posted September 15, 2012 01:52 PM            

however, progressives are not the same as socialist/commie/marxists and by putting them all in the same bracket with Liberals or Leftists is just a lazy, narrowminded and unproductive MO. IMO

posted September 15, 2012 01:58 PM            

quote:

---

failure to heartily endorse signifies disapproval?

---

Tell me the last time I entered a policy debate with, "You're racist." Failure to follow the edict leading up to statement being put out there signifies disapproval. Duh.

This is just ridiculously lame.

It's lame on the basis that you're making Democrats as not about the truth, when you so often get the truth wrong.

It's lame on the basis of trying to lump all Democrats or left-leaning people into having a single ideology.

It's lame on the basis that reducing arguments to non-salient terms is something YOU engage in all the time, and now you're attempting to demonize people that do AS YOU DO!

posted September 15, 2012 02:17 PM            

it's not my way. i avoid pigeonholes to the best of my ability and spend most of my time here trying to expose the very pigeon-hole approach you use consistently.

posted September 15, 2012 03:01 PM            

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD, CALL THEM RACISTS.

Why not? Because they believe wholeheartedly in the lying tactic. Why do they believe in the bottom feeding tactic?

Because the truth means nothing to leftists.

End of the story. Case proved.

posted September 16, 2012 11:55 AM            

and of course, in november it will be a lameduck congress, so despite what is going on in the middle east they are not planning on doing anything, really, for the next 3-4 months. except, probably, complaining if obama tries to DO anything about the sitch in the middle east or anywhere else.

they are paid what, 175K/year? let's a)dock them two months pay, that would be about 3 months each; and b) fire their butts and replace them on the 6th before they try to come back.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/after-next-week-house-stopping-work-until-election-20120914

maybe one day there will be an admission that the democrats don't have a monopoly on stupidity and self-interest.

posted September 16, 2012 02:43 PM            

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD SAY REPUBLICANS ARE RACISTS.

posted September 16, 2012 04:52 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
And still, the usual suspects continue to run their mouths and flap their lips...about everything..other than any show of even mild disapproval over one of their loony-tunes brothers saying...[b]LIE, LIE, LIE.

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD SAY REPUBLICANS ARE RACISTS.

It's hysterically funny that leftists think no one notices that when one of their coven of leftists gets caught red handed....they try to change the subject. [/B]

---

The democrat of yesterday was nothing like these people. Our grandparents and great grandparents would NEVER recognize the circus called the Democratic party.

It is truly a 3 ring circus

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted September 16, 2012 07:41 PM            

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD, CALL REPUBLICANS RACISTS.

And no one is supposed to notice that the usual suspects are attempting to change the subject. Delicious!

posted September 16, 2012 08:26 PM            

America is not in Bible Prophecy? WHY? Perhaps, it became a 2nd rate power with no influence on the global scene. I don't know.

At any rate, this election IS the choice between two entirely different ways of life for all the people of the US.

I am in a pivotal state, Thank Goodness.

That does help me feel a little more empowered.

They will try to steal it. Can they? Romney needs to win big enough to overcome the stealing, as they will try.

posted September 17, 2012 12:01 PM            

That's the reason you're still here flapping your lips, ducking, bobbing, weaving and evading showing even the mildest disapproval of your little leftist loony-tunes brother telling the other leftist loons to...LIE, LIE, LIE...

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD, SAY REPUBLICANS ARE RACISTS..

posted September 17, 2012 12:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ami Anne:
In all honesty AG, if O'Bomber wins, America is over as a first rate power. That is what hinges on this election.

---

Excuse me, Ami. What first rate power has a credit rating of "AA-" with negative outlook by a US rating agency? DaGong, the rating agency of the US's largest creditor rates US debt at "A" with (negative outlook).

posted September 17, 2012 12:24 PM            

I am offended by your vitriol.

