Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Grope Central, At An Airport Near You

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Grope Central, At An Airport Near You
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 17, 2010 11:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Senators and TSA Defend "Love Pats" at Airports
TSA Chief Admits Screenings are "Invasive" But Says They're Necessary to Stay Ahead of Terrorists' New, Non-Metallic Weapons

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/17/national/main7063414.shtml

Get your hands off me, TSA!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/17/tsa-patdowns-scanner

EDITORIAL: Big Sister's police state
TSA's tyrannical tactics threaten American freedoms

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/16/big-sisters-police-state/

Feds holding firm on intrusive airport security
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20101117/D9JI6A0G0.html

DA promises to prosecute overly touchy pat downs

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/peninsula&id=7793386

What Happens if You Decline a Full Body Scan?
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/11/15/what-happens-if-you-decline-a-full-body-scan/

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 18, 2010 12:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
NAPOLITANO: THE BALL’S IN MY COURT NOW
November 17, 2010


Ann Coulter

After the 9/11 attacks, when 19 Muslim terrorists -- 15 from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates and one each from Egypt and Lebanon, 14 with "al" in their names -- took over commercial aircraft with box-cutters, the government banned sharp objects from planes.

Airport security began confiscating little old ladies' knitting needles and breaking the mouse-sized nail files off of passengers' nail clippers. Surprisingly, no decrease in the number of hijacking attempts by little old ladies and manicurists was noted.

After another Muslim terrorist, Richard Reid, AKA Tariq Raja, AKA Abdel Rahim, AKA Abdul Raheem, AKA Abu Ibrahim, AKA Sammy Cohen (which was only his eHarmony alias), tried to blow up a commercial aircraft with explosive-laden sneakers, the government prohibited more than 3 ounces of liquid from being carried on airplanes.

All passengers were required to take off their shoes for special security screening, which did not thwart a single terrorist attack, but made airport security checkpoints a lot smellier.

After Muslim terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab of Nigeria tried to detonate explosive material in his underwear over Detroit last Christmas, the government began requiring nude body scans at airports.

The machines, which cannot detect chemicals or plastic, would not have caught the diaper bomber. So, again, no hijackers were stopped, but being able to see passengers in the nude boosted the morale of airport security personnel by 22 percent.

After explosives were inserted in two ink cartridges and placed on a plane headed to the United States from the Muslim nation of Yemen, the government banned printer cartridges from all domestic flights, resulting in no improvement in airport security, while requiring ink cartridges who traveled to take Amtrak.

So when the next Muslim terrorist, probably named Abdul Ahmed al Shehri, places explosives in his anal cavity, what is the government going to require then? (If you're looking for a good investment opportunity, might I suggest rubber gloves?)

Last year, a Muslim attempting to murder Prince Mohammed bin Nayef of Saudi Arabia blew himself up with a bomb stuck up his anus. Fortunately, this didn't happen near an airport, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would now be requiring full body cavity searches to fly.

You can't stop a terrorist attack by searching for the explosives any more than you can stop crime by taking away everyone's guns.

In the 1970s, liberal ideas on crime swept the country. Gun owners were treated like criminals while actual criminals were coddled and released. If only we treated criminals with dignity and respect and showed them the system was fair, liberals told us, criminals would reward us with good behavior.

As is now well known, crime exploded in the '70s. It took decades of conservative law-and-order policies to get crime back to near-1950s levels.

It's similarly pointless to treat all Americans as if they're potential terrorists while trying to find and confiscate anything that could be used as a weapon. We can't search all passengers for explosives because Muslims stick explosives up their anuses. (Talk about jobs Americans just won't do.)

You have to search for the terrorists.

Fortunately, that's the one advantage we have in this war. In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born, Muslim males. (Think: "Guys Madonna would date.")

This would give us a major leg up -- if only the country weren't insane.

Is there any question that we'd be looking for Swedes if the 9/11 terrorists, the shoe bomber, the diaper bomber and the printer cartridge bomber had all been Swedish? If the Irish Republican Army were bombing our planes, wouldn't we be looking for people with Irish surnames and an Irish appearance?

Only because the terrorists are Muslims do we pretend not to notice who keeps trying to blow up our planes.

