posted January 18, 2012 03:17 PM            

Let's see!

Newt says it would be good for minority teens to have part time jobs at schools...so they can develop a work ethic, are more likely to stay in school...and have money in their pockets...AND, that WORK/A JOB is a good thing!

Btw, do you know the unemployment rate among minority teens approaches 50%?

Newt went on to say...and I'm paraphrasing here...that he's going to continue teaching poor people how to get a job, how to then get a better job and how to someday OWN the jobs.

Sorry but I agree with Newt on this, right down the line!

Sorry too that I don't see that SC audience booing Juan Williams as breaking the "Golden Rule".

Williams got booed because he attempted to interject RACE into the debate. His bigger mistake was to direct his questions at Newt who ate him alive!

posted January 18, 2012 11:01 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
Juan Williams got booed by the audience for his line of questioning.

[b]Newt Gingrich gets STANDING OVATION at SC Debate - Juan Williams BOOED!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=negskRLCZfA [/B]

---

ha ha ha ha

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted January 18, 2012 11:16 PM            

Perhaps if the Taliban hadn't given a base of operations in Afghanistan to al-Qaeda from which to attack the United States THEN, those US bombs and missiles would have stayed in our munition depots.

posted January 21, 2012 10:22 AM            

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted January 21, 2012 05:41 PM            

I'm new here, I saw that booing of the Golden Rule. Been sad ever since.

Ron Paul fan here.

Expressing my Pisces moon desire for peace~
Faith

posted January 24, 2012 11:07 AM            

Have you ever heard of the Project for the New American Century?

This is the group of neoconservatives who designed our foreign policy, including various Bush administration officials like Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumseld.

They wanted to invade oil-rich countries prior to 9-11, and stated so publicly. Their stated ambition is to have an American Century dominated by our military.

The media is controlled by just a few CEOs, all of whom profit from war. Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex was not enough to protect us from them gaining the upper hand and taking over. It's only going to get worse here in America, as America has been declared a battlefield.

Beware of the media...they have made many peaceful people violent in their hearts.

Meant in kindness,
Faith

posted January 24, 2012 12:13 PM            

Yes I have.

This is the group of neoconservatives who designed our foreign policy, including various Bush administration officials like Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumseld.

Have you done your homework on the definition of Neo-Conservative"?

1: a former liberal espousing political conservatism

Wolfowitz is a former Liberal. Cheney is an old line Conservative and so is Rumsfeld.

They wanted to invade oil-rich countries prior to 9-11, and stated so publicly. Their stated ambition is to have an American Century dominated by our military.

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq. Hummm, my recollection is that Kommander Korruption was Prez in 1998.

If it's true neoconservatives wanted the US military to dominate the world, the US military already was dominant and still is. Further, Rumsfeld attempted to downsize the military which would be at odds with your statement.

The media is controlled by just a few CEOs, all of whom profit from war.

True statement needing only clarification as to who these people are and what kind of media they preside over. The news media, broadcast and print, are overwhelmingly far left of center and could not possibly be part of the neoconservative cabal you're talking about.

Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex was not enough to protect us from them gaining the upper hand and taking over.

They can no more "take over" than corporations can "take over". The citizens of America can vote any congressional member or all congressional members..and the President out of office. American citizens can bankrupt any corporations by the simple expedient of refusing to do business with them.

It's only going to get worse here in America, as America has been declared a battlefield.

Let me remind you that a far left of center President signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law and that half the demoscat members in the House voted FOR the National Defense Authorization Act. The US Senate is under the control of demoscats and they also voted FOR the National Defense Authorization Act. In fact, there was surprising opposition to this act by Conservatives in the US House.

Beware of the media...they have made many peaceful people violent in their hearts.

You're preaching to the choir here Faith. I don't believe 10% of what the print and broadcast media have to say.

posted January 24, 2012 01:45 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by iQ:
Looks like Newt's campaign suddenly got a fresh lease of life. It is a thumping win in SC. I must look at his chart, I was hoping Ron Paul would sneak through in SC by a wafer thin margin.

---

You and I both IQ... sad to say he won`t in FL either but bully for him trying to help America out by running.

jwhop, I know you didn`t wish him to run. I "assume" it`s because you knew he wouldn`t win and the votes would be a distraction/waste? Who do you think he will support, Romney?

Who we vote for , is who we deserve.
I will always believe that and hopefully folks will give it serious thought before they cast that vote. . .

posted January 24, 2012 10:42 PM            

I don't look at the world in left/right terms. As I see it, the media keeps that left/right paradigm alive, so when people say "left/right" a lot, I assume they are tuned into the mainstream media.

In reality, Congress now agrees on most issues. In reality, Congress is subservient to special interests. There is no left and right, just money and lobbyists.

You wrote: "True statement needing only clarification as to who these people are and what kind of media they preside over. The news media, broadcast and print, are overwhelmingly far left of center and could not possibly be part of the neoconservative cabal you're talking about."

Did you know that Rupert Murdoch is the one who started The Weekly Standard and put William Kristol in charge? Do you need any more evidence that Murdoch is in tight with the neocons and PNAC?

Another weird one is Sun Myung Moon of the Washington Times being tied in with the Council for National Policy, which promotes a pro-war agenda in evangelical circles.

Neocons are former liberals, yes. And they want to spend liberally. So it's amazing that they managed to convert real conservatives over to their war mindset, which you know wastes an unbelievable amount of money.

