|
Author
|
Topic: A Short Constitutional Quiz
|
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2011 11:45 AM
  
http://www.restorerespectnow.com/?utm_source=FirstPrinciples&utm_medium=cpc&utm_content=AD7&utm_campaign=FirstPrinciples IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 04, 2011 08:59 AM
So, I presume leftists here took the Constitutional Quiz...and dead bang flunked!  IP: Logged |
juniperb
Moderator Posts: 2661
From: Blue Star Kachina
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 04, 2011 10:01 AM
Well now  I took the test, got the 2/3 majority one wrong. But I didn`t finish the paperwork to join up so I didn`t get the "end result" to post. Couldn`t even go back to note the entire question to see how it was worded. ------------------
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it. ~Rumi~ IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 04, 2011 02:57 PM
of course you do jwhop, in the absence of any evidence, just pick the conclusion that suits your divisive mindset!lol, "presume" is the PERFECT choice of word! i didn't know the quiz was required - my bad - when i have time i will look at it!! have you looked at gary allen's book yet? shall i "presume" you are scared to see what's in it?  IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 09:06 AM
Question katatonic.Did you pass the Constitutional Quiz...or did you FLUNK? Yeah Juni, I missed the same question believing the President must sign off on Constitutional Amendments. Wrong! IP: Logged |
emitres
Moderator Posts: 367
From:
Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted October 06, 2011 11:47 AM
question:what if a non US person got all the questions right? ------------------
" Some define good as that which preserves, and evil as that which destroys; but destruction can be cleansing and purifying, for there is such a thing in both men and races as spiritual constipation, which comes from too much preservation of the status quo." ( Dion Fortune ) IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 12:17 PM
answer jwhop: i have not looked at it yet. as i already said above!but you haven't answered my question yet, have you looked at the book? IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 12:37 PM
"what if a non US person got all the questions right?"...emitresThen emitres, I would ask if that non US person got...ALL THE ANSWERS RIGHT? katatonic, what book do you propose I "look at"? IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 12:55 PM
well well jwhop, proof that you do not bother to pay attention... the book i linked here a short while ago and have mentioned several times since. the book i linked to about a year ago as well!now tell me why i should take your quiz when you don't even read my posts? and how you have ANY idea what i am talking about? as to your test, i got them all right EXCEPT the one which is open to debate, ie the constitutionality of the mandate due to interstate commerce, which answer would depend COMPLETELY on which side you view it from. and the fact that it is open to debate is demonstrated by the number of DIFFERING opinions given by the courts in which this law has been "tried". lol at your answer to emitres, can't you ever admit that someone who disagrees with you might just know what they are talking about? IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 01:21 PM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2297676/conspiracy-Gary-Allen-None-Dare-Call-it-Conspiracy-english-rarereactor in case it makes it easier for you to open, the author was a conservative. it was written in 1972, is quite short and easy to read, though this copy has a few overprinted phrases. IP: Logged |
juniperb
Moderator Posts: 2661
From: Blue Star Kachina
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 06, 2011 04:08 PM
quote:
Yeah Juni, I missed the same question believing the President must sign off on Constitutional Amendments. Wrong!
Yep, I sure thought they had too as well but... I`ll take my 4 out of 5 and call it good ------------------
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it. ~Rumi~ IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 07, 2011 09:15 AM
"lol at your answer to emitres, can't you ever admit that someone who disagrees with you might just know what they are talking about?"...katatonicNow why would you suggest I was giving emitres a hard time katatonic? I like emitres. In fact, if emitres had confirmed a non US citizen got all...THE ANSWERS RIGHT, I was going to suggest a trade; the non US citizen who got all...THE ANSWERS RIGHT for a citizen who doesn't get the QUESTIONS OR THE ANSWERS RIGHT!  Yep juni, 4 out of 5 ain't bad!  IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 07, 2011 12:57 PM
just joshing you jwhop, but do you know an american citizen such as you describe?and thanks for approving my "grade" too (and proving the point of my josh..) are you looking for an excuse to move to canada?  IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 08, 2011 12:26 PM
read the book yet, or even part of it?IP: Logged |
emitres
Moderator Posts: 367
From:
Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted October 09, 2011 11:04 PM
of course you were giving me a hard time jwhop... i would have been completely surprised had you not jumped at the chance too ( no no, not 'to', i really mean too ) but you're right, i should have been more grammatically correct - note to self for next time ------------------
" Some define good as that which preserves, and evil as that which destroys; but destruction can be cleansing and purifying, for there is such a thing in both men and races as spiritual constipation, which comes from too much preservation of the status quo." ( Dion Fortune ) IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 12185
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 11, 2011 05:53 PM
Weeeeee!  I got them all correct! Do I get a prize? Of course, it wasn't entirely fair, since I am taking a constitutional law class this semester, but I think I knew all of those answers already.
------------------
"Fall down 100 times, get up 101...this is success." --MEIP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 11, 2011 06:02 PM
hint: the mandate question is not yet decidedIP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 12185
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 11, 2011 06:40 PM
It's quite clearly unconstitutional, and I'm certain the Supreme Court will rule accordingly. But regardless, I'm not going to accept it; it violates my religious principles of being able to freely make my own personal health choices.IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 4291
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 12, 2011 04:49 PM
"of course you were giving me a hard time jwhop"...emitresI categorically deny I was giving you a hard time emitres!  Can't do any better than 5 out of 5 Randall.
IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 13, 2011 07:17 PM
well it is quite clearly unconstitutional to make that decision for yourself when the judicial system is still debating it...there are arguments on both sides and pretty equally too.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 12185
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 13, 2011 07:20 PM
No, wrong again, Kat. It is clearly constitutional for me to make that decision based on my being religiously opposed to Obamacare. ------------------
"Fall down 100 times, get up 101...this is success." --ME IP: Logged |
katatonic
Knowflake Posts: 7116
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 14, 2011 05:25 PM
i wasn't talking about your decision to claim religious grounds, but about the mandate being constitutional or not. as you see, there is always a get-out clause, so the mandate is hardly a major problem, is it??plus, if you opt to pay the $50/month "fine" you will have guilt-free coverage under the REAGAN MANDATE that insists doctors either work for nothing when asked(hardly a "capitalist" proposition is it?), or raise everyone ELSE's prices as they have done the last 25 years... IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 12185
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 14, 2011 06:56 PM
I'm not paying a fine on a law I know is unconstitutional.------------------
"Nurture great thoughts, for you will never go higher than you think."--DISRAELI IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
