|
Author
|
Topic: Mueller Colluded With Russia!
|
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 83224
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 03, 2017 09:40 PM
  
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/26617-mueller-s-role-in-delivering-uranium-to-russians-raises-questions IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 4657
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted August 03, 2017 10:13 PM
As an employee of the US govt. No collusion involved. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 4657
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted August 03, 2017 10:33 PM
The context of theUS trading in uranium with Russia is not suspicious. The leaving it out is right in line with DTs wish to discredit Mueller. And all of a Sudden leaks are great news🎺🎺🎺📯🎻🎻🎻right? Pot .. kettle.
IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10439
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 03, 2017 11:01 PM
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/003408.html IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 83224
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 03, 2017 11:29 PM
I didn't say Mueller's collusion was a crime. Hillary and Bill receiving personal benefits from the uranium sale to Russia is the crime.IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 4657
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted August 04, 2017 12:10 AM
But not a crime when Saudis give bigly to Ivankas fave charity right after being given a big discount on US arms deal. Please describe the difference? And explain how paying Clinton to speak in Russia is a crime while you're at it? You like to think your man is different bevause he's a mouthy so and so.. clothes do not make the man. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 83224
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 04, 2017 09:19 PM
There was nothing discounted about that arms deal.IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 10129
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 04, 2017 09:59 PM
"And explain how paying Clinton to speak in Russia is a crime while you're at it?"It's clear some people don't understand the concept of selling one's government office for personal profit or just don't give a damn. Getting paid for a speech in Russia is not a crime. Getting paid for a speech in Russia...BEFORE OR AFTER YOUR WIFE GAVE THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT 20% OF THE US URANIUM SUPPLY IS A PAYOFF. SO WAS THE $100+ MILLION DONATED TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION BY RUSSIAN INDIVIDUALS TIED TO THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT A PAYOFF FOR HILLARY THE CORRUPT GRANTING THE URANIUM SALE TO PUTIN'S RUSSIA. Plain and simple, Hillary The Corrupt sold her office of Sec State and THAT IS A CRIME. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 4657
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted August 05, 2017 12:10 AM
nobody GAVE them any uranium lmao. It was a govt business deal and she didn't do it alone. She is a tool plain and simple. "You might not be so in the dark if you stopped watching the fake news" IP: Logged |
jwhop
Knowflake Posts: 10129
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 05, 2017 08:39 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Catalina:
nobody GAVE them any uranium lmao. It was a govt business deal and she didn't do it alone. She is a tool plain and simple. "You might not be so in the dark if you stopped watching the fake news"
The US Government did NOT own that uranium processing and production plant. As usual, you're full of it. Further, the Clintons have a long history of selling out America to fatten their campaign and personal bank accounts. This is the same utterly corrupt duo who sold Communist China ballistic missile guidance technology. This is the same utterly corrupt duo who put a Communist Chinese agent in as the number 2 at the Commerce Dept, gave this Chinese agent a top secret clearance and moved Export Control from the State Dept to Commerce so high technology, including weapons technology could be sold to Communist China. Pull your head out. You're arguing against historical facts. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 4657
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted August 05, 2017 12:48 PM
Most of the text of the leak Assange's tweet was based on was not included in his tweet ..tweets lend themselves to short statements but the leak was posted online. No it didn't belong to US but was removed from Georgia in 2006, who authorized the delivery in 09.However it was posted online here is some of it paraphrased right from Randalls post. I saw and mentioned it a couple of days ago...
Over two years ago Russia requested a ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia [the Russian territory, not the American state] during a nuclear smuggling sting operation … In response to the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the United States to share a sample of the material with the Russians for forensic analysis.”
So please stop pretending Clinton swiped it too give to Russia. The original deal happened under GW and all channels were clear for the transfer. Your obsession with the Clintons is not healthy. But maybe you should go work for the WH too Im sure you'd fit in perfectly. IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
