posted April 15, 2015 10:36 AM            

Further, just like the Marxist Messiah O'Bomber, Hillary has scads of fake Twitter followers!

Now, if Hillary can just get all those foreign nationals in Iraq and all those fake Twitter followers to vote for her...she might have a chance to get elected Prez!

Hillary has millions of 'fake' Twitter followers
Already under fire for 'buying' Facebook fans
Published: 21 hours ago

Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton has come under watchful social-media eyes, with reports indicating a good portion of her Facebook fans hail from Baghdad and a large percentage of her Twitter followers are phony.

The Daily Mail reported of Clinton’s touted 3.6 million Twitter followers, fully 15 percent, or 544,000, are fake.

That finding comes from StatusPeople.com, one of the world’s oldest and most respected Twitter auditing tools, which determined: 44 percent of Clinton’s followers are “good,” 15 percent are “fake,” and 41 percent are “inactive.”

Talk-radio giant Rush Limbaugh took notice of Clinton’s bogus followers on Twitter.

“Twitter is this society’s gutter. It is this society’s sewer where the trolls and the dregs and the human debris of our culture go and lurk in anonymity,” Limbaugh said on his top-rated program Tuesday. “A good percentage of them are political activists on the left who don’t have the guts to show up in public and put their real names to anything. And now they’re working for Hillary.”

Limbaugh also noted the report came from a British newspaper, the Daily Mail, complaining, “None of this is in the American media. They will bury it. They won’t cover it. They’ll ignore it.”

And the Twitter issue is not Clinton’s only social-media headache.

Joe Miller’s blog, Restoring Liberty, reported “at least 7 percent of Clinton’s Facebook fans list their hometown as Baghdad, way more than any other city in the world, including in the United States.”

Vocativ performed the analysis of her page, showcasing how Clinton might press the image of a politician of all-people, and in particular, a friend of the liberal elite, the numbers show differently. In fact, she’s more favored in Texas than in liberal enclaves in California and Massachusetts, at lease in terms of Facebook love.

“Iraqis and southerners are more likely to be a Facebook fan of Hillary than people living on America’s coasts,” Vocativ found. “And the Democratic candidate for president has one of her largest followings in the great red state of Texas.”

Vocativ also reported roughly 4 percent of Clinton’s Facebook fans hail from Chicago and New York City – but “Texas’ four major centers” of Houston, Dallas, Austin and San Antonio “contain more of her Facebook supporters” when taken together.

Only 8 percent of females and 11 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 34 – the age range generally regarded as the most tech-savvy – follow Clinton of Facebook. Most are older, age 55 or higher, Vocativ found.

The exception is in Baghdad.

“[There], Clinton enjoys the support of younger Facebook fans with 66 percent of her Iraqi female fans and 67 percent of males aged between 18 and 34,” the site found.

The social media aspect of Clinton’s presidential campaign is crucial.

posted April 18, 2015 11:59 AM            

In 2008 you were adamant that she should have been the candidate but it was stolen from her by the Machine. Now she is illegitimate due to lack of experience..after 8 more years of experience...the contortionist mind is wondrous to behold.

ONLY 3million followers...even before she announced lol. But keep at it and you will win her those votes too

posted April 19, 2015 08:20 AM            

Using ones official office to further financial gain is the very definition of corruption.

Let's not forget this is the utterly corrupt couple who sold sleep-overs in the Lincoln bedroom of the White House for campaign contributions.

Of course, usual suspects, Accidental Americans and leftist Kool-Aid drinkers don't give a rat's ass about corruption of any variety. They'd do the same damned things...if only they had the chance.

April 19, 2015
Two Scandals in One: Newsweek Uncovers Clinton Foundation's Biggest Donor Likely Violating Iran Sanctions
Thomas Lifson

Newsweek writer Rory Ross has done a valuable service bringing to light the activities of the largest single donor to the Clinton Foundation, a man most Americans have never heard of:

Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk, 54, has courted the Clintons for at least nine years – in the United States, the Alps and Ukraine.

Earlier this year, he was confirmed as the largest individual contributor to the Clinton Foundation, whose aims include the creation of “economic opportunity and growth”.

Pinchuk has been pursuing his own economic opportunities in Iran, a country the subject of sanctions.

