posted September 05, 2013 10:17 PM            

quote:

---

Ummm, excuse me delusional one, but could you be specific about the "nonsense" you say you perceive?

---

Why you'd ever have any doubt as to the nonsense I perceive is beyond me.

quote:

---

"the terrorists, (in Iraq) are ballsy"...for killing unarmed innocent civilians they don't know....acoustic

Speaking of "praise"..now that looks like praise!

---

posted September 05, 2013 11:02 PM            

ORDO AB CHAO - ORDER OUT OF CHAOS

Thats what they live by. Knock down buildings in your own country and claim they were muslims. The u.s says there was sarin used and thats it. Everyone has to believe it and the u.s rules the world!

Oh wow everything else was incinerated but only a koran intact found st ground zero.

God people are so gullible.

Wake up North America!!!!

posted September 06, 2013 01:01 AM            

Yeah acoustic, it takes a lot of courage to open up with automatic weapons on unarmed men, women and children.

It takes a lot of courage to hide behind the skirts of women and children while you're shooting at US military personnel...knowing they won't return fire on you for fear of hitting innocent civilians.

Yeah acoustic, that makes those terrorists "ballsy" in your little bubble world of unreality.

The most egregious part of what you said was that the terrorists are ballsy...because they were killing people they don't know...and you were talking about killing unarmed civilians, including women and children and not US soldiers.

posted September 06, 2013 08:10 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
Yeah acoustic, you were really pumped by "ballsy" terrorists deliberately killing innocent, unarmed Iraqi civilians in Iraq.

Yeah acoustic, it takes a lot of courage to open up with automatic weapons on unarmed men, women and children.

It takes a lot of courage to hide behind the skirts of women and children while you're shooting at US military personnel...knowing they won't return fire on you for fear of hitting innocent civilians.

Yeah acoustic, that makes those terrorists "ballsy" in your little bubble world of unreality.

The most egregious part of what you said was that the terrorists are ballsy...[b]because they were killing people they don't know...and you were talking about killing unarmed civilians, including women and children and not US soldiers.

And now would be a good time for you to state with particularity what I've said that you perceive to be nonsense.[/B]

---

Have some truth with my coffee, today. It is a good day

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted September 06, 2013 01:26 PM            

quote:

---

The most egregious part of what you said was that the terrorists are ballsy...because they were killing people they don't know...and you were talking about killing unarmed civilians, including women and children and not US soldiers.

---

Listen to yourself. If it's so easy, why isn't everyone doing it? Is it just the law? Do you follow Louis C.K.'s humorous philosophy on the matter? And if they're so cowardly, why aren't the attempts at killing underhanded like poison? That could be called cowardly. Taking up a gun with the intent of doing damage against an armed American foe would not be near the top of the list of most cowardly things to do.

There was nothing remotely egregious in what I said.

quote:

---

And now would be a good time for you to state with particularity what I've said that you perceive to be nonsense.

---

Yet another instance of your inability to understand things. ♫You probably think this post is about you, don't you, don't you? ♪

When I see the ignorance of these people, the low information voters, I cry.

Our country is being lost and these people are as stupid as the people in Nazi Germany when Hitler was coming to power and thinking he was about hope and change.

On top of that, they think they are so smart. ~ Ami Anne

Amazing how people opine absolute nonsense, and think they're the smart ones, huh?

That's pretty much what everyone here thinks, and that's certainly true when they're considering your ideas as well. ~AG

posted September 06, 2013 11:36 PM            

"Yet another instance of your inability to understand things. ♫You probably think this post is about you, don't you, don't you?" ��...acoustic

So, When are you going to get off your dead butt and state what you perceive to be nonsense that I've said acoustic?

"The most egregious part of what you said (acoustic) was that the terrorists are ballsy...because they were killing people they don't know...and you were talking about killing unarmed civilians, including women and children and not US soldiers."..jwhop

"Listen to yourself. If it's so easy, why isn't everyone doing it? Is it just the law? Do you follow Louis C.K.'s humorous philosophy on the matter? And if they're so cowardly, why aren't the attempts at killing underhanded like poison? That could be called cowardly. Taking up a gun with the intent of doing damage against an armed American foe would not be near the top of the list of most cowardly things to do."..acoustic

Duh, I know you think you addressed what I said but no rational person would think so.

Why isn't everyone doing what?

Is it what law?

Louis C.K. has a humorous philosophy on terrorists killing innocent unarmed civilians?

Who said anything about terrorists being cowards for shooting at US military personnel?

Hello Dopey, I said they were cowards for using women and children to shield themselves...while they were shooting at US military personnel.

posted September 11, 2013 04:49 PM            

quote:

---

Duh, I know you think you addressed what I said but no rational person would think so.

---

I don't think you're in a position to speak for "rational" people.

I would answer your questions, except that what I wrote is pretty clear.

posted September 11, 2013 04:51 PM            

Do you want me to take you to rational school ?

I will put you across my knee and slap you silly( and you won't like it )

------------------
Want To Ask Any Question About Bible Prophecy? Go For it. It is Free, of course.

posted September 11, 2013 11:37 PM            

Wrong delusional one.

Long ago..when you attempted to fluff up and polish up the image of terrorists in Iraq, I said both.

You said terrorists..in Iraq were ballsy for killing people they didn't know.

It takes no courage to open up with automatic weapons on unarmed civilians...many of whom were women and children. Nothing counter-intuitive about calling such people cowards.

posted September 12, 2013 08:10 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
"You're now claiming that you said that they were cowards for using women and children to shield themselves. That wasn't the original context of your comment, now, was it? No, you claimed that terrorists were cowards for killing innocent people (which is counter-intuitive to most people)."...acoustic

Wrong delusional one.

Long ago..when you attempted to fluff up and polish up the image of terrorists in Iraq, I said both.

You said terrorists..in Iraq were ballsy for killing people they didn't know.

It takes no courage to open up with automatic weapons on unarmed civilians...many of whom were women and children. Nothing counter-intuitive about calling such people cowards.

I'll file this one away as the leftist definition of "courage".

---

Geez Louise
No wonder civilization is crumbling

PS black humor

------------------
Want To Ask Any Question About Bible Prophecy? Go For it. It is Free, of course.

posted September 26, 2013 10:51 PM            

Poll: Americans Think Putin More Effective Than Obama on Syria
AWR Hawkins 26 Sep 2013

A recently released YouGov poll shows that Americans overwhelming believe Russian President Vladimir Putin has been far more effective during the Syrian chemical weapons crisis than President Obama.
In fact, it was not even close.

When asked, "Which world leader was most effective during the Syrian chemical weapons crisis?", 49 percent of Americans gave the nod to Putin while only 25 percent pointed to Obama.

Among Republicans, the ratio was 63 percent for Putin to only 7 percent for Obama. Democrats gave Obama just under 50 percent approval while giving Putin 37 percent.