Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Demoscat's Gender Pay Gap

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Demoscat's Gender Pay Gap
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 5235
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 03:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So, here are the screeching, thumb-sucking, foot stoomping, shrieking demoscats..including O'Bomber, whining about equal pay for women. Guess who doesn't give equal pay to women in the workplace?

If you said...the screeching, thumb-sucking, foot stoomping, shrieking demoscats...including O'Bomber...give yourself a gold star!

demoscats, including O'Bomber are just a bunch of phony baloney lying gas bags of smelly hot air...and not much of anything else.

Women should tell O'Bomber and demoscats to just F-Off!

Senate Dems Betray Lilly
Senate Democrats pay female staffers less than male staffers
Andrew Stiles
May 24, 2012


A group of Democratic female senators on Wednesday declared war on the so-called “gender pay gap,” urging their colleagues to pass the aptly named Paycheck Fairness Act when Congress returns from recess next month. However, a substantial gender pay gap exists in their own offices, a Washington Free Beacon analysis of Senate salary data reveals.

Of the five senators who participated in Wednesday’s press conference—Barbara Mikulski (D., Md.), Patty Murray (D., Wash.), Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.), Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) and Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.)—three pay their female staff members significantly less than male staffers.

Murray, who has repeatedly accused Republicans of waging a “war a women,” is one of the worst offenders. Female members of Murray’s staff made about $21,000 less per year than male staffers in 2011, a difference of 35.2 percent.

That is well above the 23 percent gap that Democrats claim exists between male and female workers nationwide. The figure is based on a 2010 U.S. Census Bureau report, and is technically accurate. However, as CNN’s Lisa Sylvester has reported, when factors such as area of employment, hours of work, and time in the workplace are taken into account, the gap shrinks to about 5 percent.

A significant “gender gap” exists in Feinstein’s office, where women also made about $21,000 less than men in 2011, but the percentage difference—41 percent—was even higher than Murray’s.

Boxer’s female staffers made about $5,000 less, a difference of 7.3 percent.

The Free Beacon used publicly available salary data from the transparency website Legistorm to calculate the figures, and considered only current full-time staff members who were employed for the entirety of fiscal year 2011.

The employee gender pay gap among Senate Democrats was not limited to Murray, Boxer, and Feinstein. Of the 50 members of the Senate Democratic caucus examined in the analysis, 37 senators paid their female staffers less than male staffers.

Senators elected in 2010—Joe Manchin, Chris Coons, and Richard Blumenthal—were not considered due to incomplete salary data.

Women working for Senate Democrats in 2011 pulled in an average salary of $60,877. Men made about $6,500 more.

While the gap is significant, it is slightly smaller than that of the White House, which pays men about $10,000, or 13 percent, more on average, according to a previous Free Beacon analysis.

The pay differential is quite striking in some cases, especially among leading Democrats. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), who runs the Senate Democratic messaging operation, paid men $19,454 more on average, a 36 percent difference.

Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D., Ill.) paid men $13,063 more, a difference of 23 percent.

Other notable Senators whose “gender pay gap” was larger than 23 percent:

•Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.)—47.6 percent
•Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D., N.M.)—40 percent
•Sen. Jon Tester (D., Mont.)—34.2 percent
•Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.)—31.5 percent
•Sen. Tom Carper (D., Del.)—30.4 percent
•Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.)–29.7 percent
•Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.)–29.2 percent
•Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.)—26.5 percent
•Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore)—26.4 percent
•Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa)—23.2 percent
Sen. Sanders, who is an avowed socialist who caucuses with the Democrats, has the worst gender gap by far. He employed more men (14) than women (10), and his chief of staff is male. Like many of his fellow partisans, he has previously accused Republicans of “trying to roll back the clock on women’s rights.”

One possible explanation for the pay disparity is the noticeable preference among Senate Democrats’ for male chiefs of staff, who typically draw the highest congressional salaries. Of the 46 Democratic Senators listing a chief of staff on their payroll in 2011, 13 were women.

A similar disparity exists in the White House, which employs 74 men and only 48 women in senior positions.

Senate Democrats have been actively pushing the issue of equal pay over the past several days. “In 19 of the 20 most common occupations for men or women, women earn less for the same work. We need #EqualPay,” the official Twitter account of Senate Democrats wrote on Tuesday.

