posted April 07, 2020 01:24 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Thanks, Hipa. Yes, there are MANY positive sides of the present world's occurrences. It feels as if god has grounded us all and forced us to reconsider how we treat each other - human to human and human to animals.'
Passive connectivity INDEED! It's because in this we are all equal for once, we can relate.

---

posted April 07, 2020 02:22 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Thanks, Hipa. Yes, there are MANY positive sides of the present world's occurrences. It feels as if god has grounded us all and forced us to reconsider how we treat each other - human to human and human to animals.'
Passive connectivity INDEED! It's because in this we are all equal for once, we can relate.

---

posted April 07, 2020 02:28 PM            

Humans are wired to react in panic bc is a survival mechanism, fight or flight, staying at home is an example of flight I feel.

But then you think how this was all originally to avoid overflowing the hospitals but then quarantine is lasting a while so maybe we are supposed to transition soon to targeted quarantine once we have enough tests to be able to conduct aggressive testing measures.

Perhaps this is why they went about it this way, full on quarantine, bc we were NOT prepared to go about it the better way which would be doing targeted quarantines and very aggressive testing and or because we did not react promptly to the crisis.

posted April 07, 2020 03:02 PM            

"Appearing Monday on AM 1030 KVOI Radio, Dr. Robert Redfield, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), predicted that the death toll from the Chinese coronavirus will be “much, much, much lower” than the models have projected due to Americans following social distancing recommendations."
http://www.breitbart.com/health/2020/04/07/cdc-director-coronavirus-death-toll-will-be-much-much-much-lower-than-projected/

So maybe we did handle it well, but just a day or two ago I read that this was going to peak this month here in the USA and to expect the death rate to go up a lot.

posted April 07, 2020 06:13 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by hypatia238:
Belage you were probably right about this been handled poorly and maybe we were supposed to do aggressive targeted quarantine from the start and aggressive testing, Tucker Carlon was talking about this very diplomatically but bravely yesterday and I thought of you and how I felt you could be right when you brought this up a while ago.

Humans are wired to react in panic bc is a survival mechanism, fight or flight, staying at home is an example of flight I feel.

But then you think how this was all originally to avoid overflowing the hospitals but then quarantine is lasting a while so maybe we are supposed to transition soon to targeted quarantine once we have enough tests to be able to conduct aggressive testing measures.

Perhaps this is why they went about it this way, full on quarantine, bc we were NOT prepared to go about it the better way which would be doing targeted quarantines and very aggressive testing and or because we did not react promptly to the crisis.

I think this variable of how easy this virus spreads has taken us all by surprise and made us feel uncertain around how to best handle and approach this and caused us to not react promptly.

---

Would love to see a link to Tucker Carlson thoughts if you happen to have it.

Yes, I think that originally, my thoughts were that if a virus tends to kill a specific demographic, in this case, (older and with co-morbidities and immune disorders). it would have been ideal to promote and encourage self-quarantine of that demographic, instead of locking down the whole population and sinking the entire economy. I mean it is already happening now, with stores offering senior hours for shopping. They are acknowledging that certain segments of the population are more at risk and should not shop when other demographics are shopping.

In practical terms, I am no longer sure it would have been possible though since we were not globally prepared to deal with this. No country was prepared. But moving forward this would be something I suspect policy makers will think worth considering if we get another pandemic that targets a particular demographic.

posted April 19, 2020 05:35 PM            

Ernest Whilhem was a western trained astrologer who decided to study vedic and has become quite an authority in his field.

Why is 2020 this Way and When will it End?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB_9-5VH70g

His take on Jupiter in Capp was pretty enlightening.

I love his examination of the eclipses and how they affect our world affairs. I have been fascinated with eclipses for years and whenever something major happens in world affairs, I always go looking for the previous eclipses and the ones coming right after. Because they usually hold the key.