|
Author
|
Topic: MAN ON THE MOON
|
braveheart
Knowflake Posts: 127
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 08:39 PM
 
Does anyone think that the moon landing was fake? And if so, why?
There are a lot of inconsistencies in the photos. I would like to read what everybody thinks. IP: Logged |
PeaceAngel
Knowflake Posts: 3734
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 08:47 PM
Oh, I love this question. I was thinking about this yesterday. I think it's real, but am interested in the opposite view too.IP: Logged |
DepTaurus
Knowflake Posts: 1044
From: canada
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 08:55 PM
i kinda think its real i wasnt born at all when it happened. but i dont know what technology was back then but i kinda think its real.braveheart why do yoou think its fake. IP: Logged |
Lara
Knowflake Posts: 4147
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 09:03 PM
Yeah
FAKEjust like 9/11, WMD in Iraq, trying to find Bin Laden, swine flu, AIDS, vaccinations and all the other crap the US insists is reality! All lies.
IP: Logged |
braveheart
Knowflake Posts: 127
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 11:07 PM
DepTaurusWell, I don't know if it is fake, because I wasn't there. The main things that make me think that it is faked are: The flag fluttering in the breeze.
The shadows are at different angles.
A pic of Buzz facing the camera,with
the sun behind him. The front of him
should be in shadow, but it's not.
The flag and moon buggy should still
be on the moon. No satellite pics of
moon show them.
And why hasn't NASA set up a base on
the Moon?
IP: Logged |
songwriter
Knowflake Posts: 319
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 19, 2009 11:30 PM
The real question is: Why did they feel the need to lie??Pyramids in the Moon?! - YouTube video. IP: Logged |
SunChild
Moderator Posts: 818
From: Melbourne. Victoria. Australia
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 20, 2009 01:10 AM
What Lara Said.  IP: Logged |
PeaceAngel
Knowflake Posts: 3734
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 20, 2009 02:12 AM
Lara & SunchildCan you give your reasons why? Not just the moon landing, but 9/11 etc. I'm really interested. Thanks. IP: Logged |
DepTaurus
Knowflake Posts: 1044
From: canada
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 20, 2009 09:06 AM
good points braveheart yeah why didnt they set a base on the moon. IP: Logged |
Deux*Antares
Knowflake Posts: 812
From: I am where I am and it's enough.
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 20, 2009 10:52 AM
There are structures on the moon that were made by other beings (I won't say aliens because maybe they're on their native soil. LOL). That is what an expert remote viewer (psychic spy) said. This is how RV is done: the remote viewer is given a set of coordinates then he "goes" psychically and reports what he is seeing in real time. Coordinates are given in order to not influence the RV person and to prevent him from creating images based on his imagination. It was only after the session was done that he found out that the place he surveyed was the moon. He has RV'd other places outside earth and his findings have been confirmed correct. Information like these are hidden from us to "protect" us.   I believe that this guy is telling the truth. I've studied RV and all I can say is that it's impossible to hide things from a good RV practitoner. Even stuff buried underground are not exempt. Humans possess exceptional abilities that make them able to go to any point in space/time. ------------------
Be humble, but not weak. IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 1879
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 20, 2009 11:37 PM
Yeah, the word on the street is that space aliens from Vega 4, who are the true Vegans have a base on the moon and claimed the moon as their sovereign territory.Since they warned President Kennedy not to attempt a landing on the moon; the whole thing was filmed in the Nevada desert by Warner Bros studios. IP: Logged |
koiflower
Knowflake Posts: 1890
From: Australia
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 07:07 AM
Aliens live on the dark side   Oops, correction! Sorry Deux - they are on native soil...!!! Apparently, there is a building on the Moon and NASA or FBI or CIA (?) have blurred its image...... IP: Logged |
Lara
Knowflake Posts: 4147
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 07:30 AM
More man in the mirror than man on the moon it just looks desperately fake and 911 was an inside job - no doubt about that. Controlled demolition I believe they call it. IP: Logged |
pire
Knowflake Posts: 1356
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 08:19 AM
I don't know if the moon landing was fake or if it was filmed in the nevada desert. But I'm sure there is a lot more to know about all this.
IP: Logged |
Lara
Knowflake Posts: 4147
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 08:26 AM
I heard it was filmed in the nevada desert too... in fact when i recce'd the nevada desert for a photoshoot we came across a huge fenced off area in the middle of nowhere! It had "keep oout" warning signs all over it and a local said it was for Alien Research IP: Logged |
pire
Knowflake Posts: 1356
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 08:29 AM
But then, are they the same as the shapeshifters who are supposed to be around since forever and one day?No need for tv these days. IP: Logged |
pire
Knowflake Posts: 1356
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 09:24 AM
Isn't it surreal? We are debating if the elite, chosen BY the people, did lie to the whole humanity about
1) aliens
2) that humans went on the moon...I mean...? About the Nevada, could it be rumours created by those same "representatives" of people? Rumours So they can descredit later anyone who believe in aliens from the moon? I mean, if those on the moon were cool (meaning spiritually advanced) while humans in power want total control, (associates with shapeshifters?? Anyway) well, to discredit those who believe in the mooners and the mooners themselves so that when some of us start to get "acquainted" we get scared, or confused, or mistrustful or anything like that, they would have to make sure that we cannot trust informations about the mooners. And by spreading rumours that it was shot in Nevada, a schism already happen between the believers of Nevada's story and the believers of the travel to the moon story. Then, mistrust happens. Either of the source, or of their existence, or of their intentions..