Sen. Murray has invoked the so-called GOP “war on women” in fundraising pitches for months. “Women are people. That should be obvious, but apparently it isn’t, at least not to extreme Republicans who see us as mere targets of their political strategy,” she wrote in May 10, 2012, campaign fundraising e-mail.***One of the worst offenders!***

Senate Democrats plan to bring the Paycheck Fairness Act, which some have described as a “trial lawyers’ payday” that would facilitate large punitive damage claims in discrimination suits, up for a vote following the Memorial Day recess.

Congress already passed equal pay legislation in January 2009. President Obama has frequently touted that bill—the Lilly Ledbetter Act—as the first piece of legislation he signed upon taking office, and has sought to declare “problem solved” on the issue of equal pay for women.

“We passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act—the first bill I signed—so that equal pay for equal work is a reality all across this country,” he said in June 2009.

When it comes to prosecuting instances of gender pay discrimination, however, the Obama administration has been far less active than that of his Republican predecessor George W. Bush. Under Obama, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed six gender-based wage discrimination lawsuits. That number is down from 18 lawsuits filed during Bush’s second term.
http://freebeacon.com/senate-dems-betray-lilly/

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5989
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 03:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Now now I have to expose the spin again in this thread?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 5235
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 03:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The spin...is all in your "imagination" acoustic". I've already proved that.

Facts are facts...and all you have are your "imaginary" illusions from your little bubble world of delusional unreality!

Btw acoustic. Do you ever feel even a little guilty screwing over your employer by taking LindaLand breaks when you're supposed to be working on their behalf? Just wondering! What a guy!

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5989
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 03:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Luckily, right off the bat we have the source of the information: http://www.legistorm.com/browse_by_last_name.html

Click on a name

Note the note at the bottom of each page:

    Congressional staff salaries shown are the amount paid in the period shown. They are not annual salaries. Because bonuses may be included here and other payments may not be (most notably with aides working for multiple offices or for a political campaign committee), please use caution in extrapolating annual salaries from the figures shown here.

    We have taken great care to have this website reflect the official record, but we have discovered a handful of errors both in the official record and our own transcription. If you believe our information is in error, please let us know so we can fix it as soon as possible. We take accuracy very seriously.

So right off the bat, we're not dealing with annual salaries, which means we're not even dealing with equal amounts of time. No wonder the Conservatives trying to make this play resorted to averaging in their attempt to spin this rather obvious nonsense.

The obvious truth remains. If such a pay disparity existed involving Democratic women in government, there's no way in hell they wouldn't be talking about it. Who's talking about it, though? The Republicans. Shifty Republicans.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5989
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 03:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
The spin...is all in your "imagination" acoustic". I've already proved that.

You have PROVED no such thing ever. You posted more articles. That is not proving. They're all based on the same flawed premise.

quote:
Facts are facts...and all you have are your "imaginary" illusions from your little bubble world of delusional unreality!

Yes, facts are facts. You don't deal in facts, however. You deal in spun information, and that is not a general statement disclaiming what you've said. It's an objective statement regarding the intentional spin your articles on this matter have put out.

quote:
Btw acoustic. Do you ever feel even a little guilty screwing over your employer by taking LindaLand breaks when you're supposed to be working on their behalf? Just wondering! What a guy!

I know it's quite uncomfortable on your part for me to be here undoing all your nonsense.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 5989
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 24, 2012 07:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I admit, sometimes I revel in embarrassing Jwhop.

In absolute terms...there is literally nothing that can be inferred from the data at legistorm, because you have no idea how much a particular person worked. There's no count of hours. There are general dates only. Maybe there is on the actual pdf from the Congressional offices, but I haven't decided to pay for Pro access on their site.

Despite all this, they do have handy sorting tools, so you can look at Senators and their staffers. I saw Barbara Boxer listed in Jwhop's poor article, and she's a Californian like me, so I went there. As anyone debating this issue would I sought people of the same position. Towards the bottom of the page I found multiple Staff Assistants. Any comparison of wage should be across the exact same position.

Ryan C. Tenney
Staff Assistant
04/01/11 - 09/30/11
Amount $16,500

Donna M. Strain
Staff Assistant
04/01/11 - 09/30/11 (obstensibly the same time frame)
Amount $19,499.92

Whoops! Literally the first two opposite gender people in the same position produces a result that shows the woman makes more money. How inconvenient. Oh, let me go back and put in web addresses so that this can be verified.

Found another Staff Assistant from the same time period. As confirmed via LinkedIn, it's a female.

Zaira J. Roa
Staff Assistant
04/01/11 - 09/30/11
Amount $17,363

That's two women of the same position whose salaries beat that of their male counterpart.

This is how things unravel, Jwhop.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2012

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a