Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Did Hillary 's State Dept transfer 20% of U.S. Uranium?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Did Hillary 's State Dept transfer 20% of U.S. Uranium?
Node
Knowflake

Posts: 3083
From: 2,015 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 26, 2017 07:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It has come up in nearly every thread.

~also~

Did nine investors funnel money to the tune of 145M into the Clinton Foundation?

Discuss

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 87811
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 26, 2017 10:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Lucy, you got some 'splainin' to do!

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 3083
From: 2,015 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 26, 2017 10:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Are you waiting for JW to take the lead on this?

Nothing to say?

Or~ maybe you just want to Hillary bomb every thread other than this one.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 87811
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 26, 2017 03:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
CNN only spent 5 minutes in a whole day on it, so I can't blame you for being so in the dark. Perhaps, you should Google or watch real news.

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 5318
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted October 26, 2017 06:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is this forum a discussion room ..or just a scorecard?

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 5318
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted October 31, 2017 02:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No There there tho is there? 😉💩
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2017/10/29/1710809/-Joy-Reid-dismantles-GOP-Uranium-One-propaganda-in-a-little-under-two-minutes?

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 3083
From: 2,015 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 31, 2017 02:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
wouldn't play for me cat, but this one did:
http://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/uranium-one-joy-reid-debunks-fake-news-targeting-clinton-1084014147813

------------------
I want to see Drumpf's tax returns! & Deutsche Bank loans.

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 3083
From: 2,015 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted October 31, 2017 03:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
They [conservative outlets] are very good at shifting the narrative, as she points out.

IP: Logged

pire
Knowflake

Posts: 2667
From: France
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 01, 2017 05:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pire     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
*****

PBS Newshour if you want to / can watch the video, otherwise, below is the transcript of the report :

*****

President Trump and the conservative media are trying to shift the focus of the Russia probe toward two stories regarding Hillary Clinton and the funding behind the so-called ďRussian dossierĒ and a 2010 Uranium deal with a Russian corporation. William Brangham puts the stories in context and looks at the truth behind the allegations.

Read the Full Transcript

Judy Woodruff:

As the Russia probe continues, President Trump and conservative media outlets are promoting two stories about Hillary Clinton that they say should be the real focus of an investigation.

But whatís the truth behind those allegations?

Our William Brangham is here to put them in context.

President Donald Trump:

And you look at whatís happened with Russia and you look at the uranium deal and you look at the fake dossier.

Sean Hannity:

With Uranium One, the FBI had mountains of evidence of Russian bribery.

Judge Jeanine:

The Clinton campaign and the DNC paid $12 million for a dossier to connect Donald Trump to Russia.

William Brangham:

The president and much of the conservative media are arguing that these two stories about the infamous Russian dossier and the so-called Uranium One deal are evidence that not only is the Russia story a hoax, but that Hillary Clinton should be investigated, not President Trump.

First, the dossier.

The so-called Russian dossier was compiled by this man, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. He got his information from various Russian contacts, some of whom he paid for their info. Steele was working at the time for a company called Fusion GPS.

In January, BuzzFeed News released a copy of the dossier. It contained as yet unproven allegations that the Russians had wanted Mr. Trump to win the election, that Russians had shared valuable information about Hillary Clinton with the Trump campaign, and that Russia had compromising sexually explicit video of Mr. Trump that could be used as blackmail.

The conservative news site The Free Beacon initially paid Fusion GPS to gather material against Mr. Trump. It was gathered for Marco Rubioís presidential campaign because The Beaconís largest funder was a big Rubio supporter.

That funding stopped when Mr. Trump clinched the Republican presidential nomination. After that point, Marc Elias, Elias, a top lawyer for the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign, continued paying Fusion GPS, and thatís when the Steele dossier was compiled.

Itís these payments that the White House says proves the Clinton campaign was behind the whole Russia story. They seem to be arguing that, because Christopher Steele got his information from Russian sources, that means the Clinton campaign was colluding with the Russians and creating this false narrative.

Hereís how White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders put it today:

Sarah Sanders:

Thereís clear evidence of the Clinton campaign colluding with Russian intelligence to spread disinformation and smear the President to influence the election.

William Brangham:

The White Houseís theory ignores the broad consensus shared by U.S. intelligence agencies that the Russians did try and influence our elections, in part by hacking e-mails from the DNC and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.

