Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Carter says Obama row is 'racist' (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Carter says Obama row is 'racist'
lalalinda
Moderator

Posts: 245
From: nevada
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 11:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lalalinda     Edit/Delete Message
Jimmy Carter: "There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president"
Former US President Jimmy Carter says much of the vitriol against President Barack Obama's health reforms and spending plans is "based on racism".

Mr Carter told a public meeting there was "an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president".

Republican lawmaker Joe Wilson was rebuked on Tuesday in a House vote.

He shouted "You lie!" while Mr Obama was delivering an address on healthcare to Congress last Wednesday.

The House resolution of disapproval described it as "a breach of decorum".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8258011.stm

Jwhop

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 11:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
funny how many people always make things a race issue, even when it clearly isn't.

the fact spreak for themselves. what he was saying was a lie. although it was poor taste to point it out during his speech, his statement was true.


albeit - no more poor taste than bussing that chicago style mob group acorn into town hall meetings with our tax dollars..

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1782
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 12:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
i don't think it was a lie. the bill excludes illegal aliens, period. and it's not even a bill yet!

it was a publicity grab more than anything else, another ridiculous discreditation attempt by people who could be dealing with any number of more relevant/urgent questions.

whether it was racist or not i dunno. don't know the man though i hear he has made plenty of racist comments/ associations in the past. he's playing this for all the political capital he can get out of it. you know, no publicity is bad publicity...

however his opponent (other congressional candidate/dem)seems to be attracting a lot of support in the wake of his outburst.
there are plenty of places where he could have said the same thing but not so many people would have listened/paid attention. like a spoilt brat who goes for negative attention rather than not get ANY. for example, had you ever heard of joe wilson before this week?

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
it excludes illegal aliens, but the part where they had safegaurds or check points in place to prevent that was voted down. so it might read like that, but in reality, there are no safegaurds to ensure it will happen and no filter if you will to prevent it from happening

i could set a 11pm curfew,but if i don't enforce it, it is just a family joke, not a rule. yeah, i will be home by 11pm, right.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 1419
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 01:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

Yes...there are lot of people that don't want a president that's part black. There are lot of people that even think that he's muslim too.

However,I don't think that Wilson was being racist

but he really disrespected President Obama,and I think that it's highly uncalled for. Other presidents weren't disrespected like that in the past.

This is something that I read online

Ku Klux Klowns

Tuesday 15 September 2009

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Columnist

How many white, middle-aged, overweight, ****** -off right-wingers does it take to unscrew a light bulb?

Depends on who you ask.

Organizers for this past weekend's anti-Obama protest in Washington, DC, were slinging around crowd-size estimates of two million people before the curtain was thankfully drawn on the thing, despite the fact that the number was actually in the tens of thousands. They were in the nation's capitol, so they said, to protest against too much governmental control over the lives of Americans, to protest taxation in general, to screech about birth certificates, to denounce President Obama and to see and be seen amid a throng of fat, white people who look just like them.

Call it a group hug for the demonstrably deranged. But there was more to it than just standard-issue anti-Obama sentiments being aired in the streets. Layered beneath the whole scene was a hard vein of bitter racism the participants didn't even try to hide.

"Packs of taxpayer marchers shuffled down Pennsylvania Avenue proudly waving signs," wrote author and political analyst Earl Ofari Hutchinson. "'The Long Legged Mack Daddy,' 'Where's the Birth Certificate,' 'Mississippi Freedom Riders,' 'Whoa Boys Take it from Here' (Obama waving to black and Islamic militants). Many defiantly waved Confederate flags and the Texas state flag (separatist movement emblem). Meanwhile, South Carolina senator Jim DeMint, Congresspersons Mike Pence, Phil Gingrey and Marsha Blackburn, and organizer mouthpiece scandal-plagued former House majority leader Dick Armey profusely swore that the march had nothing to do with race, politics, or even President Obama. The racist flags, symbols and signs, though, gave big lie to their profuse denials. Racism was on full and ugly display on the Capitol Mall. No attempt was made to mask it. Some protesters seemed quite proud to openly send a message about race and Obama."