If they want to use humans, they can't be spiritual, and if they are spiritual, they won't direct us... IP: Logged |
SunChild
Moderator Posts: 818
From: Melbourne. Victoria. Australia
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 08:14 PM
PA... I spent a long time researching and it's just a personal opinion I keep to myself most of the time. I hardly think about it any more really. And to be honest I can't be bothered posting stuff on it any more. Been there done that. I'm tired. Truly. Lara, do the honors?The information is out there. IP: Logged |
Writesomething
Knowflake Posts: 1304
From: meet me in montauk
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 08:20 PM
i dont believe 99 percent of things i read or hear...and not because im a conspiracy freak, because i hardly am...i just dont trust what im told im suppose to believe. nobody knows the real story to anything.IP: Logged |
Lara
Knowflake Posts: 4147
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 21, 2009 09:41 PM
So figure it out for yourself then WriteSomething... if you want the truth it's easy to find and it's much better that way cos then you believe it
hahaha IP: Logged |
PeaceAngel
Knowflake Posts: 3734
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 22, 2009 05:35 AM
I've read some of the theories, and other variants. I was just curious as to what makes people believe one over the other.IP: Logged |
braveheart
Knowflake Posts: 127
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 22, 2009 05:49 AM
Songwriter: that's really interesting. if there are pyramids on the moon, how did the egyptians know about it? did aliens come to earth and teach them. FYI: i love conspiracies. IP: Logged |
SunChild
Moderator Posts: 818
From: Melbourne. Victoria. Australia
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 22, 2009 07:02 AM
I think it's the amount of convincing evidence to trigger that "aha" moment. If you get enough of it on either side, it'll do it, depending on the bias of the person. True research and evidence however, while being open to the possibility of being wrong (which is hard if one has emotional investments into theories), will prove to be a worthwhile endeavor. IP: Logged |
Choc
Knowflake Posts: 140
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 22, 2009 09:54 AM
No.Conspicary theories can be a fun read but overall, they're a waste of time.
They say that some people are willing to believe anything, but the same thing applies to conspiracists as well. There are people out there that think China doesn't really exist, can you believe that?
Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz51eL0Y
Mythbusters Moon Footprint Hoax http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5taIxlNA_Lw
Mythbusters Moonwalk hoax http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE4w2MIYhC4
Mythbusters Moon flag waving hoax http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8
IP: Logged |
songwriter
Knowflake Posts: 319
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 22, 2009 10:14 AM
What evidence do the Fake Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists have?
The evidence and ideas put forward by the Fake Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists include the following:
No Plans for return trips
Images show that Stars were missing from the black lunar sky
Absence of engine noise in official NASA footage - how was it possible to clearly hear the voices of the Astronauts?
No Blast Crater under the LEM after the powerful engines had been fired
Astronauts Footprints - How was it possible for footprints to be left undisturbed and without dust
American Flag was waving - how is this possible when there is no air on the moon
Pictures of the ascent of the LEM - images appear to show that the LEM was jerked up, as if by a cable, there was no evidence of an exhaust plume
Grainy, Unclear images although technology at the time could have produced much clearer images - Did NASA intentionally make the images hard to see?
Still Photographs - Cameras were fitted to the Astronauts chest - there was no view finder and photographs could only be taken by movement of the body but 1000's of flawless photographs were taken
Crosshairs on Still Photographs - The crosshairs on the photographs could only be on the top of images but pictures of the Astronauts and the Flag clearly show that the crosshairs were partially obscured, beneath the images
Shadows - The only source of light on the moon was the Sun but shadows were cast in multiple directions
Lighting - Images of Astronauts were brightly lighted although their positions would have clearly been in shadow. Some images indicate that the Astronauts appeared to be in spotlight
Backgrounds - the backdrops or the moonscape of some images appear to be identical although NASA stated that the images were taken at different times and locations which were over 2 miles apart
The Van Allen Radiation Belt - Could the Astronauts survive travelling through the deadly radiation belt which is situated 500 miles above the earth and is 1000's of miles thick with only the protection from their space suits and the thin covering of the space ship when it is estimated that 6 feet of lead would be necessary would have been needed. None of the Astronauts have since showed any signs of radiation poisoning
No other manned mission has gone through the Belt
Silencing - It seems unreasonable that information would not have been leaked about any such hoax - theorists therefore believe that key witnesses, including members of the Astronaut Corps, were deliberately silenced. Between 1964 and 1967 10 astronauts died in accidents - 15% of the corps. Facts and Info about the Fake Moon Landing The Moon landing was not fake. The video and photos were fake.
Something's up there and they just dont want us to know about it. The Hour has drawn near and the moon has split. (Qur'an, 54:1)
If this verse is examined in the light of "abjad" method:
Numerological Calculations (Abjad): Hijri: 1390, Gregorian: 1969 ! 1969 Moon Landing & The Quran. IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
