Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Bye Bye Politics - The Venus Project

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bye Bye Politics - The Venus Project
Voix_de_la_Mer
Knowflake

Posts: 1011
From: You.
Registered: Aug 2011

posted August 18, 2014 09:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Voix_de_la_Mer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Apparently, The Venus Project - a resource-based economy - could eliminate the need for politics, war, and most social issues.

The founders believe that all the social issues we have are as a result of scarcity. Scarcity being the foundation of the monetary system.

They believe if everyone's needs are met, there would be little reason for war, crime, politics, and no need for money at all.
http://www.thevenusproject.com/

Thoughts?

IP: Logged

Voix_de_la_Mer
Knowflake

Posts: 1011
From: You.
Registered: Aug 2011

posted August 19, 2014 01:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Voix_de_la_Mer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bump.

IP: Logged

juniperb
Moderator

Posts: 8251
From: Blue Star Kachina
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 19, 2014 06:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for juniperb     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi Voix, I`m on my old crap-a-tron right now and can`t look at the link but bumping so I won`t forget when I get old faithful back.

------------------
Christian, Jew, Muslim, Shaman, Zoroastrian, stone, ground, mountain, river, each has a secret way of being with the Mystery, unique and not to be judged.
Rumi

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Moderator

Posts: 5019
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted August 19, 2014 08:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That was refreshing.

I'm pessimistic in regards to human nature, both its tribal circuits in the brain with ego and the fact that might will make right (as in get away with doing what they want and writing the history, lesson programs, and the news to their preference) so unless a large majority of people can be converted to such thought then it won't happen as those who embrace war will conquer those who don't. Many realize our mode of living is dysfunctional at best, and quite possibly unsustainable in the long term, but there's a psychology at work that prefers the familiar to the novel and strange. Most don't want to learn new ways, and I don't see it as all that different to those raised with abuse who prefer abusive partners even though they hate the results.

On top of that the majority of people are selfish...not to be confused with malicious (I believe the truly malicious are as rare as the truly kind)...and such people aren't inclined to "do something for nothing," that is if they scratch your back then they want their own scratched in return. This isn't necessarily bad, it can be quite fair when gone about the right way, but it does beg the question of why a society would be run by volunteers. If money isn't the reason then what is? I can see alternatives (anything that aids survival, comfort, clout, etc) but those alternatives then come with similar problems as money, including competition.

And I agree with him on values, but those values are already in place and show in our ideology. Values determine WHAT gets done, ideology on HOW it gets done. When the Soviet took over Russia, for example, pollution and industrialization continued as the values remained the same, only HOW it was done (determined by ideology) changed. Even anarchist systems (from old Iceland to the Spanish Anarchists during the Spanish Civil War) reflected the values of the people (both the good and the bad) as much as any other ideology.

If this wasn't true then we'd have already revolutionized our society, but our species has already made its choice.

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Moderator

Posts: 5019
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted August 19, 2014 08:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DP

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Moderator

Posts: 5019
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted August 19, 2014 08:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Furthermore, there's just plain nasty people. Minor example, I got tired of sweeping up broken glass around a park (among other places), though it was just thoughtlessness, and I put up a brief sign that was as polite (not accusatory) as I could on the damage broken glass does to the tires of bicyclists, a danger to the skateboarding kids (there was a skatepark there), and the animals that get it on their paws and might even lick it off. But I took the sign down when I went past it a couple of days later to see someone busted over a score of bottles by it (and more around the park).

On a similar note, someone arranged for a nail at a gazebo at the park to stick out so it could cut or stick people (I fixed it) and I spent a day biking home picking up tacks someone left alone the bike path to flatten our tires (I collected over 20 by the time I got home). There are a lot of nasty people in the world and they have to be considered when thinking of creating something like a utopia. Even if our dysfunctional society breeds them there's still the question of whether the wound can heal before the rot is burned out of the body, which can be a disturbing thought to follow to the solution...and that those who would do "what must be done" to eradicate such nasty people are the last ones to set up a utopia.

And a nitpick is that there will always be weapons. They're simply too useful, such as knives. Even guns are necessary for the farms (at least the traditional ones). And as long as any weapon exist then the potential for abuse also exist. Even if the weapons were somehow completely removed by currently impossible means (and keep in mind that weapons, including projectile ones, are created even in Supermax prisons out of ordinary materials, and they don't have access to 3D printing of firearms) then there's the potential of the abuse by the strong of the weak. It really goes back to our world is one of might makes right (not that I'm saying it's right, but that they'll win, as one put it war doesn't determine who is right, only who is left, and the ones who are left make the society what it is).

And it's not "just nations" that dispute over territory. Individuals do it as well. Without some mean of defining private property then there will be arguments (which can escalate) over who gets what and when. Make it "shared property" and then many people take the attitude that it's care is someone else's responsibility (goes back to the selfish nature of humanity, and larger the society the less accountability of the individual). And this man has failed to account for this (though I'm sure it's because he himself would be above that--and his failure is not understanding most others would not be, and that the nation-states are themselves made up of individuals who will retain the same nature even without the funny hat of government).

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Moderator

Posts: 5019
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted August 19, 2014 08:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Have you heard of Buckminster Fuller?

Lots of other pioneering ideas in little ways have also been demonstrated as well. Just one example, the hempcar.

