Author
|
Topic: Kucinich: Obama Risking World War III, Not To Mention Impeachment
|
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 46606 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted September 06, 2013 08:19 PM
http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/2013/09/kucinich-obama-risking-world-war-iii-mention-impeachment/ ------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 155 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 06, 2013 09:24 PM
Lol what a circus. Has nobody noticed that we are distinctly NOT taking action? I wonder why, if Obama wanted to disregard congress abd "rush into war" he is taking it to congress and the people?Could it be (gasp) that he is talking tough to get the diplomatic solution he was pushing for and putin refused point blank? Are you so blinded by the rush propaganda you can't see that the president, whom the PTB expect to do their military bidding, is doing the exact opposite? As did kennedy in the cuban missile crisis, and got what he was really after, a no-nukes agreement w russia. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 155 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 06, 2013 09:26 PM
Edit bad analogyIP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 6261 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 06, 2013 11:51 PM
Let's see: O'Bomber decided to take the issue to congress because he couldn't put together a coalition to take on Assad. Kind of like...what if I threw a war party and no one came! So now O'Bomber is hoping congress will not back him so he can blame Republicans. But the rejection of O'Bomber's plan to bomb Syria is a bipartisan affair. If O'Bomber planned to take Assad out...and I mean kill him, then he would have lots of support. But, O'Bomber says the purpose of the bombing campaign is not regime change in Syria. If it's not to get Assad out of there, then why are we doing it? O'Bomber is just the typical illogical, irrational leftist.
IP: Logged |