These attacks on people you call "leftist loons" only show the glaring deficiencies in your own character.

posted September 17, 2012 12:29 PM            

Now Faith, do you want to take a shot at showing some disapproval of a moronic leftist loon telling his fellow activist loons to....LIE, LIE, LIE...

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD, SAY REPUBLICANS ARE RACISTS.

posted September 17, 2012 12:52 PM            

Posting an article that advocates YOUR favorite diversion tactic, which is changing the narrative to something else isn't EVER going to win you points. This is you looking in the mirror once again. You're upset at people or a person that advocates CHANGING THE SUBJECT. That's got YOUR name all over it, buddy! Just look at my thread titled Romney's Foreign Policy Blunders. Thanks to YOUR influence you're on the topic of British colonialism. You might oddly think that wasn't YOUR diversion, but it was. You decided to latch on to the LEAST important aspect of IQ's post in order to form your rebuttal. You didn't CHOOSE to tackle the MEAT of his argument.

No, I'm sorry. I will not be seen as wrong in this thread where you attack a Democrat for doing exactly as you do.

Nor will I be seen as wrong for not denouncing behavior I don't engage in, just as a good, devout Catholic priest wouldn't be seen as wrong for not choosing to speak out on the ills of the greater church. An individual is judged on their own character, and what they choose to engage in. We DON'T live in a FANTASYLAND where we have to PRETEND to be OUTRAGED at every sin we see associated with some faction we may be part of. You didn't say a word against the Mohammad video that inflamed those people in Egypt and Libya, did you? No outrage whatsoever. It was most certainly an ill-advised production, and you defended it with the First Amendment. Well, the First Amendment also covers the douche in your lead-in article in this thread. I'm not invoking that in defense of what he said (as I know you'd be apt to latch on to), but rather illustrating in rather literal terms the folly of your position here.

posted September 17, 2012 01:42 PM            

oh no not more "civility" from jwhop?

it may not have occurred to you jwhop but you do enough slamming of the dems all by yourself that no one else gets a look in. it might seem fun to you if we all just agreed how bad the dems are, but your strictly one-pronged approach leaves it to the rest of us to point out that not only the dems house poisonous creatures in their midst.

posted September 17, 2012 03:38 PM            

You approve wholeheartedly!

Hell, you weren't even outraged when one of your loony-tunes leftist pacs supporting your little Marxist Messiah O'Bomber put a liar in an ad claiming Romney killed his wife.

There is no bottom level to the pit of lies leftists are willing to descend to. There is no line which leftists are will to draw and say...this far and no farther.

So, we get a loony-tunes moron leftist exhorting his fellow loon activists to...LIE, LIE, LIE....

DON'T TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN POLICY. INSTEAD, SAY REPUBLICANS ARE RACISTS.

And then, we get the usual suspects circling the wagons and avoiding any discouraging words against those blatant lies and trying to change the subject.

posted September 17, 2012 03:58 PM            

quote:

---

I know damned well that you're in no way outraged by the outrageous lies deliberately hatched by your little moronic leftist brothers.
You approve wholeheartedly!

---

No. You're very much in possession of the knowledge that I don't go for that sort of thing. You've had encounter after encounter with me, and this has never been MY tactic.

That means in no uncertain terms that you're lying right here for all to see.

quote:

---

Hell, you weren't even outraged when one of your loony-tunes leftist pacs supporting your little Marxist Messiah O'Bomber put a liar in an ad claiming Romney killed his wife.

---

Just because I'm now aware of it, because I searched "white supremecist" to make my point here, doesn't mean I'm obligated to say a thing about it, though I am white. I'm not a white supremecist myself, and I can rest assured that people know my character well enough to know that I wouldn't be associated with that.

You continue not to be in a position to talk about rational people. Rational people don't post something vaguely having to do with other people, and claim that they all must be the same. Rational people recognize that you've posted an article that espouses one of YOUR primary argument techniques. When are you going to address that?