But again, our species has already made its choice.

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 2046
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted August 20, 2014 11:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was thinking of Bucky Fuller too PJ.
As he pointed out these kinds of changes may be necessary to our survival. ..but they can't be legislated; he believed a change in the design/technology we use could not only save but thrive us

BUT that people would not make those changes till all other options were exhausted and the necessity made it attractive. So he made his designs so they would be available when people needed them.

He also wrote about the origins of "power-over" and protection rackets quite humorously in the Grunch book...

IP: Logged

Voix_de_la_Mer
Knowflake

Posts: 1011
From: You.
Registered: Aug 2011

posted August 21, 2014 08:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Voix_de_la_Mer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by PixieJane:
That was refreshing.

I'm pessimistic in regards to human nature, both its tribal circuits in the brain with ego and the fact that might will make right (as in get away with doing what they want and writing the history, lesson programs, and the news to their preference) so unless a large majority of people can be converted to such thought then it won't happen as those who embrace war will conquer those who don't. Many realize our mode of living is dysfunctional at best, and quite possibly unsustainable in the long term, but there's a psychology at work that prefers the familiar to the novel and strange. Most don't want to learn new ways, and I don't see it as all that different to those raised with abuse who prefer abusive partners even though they hate the results.

On top of that the majority of people are selfish...not to be confused with malicious (I believe the truly malicious are as rare as the truly kind)...and such people aren't inclined to "do something for nothing," that is if they scratch your back then they want their own scratched in return. This isn't necessarily bad, it can be quite fair when gone about the right way, but it does beg the question of why a society would be run by volunteers. If money isn't the reason then what is? I can see alternatives (anything that aids survival, comfort, clout, etc) but those alternatives then come with similar problems as money, including competition.

And I agree with him on values, but those values are already in place and show in our ideology. Values determine WHAT gets done, ideology on HOW it gets done. When the Soviet took over Russia, for example, pollution and industrialization continued as the values remained the same, only HOW it was done (determined by ideology) changed. Even anarchist systems (from old Iceland to the Spanish Anarchists during the Spanish Civil War) reflected the values of the people (both the good and the bad) as much as any other ideology.

If this wasn't true then we'd have already revolutionized our society, but our species has already made its choice.


I understand your concerns Pixiejane.
For this, or any change to roll out, it will need to be on a one-to-one basis.
Mass change here is not likely, I think.
However, if each individual started making small changes in their own perception of self and life, eventually, all will make a whole.
We may not see it in our lifetime, but everyone who starts in their own life now, can keep it rolling.

I think if an example community could be created in each country of the world, it would show in real-time how it could work to others.
Most people are understandably afraid to lose their "security" (as false as it may be), and so it may take small groups of those who are more afraid to be limited by false security, to create living examples.

Then there will be proof. Everyone deserves proof. With proof, there is no need to convert.

I fully intend to create a resource-based home in this life. It is my hope it will expand into a community. There are people already doing it in some parts of the UK.

Oh, and no, I haven't heard of Buckminster Fuller, thank you for the heads-up.

IP: Logged

Voix_de_la_Mer
Knowflake

Posts: 1011
From: You.
Registered: Aug 2011

posted August 21, 2014 08:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Voix_de_la_Mer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by juniperb:
Hi Voix, I`m on my old crap-a-tron right now and can`t look at the link but bumping so I won`t forget when I get old faithful back.


"Crap-a-tron" haha, OK, I look forward to your thoughts Juniper.

IP: Logged

Voix_de_la_Mer
Knowflake

Posts: 1011
From: You.
Registered: Aug 2011

posted August 21, 2014 08:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Voix_de_la_Mer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Catalina:
I was thinking of Bucky Fuller too PJ.
As he pointed out these kinds of changes may be necessary to our survival. ..but they can't be legislated; he believed a change in the design/technology we use could not only save but thrive us

BUT that people would not make those changes till all other options were exhausted and the necessity made it attractive. So he made his designs so they would be available when people needed them.

He also wrote about the origins of "power-over" and protection rackets quite humorously in the Grunch book...


Thank you for responding Catalina.
I, too, think these changes are necessary for our survival.
The current systems are weakening people, and soon we will lose even those who have been trying to fight the sicknesses.

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Moderator

Posts: 5019
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted August 21, 2014 06:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Proof won't work, just as it doesn't for people in other dysfunctional relationships. And survival is a stronger instinct than idealism (and it's amazing what the guns of the state can do to make those survival instincts kick in). You seem to be making the mistake that deep down people are like you and just need a little inspiration, but that's not the case. Likewise, this isn't all new, there's always been a small minority showing people a better way. Most are ignored and forgotten without even being considered by society as a whole.

I used to have similar plans as you. I even thought of a way to make it profitable (not its primary purpose, that is I wasn't thinking of starting a business) as I knew that would be the only way it could have a chance at becoming mainstream. And as I looked into it I found there had already been at least two very similar to what I had in mind and not even I who was interested had heard of it before.

Speaking of which, you might find something similar to what you have in mind here, and you may want to register your intentional community with them later:
http://www.ic.org/

They don't include all intentional communities, of course, only those that register with them and still exist. They also include all sorts of advice and tips gained from experience on how best to run yours. Intentional communities does include a single house, btw. (At least it did when I kept up with this site and services years ago.)

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2014

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a