Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Report: Secret Service strained to protect Obama

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Report: Secret Service strained to protect Obama
Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 1814
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 22, 2009 03:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

An internal congressional report questioning the ability of the Secret Service to continue fulfilling its duties was leaked to the Boston Globe. The report says the Secret Service is strained by a drastic increase in threats to President Obama, coupled with deep budget cuts. Some are speculating that the agency may need to relinquish all or part of its roles in protecting the country's financial machinery in order to focus resources on the protection of the president and other high-profile leaders.

The report, issued in August by the Congressional Research Service, claimed that if "an evaluation of the service's two missions" were to be done at this time, there's a good possibility that "it might be determined that it is ineffective...to conduct its protection mission and investigate financial crimes." Additionally, an anonymously quoted government official said that many inside the halls of Congress and within the Secret Service itself are questioning whether or not the agency's effectiveness wouldn't be enhanced by transferring some of its responsibilities regarding the investigation of financial crimes over to the Treasury Department.

Talking Points Memo noted that Ronald Kessler, the author of a recently released book on the Secret Service's protection of U.S. presidents, recently said that threats against President Obama are up 400 percent from the number of threats levied against former President George W. Bush, while the size of the agency's staff has only increased by 5.3 percent.

The Southern Poverty Law Center says that the U.S. has seen a 35 percent rise in hate groups in recent years, and few doubt that the discontent stirred up over the election of an African-American president is fueling the rise in threats. But, could the influx of modern technology also be to blame?

As the cost of computer technology has fallen (and accessibility to high-speed Internet service has spread), more and more people are spending more and more time online. Accordingly, these people are doing what people often do on the Internet: sending emails, communicating in chat rooms and on social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace, watching YouTube videos, etc. According to results of a recent study by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, these activities seem to be enhancing the scope of extremist groups' reach:

With over 200 million users, online bigots have to date outpaced efforts to remove them. Some sites have thousands of friends, thus enabling the message of hate to spread virally...This user-generated material increases the viral spread of extremism online and aids in increasing the social acceptability of hate in mainstream discourse. By creating an environment where users are equal participants in the Web, all editorial functions are removed and expressions of hate can easily flow unchallenged.

In other words, extremists once confined to small sects can now congregate on the Internet anonymously and distribute propaganda to millions of people in mere seconds. People with extreme views can also now communicate direct threats to individuals quicker and more easily than they have previously, thanks to the immediacy of email and chat rooms.

The Secret Service, presently housed under the bureaucratic umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, was initially established in 1865 to help combat the rise in counterfeiting that took place in that era. The protection of national leaders didn't become a full-time responsibility until William McKinley was assassinated in 1901. Congress passed a law in 1917 making any threat against the president a federal crime, and the responsibility of investigating such threats often falls upon the Secret Service. Along with protecting presidents, the agency's role in policing financial shenanigans was expanded when the 20th century's technological revolution led to a rise in electronic financial transactions.

It should be noted in all of this, however, that the Secret Service has issued a response in which the agency denied any decreased capacity to carry out its missions, saying that the Boston Globe's report was "not accurate and lacks a good deal of information."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20091021/ts_ynews/ynews_ts950

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 343
From: Nov. 11 2005
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 22, 2009 09:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message
If W. and his VP did one thing well it was put a face and a profile on hate. Extremists had a direction for their fears. No, not all extremist's are WASP's or what I like to call WASC [c for Christians] but they are certainly one of the most vocal...and since the media is 'managed' by those who share similar values this group is the one that gets the most face time.

At present we have an environment that resembles a societal petri dish for those that eat hate and fear for breakfast. President Obama might have become the 'face' for these types. I am grossly oversimplifying; know it...
When I ask people 'how safe' do you think Obama is? they usually touch on our bloody history. One guy reminded me that George Wallace was shot too.

Think about it for a minute. How many have been shot, or shot at and killed? [leaders or gov]
And one stands out, at least for me...Sirhan Bishara Sirhan. Robert Kennedy's killer. Why? because the shooters have been WASC types.
I am very concerned about the President's safety. If the S.S. and others manage to keep him [Obama] safe for 3 more years it will be luck perhaps more than skill responsible.

Another thing I would like to touch on [yahoo as the source] ever wondered about the headlines your isp spoon-feeds daily? They all promote the same things, because they 'sell' ... people click on them. Two major themes no matter which isp...aol, earthlink..the lot- fear is number one, acquisition a close second. I used to smirk at the 'top searched' list. Now it makes me queasy.

Obama has been highly visible, and his stamina is pretty incredible. I think his most vulnerable time might have been the campaign, but then many theorists say that shooters themselves were pawns. The guy who reminded me about Gov Wallace also reminded me that the hate mongers have not organized fully...a depressing thought, as I see allot of organizing now. All under the guise of freedom.

IP: Logged

shura
Knowflake

Posts: 50
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted October 22, 2009 11:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for shura     Edit/Delete Message
hmmmmm

that's a very interesting story.

wonder why they did that

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a