Remember what Zbigniew Brzezinksi told the Senate? "The war on terror is a mythical, historical narrative." HE knows that it's about oil, resources, and the Grand Chessboard...what I don't understand is, why doesn't everybody else know?

What do you say to Hillary Clinton's call for "The Pacific Century"? There aren't terrorists in China...are you okay with going to war for more obvious economical reasons?

The overstated terror threat is not worth the money, not worth turning into a police state about. We've just been lied to...and now, what America has wished upon others it is bringing upon itself. NDAA, TSA VIPR squads coming to highways, Enemy Expatriation Act, drones overhead, and so on.

That's the sad fact of the matter.

posted January 25, 2012 05:56 AM            

Romney's going to get his butt kicked because of his tax returns. Newt has paid over 30% but Romney has paid only 14% when combining 2010 and 2011. And he had the gall to say he is proud of paying more taxes!

What if Obama's hidden supporters are allowing the most beatable Republican candidate to compete?

I just do not see Newt beating Obama. The dirt on Newt is legendary, and the recent 10 million bucks source of his campaigning from a Casino Owner is mouthwatering for Democrats.
http://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm#owns

Astrologically, he has a very strong dark side signature:
Pluto square Nessus exact [Generational Aspect yes but it is exact to 0.03 degrees]

Nodal Axis squares LUCIFER exact.

Saturn quincunx LUCIFER exact.

Pluto opposes Kaali [Power-Hunger aspect]

Uranus opp Moon [Can be emotionally unstable]

Sun weakly squared by Neptune: A delusion aspect.

posted January 25, 2012 11:11 AM            

juni, I'm delighted Ron Paul is running for President. He's saying what I've said since the 1980s, long before I ever heard of him.

He's for sound money...money of gold or silver coin..or currency backed up with hard assets held by the federal government and the value of that sound money regulated by the Congress of the United States...per Article I, Section 8. 'Powers of Congress'.."To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures"

He's for a much smaller, less costly, less intrusive federal government which only involves itself in affairs authorized to the federal government by the US Constitution.

He wants US military bases closed around the world and our military personnel withdrawn to America. I've written about that..I believe here...when in a "mood", I suggested we withdraw to fortress America, kick the UN out of America and let the rest of the world go to hell on it's own timetable. I fear this is impractical and that there would be war in Europe or the Middle East..perhaps nuclear or perhaps another world war in which we would be compelled or feel compelled to take sides.

posted January 25, 2012 12:08 PM            

You could be right in this respect. They are all members of the entrenched "Political Class" who constantly endeavor to expand their own prospects for wealth and/or power.

You mentioned Murdoch but failed to take note of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Time, Newsweek, Saloon, Slate and the other assortment of far left loons who pollute the airwaves and destroy forests to print their incoherent rants.

Now, as a practical matter; would you consider taking one subject at a time and consider not lumping a blizzard of subjects into one post?

posted January 25, 2012 01:12 PM            

quote:

---

I don't know who Ron Paul will endorse...if anyone. More likely, Paul wants some of his ideas incorporated in the Republican Party platform at the Republican Party Convention. If so, that would be a gigantic step in the right direction

---

I suspect he won`t endorse Santorum or Newt tho... Romney or no one is my "guess".

posted January 25, 2012 02:01 PM            

Is it possible I've been sleep walking again?

Well, some of what's been said and is still being said about Newt simply isn't true. Some!

When I saw the ad with Newt and Nancy Pee-Lousy sitting on a couch pitching man made global warming I sent Newt an email suggesting...in declarative sentences, that he was either corrupt or incredibly stupid and in either case he had no business anywhere near the levers of power in America.

posted January 25, 2012 02:28 PM            

you said in response to my question:

quote:

---

No but rather because Ron Paul is one of the only members of Congress who knows the difference between money...and federal reserve notes and understands that many of our economic problems can be laid on the doorstep of Federal Reserve policy.
He seems to have adopted an All or nothing at All position.

I'm going to be President or I'm going home.

---

Put it all into context here :
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/000844.html

Guess I need to stop sleepwalking

posted January 25, 2012 07:14 PM            

quote:

---

What if Obama's hidden supporters are allowing the most beatable Republican candidate to compete?

I just do not see Newt beating Obama. The dirt on Newt is legendary, and the recent 10 million bucks source of his campaigning from a Casino Owner is mouthwatering for Democrats

---

btw, awesome site

posted January 26, 2012 12:15 AM            

Are you aware that every single one of those charges was dismissed?

Are you aware that Newt was not fined by the House ethics committee but rather Newt paid some of the costs of the 3 year ethics committee investigation?

Are you aware that Newt did not resign as Speaker of the House in disgrace and that after the investigation and dismissal of the charges that Newt was reelected Speaker and served another term...as Speaker?

Are you aware that Newt did not lobby for Freddie Mac and that his contract specifically excluded any lobbying on behalf of Freddie?

Are you aware Newt actually testified in a House committee meeting and told committee members that Freddie Mac shouldn't be given another penny of taxpayer money in any further bailouts?

There's a lot of crap floating around in cyberspace about Newt. Most of it's not true or it's distorted.

One thing about Newt is true. In almost any room, Newt is the smartest guy there. If O'Bomber should be so unfortunate as to have to run against Newt, I feel sorry for O'Bomber in advance. In any debate against Newt, O'Bomber is going to look like a dull 5th grader going up against a University professor with a Ph.D.

demoscats and their drooling press lapdogs..along with the Republican insider establishment political class want to pick the Republican nominee.

Somehow, I don't think that's going to happen this time around.