The Agonist blog provided the following sharp analysis of the overall meaning behind the DC protest this weekend: "These teabag parties represent the newly disenfranchised white, rural voter - the backbone of the Republican Party and its southern strategy. The outburst this week by Rep. Joe Wilson, the obscure South Carolina Congressman who called President Obama a liar during his speech to a joint session of Congress, was prompted by Obama's statement that nothing in the healthcare reform package he is proposing would provide care for illegal immigrants. The fear of immigrants is a primal constant in American politics, but since the adoption of the southern strategy, this fear is at its core a racial concern. Immigration in the past 30 years is no longer about poor white people coming from Europe, it's about brown people coming from Mexico. Now that an African-American is president, protests against illegal immigrants can be a respectable way for people to say what is really on their mind - they cannot accept a black person as president."

Amusing aside regarding Representative Wilson and his rude outburst: "In 2003, Wilson voted to provide federal funds for illegal immigrants' health care. The vote came on the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which contained Sec. 1011 authorizing $250,000 annually between 2003 and 2008 for government reimbursements to hospitals who provide treatment for uninsured illegal immigrants. The program has been extended through 2009 and there is currently a bipartisan bill in Congress to make it permanent."

Well, nobody said you have to be smart in order to become a hero to the far right. In fact, it helps to be dumber than a sack of hair, if only to match wits with the kind of people who were marching this weekend holding signs that read "Bury Obamacare With Kennedy." Stay classy, GOP.

To be fair, not everyone in the Republican Party was thrilled with the nauseating display of hatred and unabashed racism in DC this weekend. Several of the GOP's leading lights have raised deep concerns about the party being overtaken by these insane idiots. "Such insiders point to theories running rampant on the Internet," reported The Los Angeles Times on Monday, "such as the idea that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is thus ineligible to be president, or that he is a communist, or that his allies want to set up Nazi-like detention camps for political opponents. Those theories, the insiders say, have stoked the GOP base and have created a "purist" climate in which a figure such as Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) is lionized for his 'You lie!' outburst last week when Obama addressed Congress. They are 'wild accusations and the paranoid delusions coming from the fever swamps,' said David Frum, a conservative author and speechwriter for President George W. Bush who is among the more vocal critics of the party base and of the conservative talk show hosts helping to fan the unrest. 'Like all conservatives, I am concerned about this administration's accumulation of economic power,' Frum said. 'Still, you have to be aware that there's a line where legitimate concerns begin to collapse into paranoid fantasy.'"

Frum was being nice, actually, because he knows better than anyone what took place in Washington this weekend. It was a Klan rally minus the bedsheets and torches. These people don't even have enough shame to hide their faces anymore. If more Republicans like Frum don't come forward to denounce such activities from their right flank, that right flank is going to finish the job of taking over the GOP, and hard as it is to believe, this kind of obnoxious craziness is going to seem quaint by comparison to what will be coming next.
http://www.truthout.org/091509R

Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

- Eckhart Tolle

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1412
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 02:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
it excludes illegal aliens, but the part where they had safegaurds or check points in place to prevent that was voted down. so it might read like that, but in reality, there are no safegaurds to ensure it will happen and no filter if you will to prevent it from happening

Actually, there was an enforcement mechanism, so indeed it was Joe Wilson who was lying, not the President.

Immigrants and Insurance

September 11, 2009
Several readers have e-mailed us about a report from the Congressional Research Service that they say proves illegal immigrants will have coverage under the proposed House health care plan. In fact, that report says exactly what we concluded yesterday: The bill does not provide coverage for illegal immigrants, but there’s no enforcement mechanism explicitly specified. The newly created Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for deciding how applicants for the affordability credits would need to prove their eligibility.

The CRS report states, as we have reported, that section "246 would bar unauthorized aliens from receiving any premium or cost-sharing credit." It goes on to address the Republican objections we wrote about in our article on Obama’s health care speech:

    CRS, Aug. 25: Some have expressed concerns that since H.R. 3200 does not contain a mechanism to verify immigration status, the prohibitions on certain noncitizens (e.g, nonimmigrants and unauthorized aliens) receiving the credits may not be enforced. However, others note that under §142(a)(3) of the bill, it is the responsibility of the Health Choices Commissioner (Commissioner) to administer the “individual affordability credits under subtitle C of title II, including determination of eligibility for such credits.” Thus, it appears, absent of a provision in the bill specifying the verification procedure, that the Commissioner would be responsible for determining a mechanism to verify the eligibility of noncitizens for the credits.

The Health Choices Commissioner would also be responsible for deciding how and whether credits should be administered to families where some members are unauthorized and others are not, for example a family where a child is born on American soil to a citizen and an unauthorized immigrant spouse.

