posted November 14, 2016 08:51 AM            

You can be double damned sure you'd never see or hear me supporting the utter stupidity of those who have the intellectual capacity of retarded sand fleas as they go about venting their juvenile, infantile rage against our Constitutional Republican form of government.

“Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

"Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democratic primary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as a psychological disorder."

“When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

Now, go have yourselves a good little cry. You've been told NO...for perhaps the first time in your lives and we're going to make it stick. Lay in a good supply of Kleenex. You're going to be hearing NO repeatedly over the next 8 years as the adults in America try to turn whining little crybabies into responsible adults.

posted November 14, 2016 11:57 AM            

This election has brought forth the worst in America. It will be painful to observe the downward slide into McCarthyism, repression, inequality and misogyny.

posted November 14, 2016 12:10 PM            

I'm sure glad you're not in America. We have enough lame brained moron leftists we're trying hard to get rid of.

As a practical matter, don't you leftist stooges have enough problems in Europe to keep you busy? Perhaps you should clean up your own act...failing economy, nations dropping out of the EU..or wanting to, invasion by Islamic terrorists who murder, rape, sexually assault women and young girls and blow buildings and people up. Why don't you concentrate on your own problems before you reach out to extend the scope of your stupidity?

posted November 14, 2016 12:20 PM            

'Tolerant' educators exile Trump voters from campus: Glenn Reynolds
November 14, 2016

With puppies, Play-doh and coloring books, safe spaces and therapy sessions turn universities into a joke.

One of the more amusing bits of fallout from last week’s election has been the safe-space response of many colleges and universities to the election of the “wrong” candidate. But on closer examination, this response isn’t really amusing. In fact, it’s downright mean.

Trump’s substantial victory, when most progressives expected a Hillary landslide, came as a shock to many. That shock seems to have been multiplied in academe, where few people seem to know any Trump supporters — or, at least, any Trump supporters who’ll admit to it.

The response to the shock has been to turn campuses into kindergarten. The University of Michigan Law School announced a ”post-election self-care” event with “food and play,” including “coloring sheets, play dough [sic], positive card-making, Legos and bubbles with your fellow law students.” (Embarrassed by the attention, UM Law scrubbed the announcement from its website, perhaps concerned that people would wonder if its graduates would require Legos and bubbles in the event of stressful litigation.)

Stanford emailed its students and faculty that psychological counseling was available for those experiencing “uncertainty, anger, anxiety and/or fear” following the election. So did the University of Michigan’s Flint campus.

Meanwhile, even the Ivy League wasn’t immune, with Penn (Trump’s alma mater) creating a post-election safe space with puppies and coloring books:

Student Daniel Tancredi reported that the people who attended were “fearful” about the results of the election.

“For the most part, students just hung out and ate snacks and made small talk,” Tancredi told The College Fix. “Of course, that was in addition to coloring and playing with the animals.”

As the event took place, students — roughly 20 or so, according to the Sun’s video — wrote their reactions and emotions on poster boards with colored markers, or with chalk on the ground. A chilly day on the Ithaca campus, at one point the demonstrators huddled together as what appeared to be a barista brought them warm drinks. Several adults, most likely professors, stood around the group. The event appeared to take on the atmosphere of a funeral wake.

Yale had a ”group scream.”

At Tufts, the university offered arts and crafts, while the University of Kansas reminded students that there were plenty of “therapy dogs” available. At other schools, exams were cancelled and professors expressed their sympathy to traumatized students.

It’s easy to mock this as juvenile silliness — because, well, it is juvenile silliness of the sort documented in Frank Furedi’s What Happened To The University? But that’s not all it is. It’s also exactly what these schools purport to abhor: An effort to marginalize and silence part of the university community.

In an email to students, the University of Michigan’s President, Mark Schlissel, wrote: “Our responsibility is to remain committed to education, discovery and intellectual honesty — and to diversity, equity and inclusion. We are at our best when we come together to engage respectfully across our ideological differences; to support ALL who feel marginalized, threatened or unwelcome; and to pursue knowledge and understanding.”

But when you treat an election in which the “wrong” candidate wins as a traumatic event on a par with the 9/11 attacks, calling for counseling and safe spaces, you’re implicitly saying that everyone who supported that “wrong” candidate is, well, unsafe. Despite the talk about diversity and inclusion, this is really sending the signal that people who supported Trump — and Trump carried the state of Michigan, so there are probably quite a few on campus — aren’t really included in acceptable campus culture. It’s not promoting diversity, it’s enforcing uniformity. It’s not promoting inclusion, it’s practicing exclusion. And, though it pretends to be about nurturing, it’s actually about being mean to those who don’t fall in the nurtured class. Schlissel says he wants the University of Michigan to be “a welcoming place for all members of society,” but how welcome can students who backed Trump feel in the wake of this performance?

A viral (and profane) YouTube rant by Jonathan Pie points out that this sort of fear and “othering” of political opponents is why Trump won, and why Democrats were shocked by his victory. Pie’s right to tell people that they should engage in discussion rather than dismissal of people they disagree with, and colleges and universities should listen to him.

posted November 14, 2016 12:26 PM            

***edit***

posted November 14, 2016 01:11 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
If you're looking for "safe places" where discouraging words against your ideological beliefs are never heard or where coloring books, Play-Doh, puppy dogs, safety pins, building blocks and child psychological counselling sessions are provided, perhaps you should look elsewhere.

***edit***

One more thing.
Don't start arguments you can't finish...like this one.

---

or what ? seriously, or what ?

posted November 14, 2016 01:41 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
That's pretty big talk from someone hiding behind their computer screen pire. Luckily, for you, we're probably never going to meet..face to face.

What I said to astro about tending to and mending problems in your own country before trying to spread your stupidity abroad, applies to you too.

---

hahaha, the U.S. influences the complete world- and i didnt know that the U.S. and Europe exist on 2 different planets.

posted November 14, 2016 02:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
That's pretty big talk from someone hiding behind their computer screen pire. Luckily, for you, we're probably never going to meet..face to face.

What I said to astro about tending to and mending problems in your own country before trying to spread your stupidity abroad, applies to you too.

---

HAHA, my 6ft3 and 15 stone can wait to have a calm discussion with you, face to face

posted November 14, 2016 02:18 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, [b]an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.” “Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to “the vast right-wing conspiracy.”

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democratic primary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

“A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do,” he says. “A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do.”

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

•creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
•satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
•augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
•rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

“The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says. “When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

***Leftists are living up to all of Dr. Rossiter's expectations, mine too!*** [/B]

---

Jwhop, multipartyism clearly traumatizes your brain, I hope you really consider my suggestion to go to North Korea, one party and one man to worship for the rest of your life.

I hope you enjoy tree bark soup.

------------------
I seem to have loved you in numberless forms...

posted November 14, 2016 02:20 PM            

------------------
I seem to have loved you in numberless forms...

posted November 14, 2016 02:23 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LeeLoo2014:

Jwhop, multipartyism clearly traumatizes your brain, I hope you really consider my suggestion to go to North Korea, one party and one man to worship for the rest of your life.

I hope you enjoy tree bark soup.

---