Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Kucinich: Obama Risking World War III, Not To Mention Impeachment

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Kucinich: Obama Risking World War III, Not To Mention Impeachment
Ami Anne
Moderator

Posts: 46606
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010

posted September 06, 2013 08:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ami Anne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/2013/09/kucinich-obama-risking-world-war-iii-mention-impeachment/

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal


http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 155
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted September 06, 2013 09:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Lol what a circus. Has nobody noticed that we are distinctly NOT taking action? I wonder why, if Obama wanted to disregard congress abd "rush into war" he is taking it to congress and the people?

Could it be (gasp) that he is talking tough to get the diplomatic solution he was pushing for and putin refused point blank? Are you so blinded by the rush propaganda you can't see that the president, whom the PTB expect to do their military bidding, is doing the exact opposite?

As did kennedy in the cuban missile crisis, and got what he was really after, a no-nukes agreement w russia.

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 155
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted September 06, 2013 09:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Edit bad analogy

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 6261
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 06, 2013 11:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Let's see: O'Bomber decided to take the issue to congress because he couldn't put together a coalition to take on Assad. Kind of like...what if I threw a war party and no one came!

So now O'Bomber is hoping congress will not back him so he can blame Republicans. But the rejection of O'Bomber's plan to bomb Syria is a bipartisan affair.

If O'Bomber planned to take Assad out...and I mean kill him, then he would have lots of support. But, O'Bomber says the purpose of the bombing campaign is not regime change in Syria. If it's not to get Assad out of there, then why are we doing it?

O'Bomber is just the typical illogical, irrational leftist.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2013

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a