CRS also found that the bill technically requires illegal immigrants to obtain health insurance, but that’s hardly a benefit and certainly not a cost to taxpayers. In fact, under this interpretation, they could be fined if they fail to obtain it. This is because there is no language distinguishing legal from illegal immigrants in the category of "resident aliens," who are defined for purposes of federal income tax laws as those who have lived in the U.S. at least 31 days in the previous year and 183 days in the previous three years.

The House bill also contains no restrictions on undocumented immigrants buying insurance policies through the new Health Insurance Exchange if they are not already covered. However, they would have to buy it at their own expense, not with any subsidies paid for by taxpayers, just as they do now. In fact, millions of illegal immigrants have private health insurance now. As we”ve written before, about half of undocumented immigrants already have coverage, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center (those who don’t have insurance are usually in jobs that don’t offer it). They receive no government funds for this and cost the taxpayers nothing – and that wouldn’t change under the proposed bill.

If the exchange includes a federal option, illegal immigrants could also participate under the current House bill. But again, this is a matter of paying for their own insurance out of pocket, not receiving taxpayer funds – the federal option is government-administered, but it is not government-subsidized except through the "affordability credits" that the bill says may not be paid to illegal immigrants.

Update, Sept. 12: White House offocials told reporters late on Sept 11 that the president now favors requiring require proof of citizenship before someone could purchase insurance through the exchange, MSNBC reported.

According to MSNBC, the White House issued the following "bullet points" outlining its position on the matter:

  • Undocumented immigrants would not be able to buy private insurance on the exchange. Those who are lawfully present in this country would be able to participate.


  • Undocumented immigrants would be able to buy insurance in the non-exchange private market, just as they do today. That market will shrink as the exchange takes hold, but it will still exist and will be subject to reforms such as the bans on pre-existing conditions and caps.


  • Verification will be required when purchasing health insurance on the exchange. One option is the SAVE program (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) which states currently use to make sure that undocumented immigrants don’t participate in safety-net programs for which they are ineligible.

The White House also stated that there would be no change in the present law which compensates hospitals for treating illegal immigrants in emergency rooms. http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/immigrants-and-insurance/

The present law spoken of in the last line was created during Reagan's administration.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1782
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 02:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
well if i go to canada, england, or any of a number of other countries, and fall desperately sick or get in an accident, they will take care of me. they will give me a bill but if i can't pay...whose hard luck is that. yet when visiting my mom from england with great travel insurance, i had to wait yonks and give her address as my own before they would admit me...in 1984.

so they did take care of me...i was born in that frigging hospital and knew half the doctors there! ... but they sure made a fuss about it. and ran a bunch of completely unnecessary expensive tests on me while i was hanging on death's door. sometimes i think it would be better if we had NO healthcare!

as to the racism, i think it is a small minority, definitely there but not the main element of the problem. there are also a lot of people who don't consider themselves racist who by virtue of never having thought about what it's like to be on the wrong side of the divide are what my grandson's dad calls "unconscious" racists. preferable to the conscious and willingly so, but still ...

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 03:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
****Other presidents weren't disrespected like that in the past.*****

begging your pardon dear glacous, but they threw shoes at mr bush's head. i would sa ythat is pretty disrespectful.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1412
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 03:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
No one in Congress threw a shoe at Bush. That happened in Iraq.

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 04:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
yes, but he said no president was disrespected like that, he didn't say by whom.

or under what conditions.

the conditions were similar. it was both during a speech.

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 04:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
well hot dam, they addressed it sept 12th. which was after the incident by the way.

as long as it was addressed. up until it was addressed, it was a non-truth, or non enforced rule. which is basically non existant. i am glad they addressed it. many tax payers like me just want things to be clear, thats all.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1412
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 07:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
The administration clarified their position after the speech, but even if they hadn't Joe Wilson still would have been on the wrong side of the equation as there was no provision for illegals to have access.

The incidents of disrespect were quite different. Bush wasn't in Congress, and he wasn't giving a speech. He was doing a press conference. Also, it wasn't a citizen of his own country that threw the shoe.

I think Glaucus was speaking strictly about disrespect within the house of Congress, because that's the only place no President has been so disrespected with such a yell.

