Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Another Leftist Idiot Outs Himself

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Another Leftist Idiot Outs Himself
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 3710
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 21, 2011 12:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The day is fast approaching when all the leftist icons will have exposed themselves as the idiots they really are.

The list is far too long to reproduce here but Deepak Chopra has just added himself.

By now, one would think the leftist choir would be telling their icons to keep their mouths firmly shut; that they are doing real damage to the leftist cause. But then, if these idiots had a lick of sense, they wouldn't be leftists in the first place.

The Chopra Humiliation
Are you tired of being insulted by your self-appointed "elite" yet?
by John Hayward
06/20/2011

Look out, America! You stand on the brink of a “national cleansing” that could become as violent as Mao’s Cultural Revolution, and only Deepak Chopra can save you.

When you’re the Huffington Post, it’s hard to “sink to a new low,” but they managed it last week by publishing a fevered screed from Deepak Chopra, an absurd figure who keeps turning up as a serious analyst in the mainstream press. These days, his Really Deep Thoughts are concerned with the looming menace of Sarah Palin. According to Chopra, if she decides to run for President, her election would plunge America into a Ragnarok of fire and blood.

Chopra wastes no time establishing his idiocy, making what he probably thinks is a funny Paul Revere slam in his first paragraph:

"It will be a devastating loss if Sarah Palin peddles enough books and visits enough gun shows that she has no incentive to run for president. There would be many chances for unique moments in the White House if she won. How about Sarah on horseback, riding through the Potomac basin like Paul Revere, ringing bells like he did and shouting, "The Democrats are coming!" That would give folks ample warning to quickly cling to their guns and religion before the left wing snatches them away.

"I know that she suffered ridicule for her version of Paul Revere's ride, but from a Hollywood standpoint, she actually improved the story. Movies have soundtracks, in case anyone didn't notice, and bells are a lot more cinematic than one lantern hanging in a church steeple. Or even two. (You can hear her defense of her version on Fox News, or as my friends call it, the F Channel.)"

Hey, Deepak? Buddy? Lean close so I can make this very clear to you. She was right about Paul Revere. You and your ignorant friends are wrong. That’s what you get from learning history from Hollywood. Thus does the “reality-based community” cling to its illusions, weeks after a group of Boston historians tried to save them from embarrassment.

Also, that crack about “clinging to guns and religion?” That was said by your boy Obama, Deepak, not Sarah Palin. I guess recent history is as mysterious to you as American history.

Chopra’s article is a fascinating tour through an utterly clueless mind. He thinks “Wall Street recklessness” was the sole cause of the financial meltdown. He thinks Palin is “amazingly cheerful about the recession,” which suggests he has never listened to a single word she has said or written. Nobody is cheerful about the Obama recession, Deepak, least of all the people who have ideas for repairing the damage after he’s gone. Don’t mistake faith in the American spirit for nonchalance about its incompetent government.

He wants to “atone” for his earlier assessment of Palin as “our collective shadow” of “pent-up bigotry, hatred and anger,” which made her “Joe the Plumber’s calendar girl.” He also manages to work Alcoholics Anonymous into a tortured metaphor about President Palin helping us hit rock bottom, adding insensitivity to sexism.

By contrast, Chopra now fears that “Sarah would smile her way into the presidency” and… well, it’s not exactly clear what he thinks her agenda would be. He just throws around sneering insults about her preference for crayon scribbling to Picasso, without ever making anything approaching a coherent point. Since the tone of the piece is a mocking plea for happy Sarah to lead a nation of mindless rubes to glory, the piece feels less like an attack on Palin than a broad insult directed at America itself, which bumbles around in the playground of its happy fantasies while Dr. Chopra sadly shakes his head and wishes it could ascend to his level.

The upshot of the Palin Presidency, according to Chopra, would be “a national cleansing, like Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Nothing as violent, however, not at first.” Hey, remember when airheads like Chopra and his friends were accusing Sarah Palin of being an accessory to murder because she used bulls-eye symbols on political maps, which the Tucson Shooter never actually saw? Now Chopra thinks nothing of comparing her to a savage Communist dictator who killed millions of people. Has “No Labels” seen this essay yet?

Chopra’s repeated slams of Palin, and America, for unreasonable cheerfulness are confusing. Isn’t this guy a New Age guru who made his bones by selling Oprah’s America feel-good books about inner peace and enlightenment? And now he’s mad at us for being too happy? He’s not taking the end of Oprah’s show very well, is he?

This remarkable bit of intellectual flatulence is really directed more at the American public than Sarah Palin. Every paragraph drips with contempt for the people he thinks will lurch toward Washington like a zombie horde, if the Maid of Wasilla gets into the White House and summons them with her beer bong.

What else can a self-appointed elitist like Deepak Chopra do? He knows even less about economics than he does about history, so it’s not as if he can write a persuasive article about the wondrous achievements of Obamanomics. That’s why he took the time to vent his spleen on flyover-country America, and express his dripping contempt for their possible willingness to consider voting for someone who isn’t even running yet.

He and his ilk are faced with the absolute, complete, and comprehensive failure of everything they believe in. Its ruin is clearly visible all around us. You’ll see more of this cornered-rat behavior from them, as they are left with no recourse but to hiss their hate and fury at the American people who are preparing to pass judgment on them in 2012, and hope for rescue from the dwindling core of supporters who share their hatreds enough to be blinded by them.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44319&s=rcmp

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6568
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 21, 2011 04:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
oh dear, here we go again.