It would be harder to find Swedes or Irish boarding commercial airliners in the U.S. than Muslims. Swarthy foreigners stand out like a sore thumb in an airport. The American domestic flying population is remarkably homogenous. An airport is not a Sears department store.

Only about a third of all Americans flew even once in the last year, and only 7 percent took more than four round trips. The majority of airline passengers are middle-aged, middle-class, white businessmen with about a million frequent flier miles. I'd wager that more than 90 percent of domestic air travelers were born in the U.S.

If the government did nothing more than have a five-minute conversation with the one passenger per flight born outside the U.S., you'd need 90 percent fewer Transportation Security Administration agents and airlines would be far safer than they are now.

Instead, Napolitano just keeps ordering more invasive searches of all passengers, without exception -- except members of Congress and government officials, who get VIP treatment, so they never know what she's doing to the rest of us.

Two weeks ago, Napolitano ordered TSA agents to start groping women's breasts and all passengers' genitalia -- children, nuns and rape victims, everyone except government officials and members of Congress. (Which is weird because Dennis Kucinich would like it.)

"Please have your genitalia out and ready to be fondled when you approach the security checkpoint."

This is the punishment for refusing the nude body scan for passengers who don't want to appear nude on live video or are worried about the skin cancer risk of the machines --risks acknowledged by the very Johns Hopkins study touted by the government.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that we need to keep the government as far away from airport security as possible, and not only because Janet Napolitano did her graduate work in North Korea.
http://www.anncoulter.com/

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 18, 2010 10:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
so all muslims are "swarthy" now? do me a favour...

but i have to agree the security fiasco is PATHETIC. they will first of all NEVER be able to cover every base. and if they can't figure out how to do their job without violating everyone's personal space, humiliating the general passengers with pat downs, strip searches, etc - or xraying us all into the cancer ward - maybe they should just put an undercover agent on every flight? surely they could more easily train a flight steward to respond to emergencies and suspicious behaviours less expensively than all this machinery?

but i hear the maker of the scanners, which to my mind are even more offensive than pat-downs, not because of modesty but HEALTH threats, was a client of the man who insists we have these machines for general airport security? not making a statement, but i did hear this.

i don't think racial profiling is any better answer. it just doesn't compute, and would make it oh so simple to avoid scrutiny, just hire a blond if you can't find one to volunteer! dumkofs!

a dog or three in the area can also find most anything without invading everyone's space. why do we need to line the pockets of politicians buds and treat everyone as a criminal? answer..we don't.

IP: Logged

BearsArcher
Knowflake

Posts: 153
From: Arizona with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2010

posted November 18, 2010 03:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BearsArcher     Edit/Delete Message
It is simply disgusting how our rights are being stripped from us (literally) by the government and defended by the idiot in charge, Janet- Skunk- Napalitaino.


Kat- Swarthy is just a term that refers to those of a dark cast, complexion or eyes. It is not a derogatory term nor racist, however I am sure that there are going to be a fair number of people that will make it out that way.

IP: Logged

PlutoSquared
Moderator

Posts: 1417
From: Mars
Registered: Aug 2010

posted November 18, 2010 04:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PlutoSquared     Edit/Delete Message
I'm not happy about this topic. My only response to it, is that... I'll drive. Screw flying, anymore.

IP: Logged

AbsintheDragonfly
Knowflake

Posts: 1637
From: Gaia
Registered: Apr 2010

posted November 18, 2010 05:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AbsintheDragonfly     Edit/Delete Message
This isn't a new thing. This has been happening for what, about 10 years? The strip search is new though.

Yeah I'm driving or else taking Amtrak. Farq the plane.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 18, 2010 05:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Here's the "rule maker".

Doesn't everyone feel safer with Big Sis Janet in charge of Homeland Insecurity?

IP: Logged

PlutoSquared
Moderator

Posts: 1417
From: Mars
Registered: Aug 2010

posted November 18, 2010 06:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PlutoSquared     Edit/Delete Message
Yep. That red clown nose makes me feel very secure.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 18, 2010 10:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Big Sis Janet should make you feel more secure.