The second story is about the so-called Uranium One deal, which President Trump has called this eraís Watergate.

It dates back to 2010 and the sale of a controlling interest in a company called Uranium One. Itís a Canadian mining company that partly operates in the United States, and it was sold to a state-owned Russian corporation, Rosatom.

The sale involved control of about 20 percent of the United Statesí uranium reserves, and the sale required a review by the U.S. government. The claim is that Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time, approved the sale in exchange for $145 million in contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative.

President Donald Trump:

Hillary Clinton gave them 20 percent of our uranium, gave Russia, for a big payment.

William Brangham:

So, letís break this down.

First, Secretary Clinton didnít have the authority to approve the deal. Several different U.S. agencies had to sign off on the deal, all of which did. There is no evidence that Clinton was informed or involved in the sale at all.

Second, the uranium never left the country. Itís not legal to export uranium produced in U.S. mines.

The Clinton Foundation did receive $145 million in contributions from individuals connected to Uranium One, beginning at least a year before the sale. And, in 2010, the year of the sale, former President Bill Clinton received $500,000 from a Russian bank for a speech he gave in Moscow.

For now, those all have been deemed legal transactions.

But, still, today, Mr. Trump once again stoked these stories on Twitter, suggesting now that even the Obama campaign might have been in on creating the dossier.

And on Capitol Hill, congressional Republicans continue their calls to investigate the Clinton campaign.

For the PBS NewsHour, Iím William Brangham.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 10741
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 01, 2017 02:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"The White Houseís theory ignores the broad consensus shared by U.S. intelligence agencies that the Russians did try and influence our elections, in part by hacking e-mails from the DNC and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta."

Bullshiite.

James Clapper and John Brennen were in the tank for Hillary The Corrupt. That phony Trump Dossier was used to get warrants to wiretap Trump campaign personnel and also used to unmask Americans when their names came up in wiretapped conversations between Russians.

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 3083
From: 2,015 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 01, 2017 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
James Clapper and John Brennen

nee Brennan

fake news


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u sa-security-intelligence/ex-cia-head-says-trump-remarks-on-russia-interference-disgraceful-idUSKBN1A7025

------------------
I want to see Drumpf's tax returns! & Deutsche Bank loans.

IP: Logged

iQ
Moderator

Posts: 5264
From: Lyra
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 02, 2017 10:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Some points sent by an American Researcher on this subject:

1. The sale of Canadian company, Uranium One which had mining licenses for about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity, was approved by all nine members of CIFUS, the board that approves or nixes foreign investment in the USA. CIFUS, further more, stated that if the same sale was proposed today, they would still approve the sale.

2. Clinton was NOT on that board at any time.

3. One member of the board who had previously owned shares in Uranium One but had long since sold the shares (2007), gave a large contribution to the Clinton Foundation long after his shares were sold.

4. Hillary Clinton WAS NOT the Secretary of state when the contribution was made to the Clinton Foundation.

5. There was absolutely nothing questionable, untoward or illegal about the sale, nor the contribution to the foundation.

6. The deal was also approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Ultimately, only the president could have blocked or suspended the arrangement.

7. No matter who owned Uranium One, uranium CANNOT be removed from the USA except to Canada for processing; and then it is RETURNED for energy use in the USA. Those USA mines involved in the 20% mining licenses are yellow cake uranium which is only good for energy production. None of it is weapons grade uranium

=========================================

If all the above points are true, why the brouhaha and noise about Hillary, who is not the President at the moment?
The Buck stops with the President of USA.
If Hillary is guilty despite the above 7 points, why aren't Trump and Jeff Sessions prosecuting Hillary? They promised to "Lock her Up" etc. Why not proceed to do it? Is Trump paralyzed by Fear about what Bill Clinton can do to him?

------------------
Astrology Articles

New Services and short readings

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 10741
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 02, 2017 02:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hillary The Corrupt's designee was on that committee.

Further, every single member of that committee was an Obama appointee.

Further, most of those members were also involved with Hillary The Corrupt's Clinton Foundation.

Further, the $145 million dollars "donated" to the Clinton Foundation came from people with a vested interest in Uranium One!

Bribery and taking bribes are federal felonies.

Lock them UP.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 87811
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 13, 2017 11:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sessions is finally looking into appointing a special counsel.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2017

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a