Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Duad vs dwad

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Duad vs dwad
Vixen
Knowflake

Posts: 336
From:
Registered: Apr 2015

posted January 28, 2017 07:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Vixen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hey guys! For last few weeks I got quite interested in duad/dwad charts. What do you think is more accurate?
Dwads (for example when first 2°30 of Taurus belong to Taurus, second to Gemini and in Leo first 2°30 belong to Leo, second to Virgo, third to Libra etc. )?
Or Duads (in every single sign, first 2°30 belong to Aries, second to Taurus, third to Gem etc. )?

IP: Logged

soren
Knowflake

Posts: 2942
From: a can
Registered: Sep 2012

posted January 28, 2017 08:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for soren     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dwads: (or the def's might be vice versa not sure officialy)are like this:

Taurus Sign:
Taurus, -> Gemini->Cancer and so on finishing at the sign before taurus, aries. Contains 12 2.5°d Dwads.

Now duad:
Taurus Sign:
first 2.5°d is Aries-> Taurus-> gemini and finishes at pisces.

what does it take to complete a full zodiac? it takes 2 giant rings around you. the sun's daily path, and the equator. is one.

it takes 2 rings to make a zodiac. so does it make sense that 1 sign would not have a complete zodiac in it, but be it's own part. the signs aries taurus gemini all the way to end with pisces. the rings create that it is one full set. the sign aquarius is not a complete zodiac set, it is a fraction of a full set, therefore it is it's own part. it is not a full, it is just a fraction, therefore it contains it's own energy.

therefore the zodiac does not repeat in each sign, because each sign does not contain 2 giant rings which creates the zodiacs and that is what is needed for a full zodiac. each sign is a small component, and incomplete component. therefore it makes sense that it would form individual components, and not 12 more completed ones. starting from aries to pisces in each sign is like a completed zodiac, where as that does not reflect the whole because the whole is a complete circle.

IP: Logged

Vixen
Knowflake

Posts: 336
From:
Registered: Apr 2015

posted January 28, 2017 08:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Vixen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So you're basically saying duads and dwads are nonsense? Did I understood it well? (I'm not attacking you, just politely asking. A lot of people think I'm attacking them...damn Pluto on Scorpio ASC...)

IP: Logged

soren
Knowflake

Posts: 2942
From: a can
Registered: Sep 2012

posted January 28, 2017 08:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for soren     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
no explaining the logic in favor of 1 of the 2 i'll let you figure which one for fun (puzzle mind game)

IP: Logged

Vixen
Knowflake

Posts: 336
From:
Registered: Apr 2015

posted January 28, 2017 10:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Vixen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, it seems you do prefer dwads then

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2017

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a