This is the O'Bomber administration member who designated returning US military service personnel as possible terrorist suspects...along with those who adhere to their 2nd Amendment rights...and those who actually believe in the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution....AND...put forth a report to law enforcement nationwide saying so.

It's hard to imagine a worst twit in charge of Homeland Insecurity than Janet Napolitano.

Gee, I wonder if members of Congress go through the very same Homeland Insecurity screening process as...the "the great unwashed" from "fly over country"?


Come fly with me.....

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 22, 2010 11:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
This invasion of personal privacy will cease when the United States gets rid of their government fleet of jets and Senators, House members, administration officials and government bureaucrats start flying commercial like everyone else and submit themselves to the very rules they demand of everyone else. It would also save millions and possibly billions in costs to taxpayers.

Even Hillary would avoid being patted down in airports if she could. So far...since she doesn't fly commercial and isn't subject the rules governing everyone else...she hasn't been patted down and groped like the rest of America.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7076427n&tag=related;photovideo

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 22, 2010 11:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
i didn't mention race. it was coulter i believe who mentioned redheads and blondes should be ruled out automatically, are there no blond muslims now? i'd lay odds the next perp would be swedish...maybe irish? there's no way you can spot a muslim,

but if i have to get nuked it will be in a doctor's or dentist's care. who cares if an xray of an unidentifiable person gets seen? our health is at risk.

of course not flying is an option. now on top of driving, which you can choose NOT to do rather than buy insurance, flying is a CHOICE, right? so one by one by CHOICE we are GIVING up our freedoms. there are a LOT of things we can CHOOSE NOT TO DO. like go to the movies, eat out, talk in the street, any other choices you want to opt out of? how about buying the food of your CHOICE?

now if EVERYONE refused to fly for thanksgiving, that might get the wind up.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 23, 2010 07:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, we can fore-go intrusive body searches by driving to Europe instead of flying.

Yes, we can opt out of O'BomberCare by giving up breathing.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 23, 2010 10:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
opting out was a choice written into the healthcare bill, madeira. in several different ways. keep your current insurance, no 1. pay 50 bucks a month if you earn enough. the gov to pay it if you are broke. not quite the same as being exposed to xrays or the possibly rough hands of an overworked agent as preparation to thanksgiving or christmas...

IP: Logged

AbsintheDragonfly
Knowflake

Posts: 1637
From: Gaia
Registered: Apr 2010

posted November 23, 2010 02:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AbsintheDragonfly     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Yes, we can fore-go intrusive body searches by driving to Europe instead of flying.

Don't you have one of those aqua cars? I totally do!

We could drive to Mexico or Canada, and then head to Europe though couldn't we

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 23, 2010 06:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
i prefer an invisible cloak and i will fly where i like. on my magic carpet if necessary!

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 23, 2010 06:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
funny i heard today that LAST YEAR the HOUSE passed legislation to BAN THESE machines. i guess that got stonewalled in the senate too. gotta love those power-politicians who don't let the dems get away with ANYthing even if it is GOOD something.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 23, 2010 10:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
"Don't you have one of those aqua cars? I totally do!

We could drive to Mexico or Canada, and then head to Europe though couldn't we"...AD

Hey, doesn't everyone have one of these?

Forget American Airlines. Forget Delta. Forget all the rest.

When you need a fast trip to Europe there's no need to stand in line to get groped by government geeks.

Just take extra gasoline. It's a hell of a long way to the next gas station. But, on the bright side, you won't need to rent a a puddle jumper car in Europe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aUm33i7n1U

IP: Logged

AbsintheDragonfly
Knowflake

Posts: 1637
From: Gaia
Registered: Apr 2010

posted November 24, 2010 12:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AbsintheDragonfly     Edit/Delete Message
WANT!!!

quote:
take extra gasoline

Whatchu thinks in the trunk?

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 5748
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 24, 2010 02:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
well i'll just get out my mer-kaba thanks. see you there.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2564
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 24, 2010 04:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
"Whatchu thinks in the trunk?"

An auxiliary power plant consisting of a team of 4 Hamsters and a Hamster Wheel geared to a 4 inch prop.

It gets 10 Hamster pellets to the mile.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2010

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a