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 1404
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 07:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
i don't hate him for it. i'm not even mad at him for it. it was disrespectful to the american people when he bowed. in the scheme of things it really isn't that big of a deal.

i could really care less. certain things like acorn thugs in his pocket and other things make me think he is less honest than most. i got my good eye on him.

there have been far worse faux paux lately and bigger jerks than him.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 817
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 08:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Sad to watch someone, especially a former President, in the end stage of senility.

lalalinda

IP: Logged

NosiS
Moderator

Posts: 64
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 08:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NosiS     Edit/Delete Message
The Democrats can take their hypocrisy on decorum and eat it, as far as I'm concerned. Joe Wilson made a mistake out of passion, not racism. This [i.e. the health care bill] is an issue that is poignant for most Americans and if an outburst from a Senator is going to be addressed, then it should be fair. I had understood that a speech from a President in front of a joint session required complete silence. No applause, no cheering, AND CERTAINLY no booing or calling names.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBxmEGG71PM&feature=player_embedded

edited 09/17/2009 12:03 am

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1782
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 09:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
dear nosis, 1) he is a congressman 2) if he can't control his temper he has no business in the room.

who cares about joe wilson anyway?

IP: Logged

NosiS
Moderator

Posts: 64
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 09:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NosiS     Edit/Delete Message
Excuse my mistake.

A Congressman not a Senator.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 817
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 09:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Apparently you care about Joe Wilson katatonic.

You've been hyperventilating all over the threads about Joe Wilson's "YOU LIE" comment.

Besides, O'Bomber resorted to calling those who oppose O'BomberCare liars...and O'Bomber said it first. To say something is a lie requires there be a liar to say them. O'Bomber called Congressional Members liars in their own House.

Besides, it's O'Bomber who was on Lying Road and he got called out for it.

Shouldn't a President be in sufficient control of himself...and his tongue to maintain decorum in an important gathering...televised on broadcast television?

That's a double edged knife which cuts both directions katatonic.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 817
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 09:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
"Just 12% of voters nationwide believe most opponents of the President’s plan are racists. Republicans and unaffiliated voters overwhelmingly reject that notion but Democrats are more evenly divided. "
www.rasmussenreports.com

"One week after President Obama’s speech to Congress, opposition to his health care reform plan has reached a new high of 55%. The latest Rasmussen Reports daily tracking poll shows that just 42% now support the plan, matching the low first reached in August."
www.rasmussenreports.com

IP: Logged

Eleanore
Moderator

Posts: 46
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 16, 2009 10:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eleanore     Edit/Delete Message
Rude? Yes. Racist? No. Although I'd love to play that card myself. I'm a first generation American, "hispanic" female ... obviously if you disagree with me, EVER, then you're a racist, a xenophobe and a mysoginist. Yay, me!


However, I do think it only fair that if passionate dissent is to be disallowed during the President's speeches then so should passionate support. That is, everyone should have to sit quietly and not make any sort of an outburst, positive or negative. You certainly can't argue that cheering and clapping and hopping up and down with tears streaming down your face is respectful behavior. It's a speech, not a concert, after all. No cheering, no jeering ... and then no wasting time on such a stupid non-issue for anyone.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 1419
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 17, 2009 02:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message
"I think Glaucus was speaking strictly about disrespect within the house of Congress, because that's the only place no President has been so disrespected with such a yell."

Yes, AG

That's what I meant. I should have made that clear. Thanks for understanding and pointing that out.


also the man that threw shoes at Bush's head was an Iraqi citizen in Iraq.

That's a lot different from a congressman disrespecting the president during a speech.

it's comparing apples and oranges.

peace,

Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

- Eckhart Tolle

IP: Logged

Dee
Knowflake

Posts: 297
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 17, 2009 01:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dee     Edit/Delete Message
So i guess we Just let Obama do what he wants. to question anything would be racist

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1782
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 17, 2009 01:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
well obama has pretty much officially said he doesn't think the opposition is due to racism, so who cares what the talking heads say? people who just love attention can say anything.

IP: Logged

Dee
Knowflake

Posts: 297
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 17, 2009 01:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dee     Edit/Delete Message
people who's comments can be picked up by the media like Jimmy Carter should be careful of what they say, Unless of course they just enjoy stirring the pot.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 1419
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 17, 2009 02:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

shrugs

USA is an Eristic nation

enough said


Raymond

------------------
"Nothing matters absolutely;
the truth is it only matters relatively"

- Eckhart Tolle

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a