posted March 28, 2013 12:44 PM            

Americans are migrating from less-free liberal states to more-free conservative states, where they are doing better economically, according to a new study published Thursday by the George Mason University's Mercatus Center.

The "Freedom in the 50 States" study measured economic and personal freedom using a wide range of criteria, including tax rates, government spending and debt, regulatory burdens, and state laws covering land use, union organizing, gun control, education choice and more.

It found that the freest states tended to be conservative "red" states, while the least free were liberal "blue" states.

The freest state overall, the researchers concluded, was North Dakota, followed by South Dakota, Tennessee, New Hampshire and Oklahoma. The least free state by far was New York, followed by California, New Jersey, Hawaii and Rhode Island.

The study also compared its measures of economic and personal freedom to population shifts and income growth, and found that freer states tend to do better on both scores than those less free.

For example, it found a strong correlation between a state's freedom ranking and migration, which means that Americans are gravitating toward states that have less-intrusive governments.

"People are voting for places with greater freedom," said William Ruger, a political scientist at Texas State University and one of the co-authors of the study. That was true, he said, even after controlling for things like weather and amenities that might attract people to states independent of these freedom measures.

The study also found that states with more freedom tended to see stronger income growth. This was particularly true in states with more regulatory freedom.

"Adam Smith was right," Ruger said. "If you have economic freedom you will have economic growth."

IBD has previously reported that red states saw stronger job growth, lower unemployment and bigger gains in per capita income than blue states, during the economic recovery.

The data also show that blue states have generally become less free over the past decade, while red states have tended to gain additional levels of freedom. The states with the biggest declines in freedom were Wyoming, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Kansas. Those with the biggest gains were Oklahoma, North Dakota, Idaho, Utah and New Mexico.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, the researchers found that conservative states are just as likely as liberal ones to score well on measures of personal freedom, which looked at laws covering marijuana use, gambling, marriage rights, alcohol and tobacco use, gun control, victimless crimes and the like.

"Personal freedom does not relate straightforwardly to the left-right spectrum at all," the study noted.

The study's findings also call into question claims made repeatedly by President Obama during last year's campaign that tax cuts and deregulation won't produce growth and prosperity.

"They tell us," he said in one speech, that "if we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes — especially for the wealthy — our economy will grow stronger."

"Here's the problem," he said. "It doesn't work. It has never worked."

But if anything, the data show precisely the opposite.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/032813-649561-americans-are-migrating-to-more-free-republican-states.aspx

What I think would be interesting is comparing this data to mental health data.

North Dakota and South Dakota are both in the same quintile as California for well being according to Gallup: http://www.businessinsider.com/happiest-states-2013-2?op=1
While Tennessee (3rd-most free state) is in the bottom quintile (the least happy). I've noticed before that Tennessee rates dismally on measures of happiness and mental health (I've noticed because some of my immediate family live there.). Tennessee is actually ranked 47th overall in terms of well being by Gallup.
New Hampshire's in the top quintile, Hawaii is number one in terms of well being, and Oklahoma is in the bottom.

posted March 28, 2013 01:21 PM            

and the strike BREAKERS are all people from those "right to work" states who are attracted by the bigger paychecks available in california.

posted March 28, 2013 02:46 PM            

Those free states are also highest in all the bad things, infant mortality, mental illness, obesity, you get the drift.

who would be ok in OK anyway??? pardon me anyone from Oklahoma.

posted April 09, 2013 04:55 PM            

It’s also worth noting that the net number of people who moved to or from a state in 2010 was quite small. The biggest gainer (Alaska) and biggest loser (Michigan) both gained or lost around one-half of one percent of their population in 2010. The other states saw less than that, sometimes quite a bit less.

In other words, upwards of 99.5 percent of every state’s population was happy enough with state tax policy (or with any other factor, including the weather) to stay put.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/apr/09/are-americans-flocking-low-tax-states/

That article also backs what you said about the Dakotas, Kat:

posted April 09, 2013 06:29 PM            

ironically many americans have emigrated to europe, where - we are told things are even worse.