Newsweek has seen declarations and documents from Ukraine that show a series of shipments from Interpipe to Iran in 2011 and 2012, including railway parts and products commonly used in the oil and gas sectors.

Among a number of high-value invoices for products related to rail or oil and gas, one shipment for $1.8m (1.7m) in May 2012 was for “seamless hot-worked steel pipes for pipelines” and destined for a city near the Caspian Sea.

Both the rail and oil and gas sectors are sanctioned by the US, which specifically prohibits any single invoice to the Iranian petrochemical industry worth more than $1m.

However, US sanctions laws are complex and, in certain areas, ill-defined. Interpipe may qualify for penalties due to the mere presence on American soil of North American Interpipe Inc, its United States subsidiary. (snip)

The person in charge of this list of non-US companies is the Secretary of State, who between 2009 to 2013 – the period during which Pinchuk’s company was trading with Iran – was Hillary Clinton.

This looks awfully bad for Hillary Clinton. The State Department has taken no public action against Pinchuk or his company, while Hillary’s foundation (that currently employs her daughter and has employed a number of her political operatives) took in millions from him. Ed Morrissey of Hot Air:

Even as far back as 2008, prior to Hillary Clinton becoming SecState, Pinchuk was one of the larger donors to the foundation — between $1 million and $5 million, according to the disclosure. While serving in that role for four years, Pinchuk coughed up at least $8.6 million, but that was just a down payment for what was planned to be a much bigger donation for the Clinton Global Initiative, supposedly a separate operation during her tenure at State:

Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.

Mr. Pinchuk and his wife—the daughter of former Ukraine President Leonid Kuchma—began donating to Clinton charities in 2006 after being introduced to Mr. Clinton by Doug Schoen, a pollster who has worked for both Clintons.

In 2008, Mr. Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, a wing of the foundation that coordinates charitable projects and funding for them but doesn’t handle the money. The pledge was to fund a program to train future Ukrainian leaders and professionals “to modernize Ukraine,” according to the Clinton Foundation. Several alumni are current members of the Ukrainian Parliament. Actual donations so far amount to only $1.8 million, a Pinchuk foundation spokesman said, citing the impact of the 2008 financial crisis.

So kudos to Newsweek reporter Ross. But wait! How did the editors in New York choose to lead off this story of a Hillary Clinton scandal?

Enemies of Hillary Clinton waiting to discredit her bid for the White House are likely to seize on news that one of the biggest benefactors to the Clinton Foundation has been trading with Iran and may be in breach of US sanctions imposed on the country.

The “enemies” (not opponents, but enemies) are the story, not Hillary. Mark Hemingway of The Weekly Standard:

Why on earth would a story about Clinton cashing large checks from a shady Ukranian oligarch be framed not about the scandal itself, but whether or not Hillary Clinton's supposed "enemies" would use it to discredit her? If she has, in fact, done something wrong or inappropriate -- she deserves to be discredited and/or judged by voters.

Newsweek’s framing of the story is the second scandal. Only a hopeless partisan would frame a story of wrongdoing with the question of whether her “enemies” will use it against her.

posted April 20, 2015 01:53 PM            

Yes, Hillary had the nomination stolen from her in 2008 by the demoscat National Committee and leftist Establishment. Sure, I didn't like it...or any other theft for that matter.

But, you're absolutely wrong that Hillary has more experience now than then...unless you're counting flying on luxury government owned jets, staying at luxury hotels and dining out at 5 star restaurants...ALL ON THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER'S DIME. Unless you're counting losing Libya, losing Egypt, losing Iraq and utterly failing to properly assess Syria's Assad...as valuable experience; Hillary called Assad "A REFORMER". Right Check! Assad's been reforming live Syrian citizens into dead Syrians.

Or, perhaps you meant the experience Hillary gained by trading on her position as Sec State to enrich herself and her corrupt husband with donations to their family business by foreigners who had business with the United States...known as "SELLING INFLUENCE".

Or, perhaps you're talking about Hillary's added experience in lying...about the Bengazi
terrorist attack, it's cause, the email trail from the Libyan Ambassador and her lies about her private email account being used for official government business and emails Hillary deleted from her account which were the subject of congressional investigations.