Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  The Truth About ‘Electability’

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The Truth About ‘Electability’
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 4792
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 02, 2012 11:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

The truth about ‘electability’
By Yates Walker
02/01/2012

In exit polls yesterday, Florida Republicans revealed that their top reason for choosing their candidate was “electability.” After screaming at my TV for 10 minutes, I had several drinks and sat down to write this column.

John McCain was electable. Wasn’t he?

Tom Daschle, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Howard Dean, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Keith Olbermann, The New York Times and The Washington Post all said he was. McCain was “a great guy” according to Chris Matthews. So why aren’t we in year four of the McCain administration?

Because electability is absolute, unadulterated, straight-out-of-the-cow bullshi(ii)t. And I can prove it with two questions.

1.) Did anyone ever ask if Barack Obama was electable?

Potential candidate liabilities: Obama has a weird name. He’s aloof. He’s an elitist. He spent his formative years in Indonesia. His father was a Muslim. His mother was a Marxist radical. He won’t release his college records. He never served in the military. He never held a job in the private sector. He had a negligible impact as an Illinois state senator. He had a negligible impact as a U.S. senator. He had no foreign policy experience. He had no executive experience. He spent 20 years of Sundays with a lunatic pastor who despises America. He’s a product of the notoriously corrupt Chicago political machine. He had close personal ties to domestic terrorists and other unsavory characters.

2) Did anyone ever ask if Hillary Clinton was electable?

Potential candidate liabilities: She’s a left-wing feminist. She’s not attractive. She has a cold demeanor. She’s not charismatic. She and her husband were scandal-ridden and scandal-prone. She had well-known, shady business dealings. Her life’s major political achievement was staying married to a husband who cheated on her every chance he could. She was an unpopular first lady (until the Lewinsky sympathy). Her only major leadership role (Hillarycare) resulted in abject failure, ultimately causing the Democrats to lose their majority in Congress for the first time in more than three decades. She was a junior senator from New York in the second term of a legislative career without much distinction.

And the answer to each of those questions is no.

The list of potential political liabilities for Hillary and Barack could go on for days. Each had an ideology far to the left of mainstream America. Neither had an executive’s pedigree. Yet, somehow, electability wasn’t an issue for them.

It ain’t a mystery, folks.

The electability question is a liberal media con. It is posed only when discussing Republicans. And it is posed often. The purpose of the question is to cast doubt on conservative candidates and, ultimately, keep them out of office.

And, tragically, it works.

The electability meme doesn’t merely haunt Republican office seekers. It has slithered into the minds of Republican voters, leading them to be unnaturally anxious when conservative candidates take strong stands. The result of this anxiety is manifest. We either lose (see: Bob Dole, John McCain, etc.) or elect callow, mealy-mouthed imps (see: the hordes of GOP congressmen who think compromise is a cardinal virtue). In short, the electability con has been a destructive, weakening force in the conservative movement for generations. And, as dupes, Republicans continually harm themselves.

The 2010 tea party wave crushed the spirit of the Democrats. It was their biggest loss in 70 years. A more limited government was clearly the will of the people. For a few trembling months, the lame-duck Dems and a dispirited President Obama thought the world was ending because fiscal restraint was coming to town. All of the political winds were at Republican backs. Then, John Boehner insisted that he wasn’t in charge. And the capitulations of our just-elected electables soon followed.

That’s the worst part of the electable meme. It’s hard to root for weak candidates. Conservatives love America. And our country wasn’t founded and built by mealy-mouths and second-guessers. America was founded by ass-kickers, men and women who took hard stands, come hell or high water. That’s the type of candidate we want, the type they call “unelectable.” And here’s the kicker: the last one we nominated won 49 states and was re-elected in 1984.

If conservatives can learn anything from Barack Obama, it’s this: Anyone is electable.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 1517
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 02, 2012 02:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Unelectable.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 4792
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 02, 2012 04:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah YoursTrulyAlways; I remember Reagan was painted as the unelectable cowboy who would have his finger on the nuclear trigger and start WW III.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 7474
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 02, 2012 08:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
yes the repubs did win with reagan. however reagan is nowhere to be seen these days. and who was he running against?

IP: Logged

Ami Anne
Moderator

Posts: 27204
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 02, 2012 09:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ami Anne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jwhop:
Yeah YoursTrulyAlways; I remember Reagan was painted as the unelectable cowboy who would have his finger on the nuclear trigger and start WW III.

Yep!!!

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal


http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5820
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 03, 2012 11:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think we're dealing with a lot of wishful thinking in these recent threads.

IP: Logged

juniperb
Moderator

Posts: 3241
From: Blue Star Kachina
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 08, 2012 08:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for juniperb     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Electability. The big word around town these days .

I believe most good folks are tired already. Tired of the negative campaigns, the superpacs and bullbutter involved when nothing is gained...

I am of the opinion that Obama stands the best shot of winning simply because of the GOP canidates running.

quote:

One caucus-goer in Coon Rapids, (MN)truck driver Rod Garberson, said if Paul isn't the fall nominee the Republican Party won't get his vote.

"I gotta tell ya, this time I'm pretty well stuck on not supporting the party even if it means eight years of Obama and we all stand in bread lines for five hours for a sack of potatoes," Garberson said.

Paul finished fourth in Minnesota four years ago with 16 percent.


http://news.yahoo.com/paul-says-gop-result-opens-door-034722386.html


Is that sentiment sweeping the Country?


.

------------------
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it. ~Rumi~

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2012

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a