Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Guess what?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Guess what?
Node
Knowflake

Posts: 1594
From: 1,981 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 04, 2011 09:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Clarance Thomas may be subject to retroactive recusal.

If so, his vote for the citizen united case will be voided.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 4235
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 05, 2011 10:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Such idiocy was seldom seen outside mental institutions; though it's becoming prevalent among the Loony-Tunes leftist set of which Slaughter is a charter member.

Get this. Slaughter wants to institute retroactive law to punish a black Supreme Court Justice with whom she...and other Loony-Tunes leftists disagree.

The active racism which runs riot through leftist circles is only one element of what's wrong in Loony-Tunes leftist circles and in Slaughter's thinking.

Clarence Thomas is a Black Associate Justice of the Supreme Court who didn't use the demoscat leftists "system" to arrive at one of the highest positions in the United States.

Thomas "Earned" his position the old fashioned way..through ability, diligence to legal and Constitutional principles and hard work.

To say that frosts Loony-Tunes leftists is an understatement. Leftists can't bear the thought of a minority making their way in life without benefit of leftist structure, guidance and assistance...like Affirmative Action for instance.

So, we have the member of the US House, Slaughter wanting a retroactive law to set aside the Supreme Court votes of Justice Thomas.

Note, Slaughter is a member of Congress who took an oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Within that Constitution Slaughter is supposed to be "upholding" is the prohibition against passing Ex post facto laws.

So, Slaughter is not only a Loony-Tunes leftist but also a grossly ignorant member of Congress who, if she had an ounce of character or integrity.....she would resign her House seat with immediate effect and crawl back into the woodwork from whence she came.

Ex post facto:

Literally...."after the fact".


IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 7042
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 05, 2011 12:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
with all due respect, jwhop, YOU are the one calling him black. perhaps he DID do it the old fashioned way without affirmative action, but perhaps he also did it the oldfashioned way with some dubious practices included?

if retroactive recusal is unconstitutional then it probably will not wash, will it?

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a