Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  A Rational Conversation Against Climate Change

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   A Rational Conversation Against Climate Change
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 68293
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 08, 2016 01:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I recently sat next to a woman on a flight from Houston which began with pleasantries regarding the purposes of our trip. When asked whether mine was for business or pleasure, I said that it combined a bit of both. I explained that I was on my way to do a media interview.

That led her to ask what it was that I do, to which I answered that I’m in the habit of writing quite a lot about topics that vary considerably, but frequently address stuff about climate and energy . . . often many politically incorrect aspects.

She asked, “You aren’t like that guy in Ohio that doesn’t believe in climate change, are you?”

I responded that I don’t personally know anyone who doesn’t think that climate changes, but there may be one in Ohio that I have yet to meet. Seems to me that climate change has been going on for quite a while . . . billions of years in fact.

Global temperatures were at least just as warm about 2,000 years ago during the “Roman Warm Period” when popular fashions featured cool-looking sandals and togas. Conditions were much the same again during the “Medieval warm period” about a thousand years later. That was when Eric the Red and his Norse pals, sans-sandals, raised sheep and goats on southwestern Greenland’s coastal grasslands.

Around 1350, Red’s Viking descendants pulled up stakes and high-tailed it out of there for friendlier climes with the coming of a “little ice age.” That big chill lasted until shortly after Washington’s troops spent a brutally cold winter at Valley Forge in 1777, and Napoleon’s beat a brutally frigid retreat from Moscow in 1812.

Incidentally, the warming that followed began before the Industrial Revolution brought CO2-belching smokestacks and SUVs, and has continued in fits and starts ever since.

Still, U.S. temperatures between 1910 through the mid-1940s were warmer than now, and then cooled again for about three decades. By the late 1970s many “climate experts” heralded the arrival of the next real ice age. That alarm vector reversed entirely about a decade later when Sen. Al Gore’s steamy 1988 Senate hearings concluded that the planet is on fire and we are causing it.

She: “We must be. How can anyone deny the influence of the record levels of CO2 we are polluting the atmosphere with?”

Me: Satellite temperature records which have been available only since 1979 show that other than naturally-occurring 1998 and 2015 El Nino temperature spikes, no statistically significant global warming has occurred for nearly two decades. On the other hand, satellite imagery shows that the plant-fertilizing CO2 “pollution” you referred to has increased global greening by 25 to 50 percent since then . . . lots more veggies for all God’s creatures.

She: “Then why are glaciers melting faster than ever, and causing oceans to rise and coastlines to flood?”

Me: Yes, the Arctic, which goes through regular 60-70 year-long warming and cooling cycles, has most recently been losing some ice mass, while most of the vastly larger Antarctic continent has been gaining.

A National Academy of Sciences report attributes a primary cause of those thunderous West Antarctic Ice Sheet iceberg collapses we often see featured in the media to geothermal heat from seabed volcanoes below.

This coastal melting has been operating at time scales of hundreds to thousands of years.

There’s also no reason for feverishly overheated concern regarding glacial melting causing a rapid sea level rise. It’s another natural phenomenon that has been occurring over eons.

The rate of that increase has stabilized over the past few hundred years at about seven inches per century.

She: “Why then are increasingly frequent and severe weather events occurring which scientists predict will become even worse? How can you possibly claim that we aren’t causing all of this to happen?”

Me: If we are, might we then also take some credit for good news too?

No category 3-5 hurricanes have struck the U.S. coast since October 2005, a record century-long lull since 1900. And according to both NOAA and U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there has been no increase in the severity or frequency of floods, droughts, thunderstorms or tornadoes in recent decades either.

She: “Well what about all of the real climate scientists who say otherwise? Al Gore got the Nobel Peace Prize for telling us differently. Do you think you are smarter?”

I admitted to real professional limitations on that last point. Being more a rocket scientist than true climate scientist like him, I falsely assumed he got the award for inventing the Internet, along with an Oscar for his sensationally dramatic science fiction horror movie acting performance.

That abruptly ended our chat. My seatmate promptly returned to reading a Rolling Stone magazine Bernie Sanders feature. The rest of that flight was very quiet. I even got some sleep.

Larry Bell is an endowed professor of space architecture at the University of Houston where he founded the Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) and the graduate program in space architecture. He is the author of “Scared Witless: Prophets and Profits of Climate Doom”(2015) and “Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind the Global Warming Hoax” (2012).
http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/energy-gore/2016/08/08/id/742569/

IP: Logged

Novabronte
Knowflake

Posts: 163
From: EU
Registered: Nov 2015

posted August 10, 2016 10:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Novabronte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oh my ha ha, I needed that at 4am lol

Incidentally , don't know if you have seen the seismic data for Yellowstone, and around the world for that matter…
Yellowstone is showing some unusual activity, roads around the park are melting ...
The earthquakes around NZ are circa 5 in richter scale and deep. Lots of activity in Europe, around Greece especially and above 4 in richter scale.
If you look at stats we have about 600 earthquakes per week around the world, over 2000 p/m, 45K last year.. thats unbelievable !
The west coast Cascadia subduction zone is very active, and recently there was a disaster training exercise conducted there with all the military engaged … if you look at Cascadia disaster simulations the major eruption there will cause catastrophic tsunami to flood half of US, trample over Japan and flood all coastal cities in Australia.
Ice melting seems like a smokescreen topic for more serious issues.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 68293
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 10, 2016 11:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yep, and Yellowstone is a supervolcano, so if it blows, it will be catastrophic. But they are more concerned with air conditioning being more dangerous than ISIS.

IP: Logged

Belage
Knowflake

Posts: 2338
From: USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2016 12:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Belage     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Newsmax...uh? I have a hard time taking anything from this site seriously. I find their extreme right wingism off putting.

Anyhoo, here is what climate scientists have to say about climate change denier Larry Bell if anyone wants to take the time to read: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/01/forbes-rich-list-of-nonsense/

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 8533
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2016 07:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Apparently, there's still some people who never got the word that the man made hysteria over Man Made Global Warming has nothing whatsoever to do with climate, nothing to do with Algore's nonsense about man turning earth into a cinder.

The UN/IPCC..Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admitted...years ago that so called "climate change" and the hysteria associated with it has nothing to do with curbing earth's temperature. It's all about "redistribution of wealth", not climate.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 68293
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 11, 2016 08:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Anyone rational can understand the article. It's not rocket science.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2016

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a