"obama's recession"...the one that started a year before his nomination, wow, how did he do that?

and apparently palin is a NO FLY ZONE all her own when it comes to people describing her negatively. OF COURSE IT IS OKAY TO COMPARE OBAMA TO MAO "a savage chinese dictator" but to suggest sarah might wear a similar coat is SACRILEGE!!!

of COURSE mao MUST have been a savage, he was chinese, wasn't he? his culture only predates the euro-american civilization by a few thousand years. how could they be anything but savage?

i'm disappointed in chopra too. i thought he had a better grasp on how (NOT)relevant the lady from alaska, er, arizona is.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 3710
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 22, 2011 10:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm always amazed when those who claim to be Americans...and middle of the road Americans at that...think it's OK to lie about and it's OK for others to lie about people they don't like.

Put a cork in your nonsense katatonic.

The Socialist Mao killed about 100,000,000 of his own citizens...deliberately and intentionally.

O'Bomber is an ideological Socialist of the Marxist set, so comparisons to Mao...another Socialist are not in any way...unfounded. They share the very same political ideology...not the very same actions.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6568
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 22, 2011 11:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
the difference, watson, is in character. palin admits NO mistakes, accepts NO criticism, indeed acts like a law unto herself...ie dictatorial.

obama, on the other hand, takes the opposition into account and does his best to recognize and compromise with their position..ie democratic.

in fact it may be his downfall that he is TOO democratic in his approach. the fact that he is not as polished in front of a tv camera (not having been employed in front of one like ms palin) is in his favour in my eyes. ums and ahs just signify taking a moment to collect a thought, something palin doesn't do...she just rolls out whatever is on her tongue and then redacts later to cover her lapses.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 3710
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 23, 2011 11:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think you must have gone totally around the bend.

Sarah Palin has absorbed more lying allegations and phony stories about her and her family than any politician in the 20th or 21st Century.

Frankly, I'm happy to see Palin rubbing leftist noses in their own bullshiiit.

Deepak Chopra is just the latest brain dead leftist to out himself as a total idiot.

Debbie Schultz said demoscats own the economy NOW. The fact O'Bomber has fumbled the ball and shown himself and the Socialist idiots he's surrounded himself with to be economic bunglers and dunces isn't mitigated by when the recession started. There have been many recessions in the US economy over the years.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5423
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 23, 2011 07:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Jwhop, you can't preach about lying, and in the same post turn around and lie. It just makes you look insane.

quote:
O'Bomber is an ideological Socialist of the Marxist set, so comparisons to Mao...another Socialist are not in any way...unfounded.

This is a COMPLETELY unfounded statement. Not even remotely plausible. I don't see Obama swimming in polluted rivers in an effort to show the citizenry that the rivers are completely safe. No. Nor do I see him killing his citizens deliberately nor intentionally. You're off your rocker.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 3710
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 24, 2011 10:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Don't be your usual dopey self acoustic.

I said O'Bomber is an ideological Socialist of the Marxist set...like Mao. They share the same political ideology..."not the very same actions".

However, there is this.

"We Kinda Agree With Mao That Political Power Comes Largely From The Barrel Of A Gun"
Ron Bloom is O'Bomber's Manufacturing Czar...oh, and do take note of the "WE".

Not in America acoustic. In America, political power comes from the "consent of the governed", not from the barrel of a gun.

Which brings me to another of your Loony-Tunes positions.

Members of Congress were not sent to Washington "To Rule"...as you said but rather to "Govern"...with the consent of the governed.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6568
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 24, 2011 11:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
unless of course the barrel of the gun is in the hand of dissenting proud american citizens? how many times have y ou threatened the hypothetical govt with an armed citizenry should they push too far?

weapons are not the sole province of maoists and marxists so...throwing that comment out with the bathwater!

and that is without even reading your link(not that you actually linked to your quote!), just out of principle pointing out the hypocrisy of your objections. it seems arms are only permissible when the people YOU agree with want to defend themselves, and not anyone else.

being armed is either acceptable or NOT. for everyone or NOone. which will it be?

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5423
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 24, 2011 01:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting Jwhop. You do realize that you JUST DID what you accused me of doing in the other thread, right? You took someone else's argument off of a politically biased site, and paraphrased it right here for us.

Anyway, let's deal with your equivocating again.

quote:
I said O'Bomber is an ideological Socialist of the Marxist set...like Mao. They share the same political ideology..."not the very same actions".

quote:
The Socialist Mao killed about 100,000,000 of his own citizens...deliberately and intentionally.

O'Bomber is an ideological Socialist of the Marxist set, so comparisons to Mao...another Socialist are not in any way...unfounded.


Did you or did you not include Mao's actions in your original statement claiming that comparisons to Mao are not "in any way" unfounded? You did. So let's not try to get out of the implication you set up, ok?

quote:
weapons are not the sole province of maoists and marxists so...throwing that comment out with the bathwater!

Good point, Kat. After all, we just learned from Palin that Revere rode out to warn the British they couldn't take our guns.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 9513
From: The Goober Galaxy
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 27, 2011 06:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wow, I like his books.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 3710
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 28, 2011 08:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
God, it's too bad that brains..like scrambled eggs cannot be un-scrambled.

The second amendment was instituted precisely because there are people like Ron Bloom who believe in the Marxist/Socialist/Progressive/Maoist principle of using deadly force against citizens to acquire and hold political power.

The second amendment is..and was intended to be the last line of defense against tyranny.

Perhaps one day mental science will progress to the point those with scrambled brains can be cured...but I doubt it.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a