic, the equal house system should be nearly as they are. I am not following rules, but using math and logic.

These (above) are all 5th placidus sun's and also 5th in the potential equator house system. They are 4th house in equal houses. It works best if you keep looking around quickly to each one for 1/4 of a second look around everyone and after suddenly switch to the images below

To me there might be a slight difference. It's hard to tell but earlier it seemed pretty apparent. So what I didn't add yet is that the top two rows of this ^picture (for your own research) all have their sun's in the 5th in all 3 house systems.
The bottom two rows however, have their sun in the 5th in placidus and equal houses, but not in the equatorial system. Instead they all have it in the 6th in the equatorial house system. What I find quite interesting about it is, and many of you might be also in my same boat, is that my progressed ascendant is 100% sure in pisces/virgo. (you times your age by about 1.3-1.6, and then add that number in degrees to your ascendant. Ex. 15 yr old, natal asc 10 aqua. 15x1.4=21. progressed asc = 1 degree pisces as a somewhat close estimate). I noticed that I am much more interested in the signs on my progressed ascendant than my natal, and I always was. I have a high amount of interest in the bottom two rows, and I don't particularly find anything that wonderful about the top two rows.

So that isn't proof, but it's something, besides that just the look in their eye might have more virgo, earthiness, sharpness.

posted November 03, 2016 11:38 AM            

and as i still look at the bottom rows, that attraction is still there for nearly all. still have no interest in the top two rows.

and the 1st picture, after staring at the bottom picture for about a minute then looking at it, i do think that there is a slight shift to the 4th house.

i "feel" the whole, and definitely get a more "downed" depressed vibe from the first picture, after looking at the others.

posted November 03, 2016 11:40 AM            

maybe i'll add a picture of people with sun in 5th in equal houses and equator houses, but 4th in placidus.

posted November 03, 2016 07:40 PM            

the first picture- cancer's in equal house (4th). they have huge shadows on their faces. its just that the expression and who they are inside makes you focus on shadows. and the curves of their head/cheeks are much more noticeable. the lighting.

the next one down if you compare indiviuals of that set, with one individual (same gender for best results maybe) from the set above. and each time ask "is this person more leonine?"

every time i did it, the set below was more leonine. And im pretty sure it's not just cause im trying to see that.

finally, the next set below which is a showance of the equator+horizon house set, they all scream that they are more virgoan. when you meet with their eyes you can sense and feel like you are looking at a physical being.

so before this was all just theories. i know most of you probably will never know what i'm seeing.

but i finally figured it out.