Author
|
Topic: The GOP's Alternative To Obamacare
|
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 27, 2014 07:40 PM
Despite more than three dozen failed efforts to repeal Obamacare in the House, a trio of Republican Senators is going to give it at least one more try by forwarding their own alternative to the Affordable Care Act. Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah, Richard Burr of North Carolina and Tom Coburn from Oklahoma, are pushing non-mandated health care coverage, but still would require insurers to offer coverage. The group’s proposal – dubbed the Patient Choice, Affordability, Responsibility and Empowerment, or CARE, Act — would expand the maximum premium ratio between the healthiest consumers and the sickest would be 5-to-1, wider than Obamacare’s 3-to-1 ratio. Individual states, however, could loosen or tighten the ratio on their own if they passed their own laws.Insurers would be prohibited from dropping individuals purely because of health status. Further, any consumer who has received “continuous coverage” from any insurer for at least the past 18 months could not be denied a health policy from other insurers if they switch plans and wouldn’t be forced to pay higher premiums. But there is no mention of simply denying coverage if an individual has had none. And presumably, the higher pricing ratio would help insurers cover costs. “The American people have found out what is in Obamacare — broken promises in the form of increased health care costs, costly mandates, and government bureaucracy. They don’t like it and don’t want to keep it,” Burr said in a prepared statement. “Our nation’s health care system was unsustainable before Obamacare, and the president’s health care plan made things worse.” Other changes the legislation proposes include offering tax breaks on health policies for those making up to 300% of the federal poverty level, or $34,470 as of 2013, instead of Obamacare’s 400% level. It also would put caps on Medicaid, limit medical malpractice lawsuits and would cap the tax breaks that employers get for offering coverage to bring them in line with individuals who pay for their own insurance. The senators say the proposal is designed to limit the costs that Obamacare imposes in higher out-of-pocket costs on premiums and deductibles, as well as eliminate mandates that they claim are driving up the price of health care. Officials from the White House and the industry trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans had no immediate comment. But it’s unlikely the proposal would make it out of the Senate, and even less likely President Obama would sign it. http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2014/01/27/gop-senators-seek-obamacares-repeal-and-offer-an-alternative/ IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 28, 2014 02:36 PM
No mandate.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 29, 2014 02:49 PM
It will be a smooth transition once Obamacare is repealed.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 07, 2014 10:11 PM
 IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 3811 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted February 13, 2014 07:43 PM
Ironically, Obamacare was mostly created (as an idea) by the Heritage Foundation (conservative think tank) as an alternative to what Hillary Clinton (as First Lady) proposed, and while there were many Republicans who rejected it it was also pushed by more than one Republican since then as "responsibility." Romney pretty much passed it in his own state before Obama so you should call it Romneycare, and Bush also "socialized" medicine a little for the elderly (no doubt paid to by Wall Street, like how he used to be a bigger supporter of the Kyoto Treaty than Gore was back when Enron stood to make billions from it and was a major contributor to his campaigns, but after they were no longer viable and stop sending trucks full of cash over then Bush changed his position on that). Of course once Obama ran with it then it instantly became evil and Republicans acted as if they had nothing to do with it. But then I've noticed both sides measure an issue or action by which side does it rather than what's actually done and don't hesitate to rewrite their own history. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8460 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 14, 2014 12:30 PM
You can still find the video of Gingrich pushing the individual mandate. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 14, 2014 12:41 PM
That idiot is a Liberal in sheep's clothing.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 15, 2014 12:53 PM
I would be against it no matter which party is associated.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 37688 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 21, 2014 11:54 PM
Newt the Knucklehead. IP: Logged |