posted November 20, 2018 08:49 PM            

The "homogeneity" of the population was considered important by those in the ruling classes of the times. Hence the immigration laws Asian Exclusion, Chinese Exclusion, Immigration Act of 1924.

posted November 20, 2018 11:58 PM            

No, you're stating your opinion, not fact.

The fact is, the KKK had the right to march and government, city, state and federal had no authority to prevent them from marching.

Your opinion is that people supported their marches and they were therefore "acceptable" to the people.

The fact the KKK soon was forced "underground" belies your opinion that they were "acceptable".

posted November 21, 2018 11:23 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Catalina:
Why were there"nothing but whites"? Not because there was no political setup..

---

My own NE state has never passed a "political setup" law.

quote:

---

The Chinese Exclusion Act which assured that no chinese would legally enter the country. When you consider who built our railroads around the same time one had to wonder how did they get here?

Asians are also denied citizenship even when their contributions were incapable ri creating fortunes for.. white men.

Immigration laws excluding non Europeans from entry for 100 years.

Jim Crow laws and the legality of slavery were not "pocket southern" affairs.

The fully dressed KKK marches in DC showed the acceptance of such groups.. in the 20s, before they had to go underground.

These are all white identity politics as are your statements about the hatred of POC for poor whitey.

Trump is very careful to not use the words non-white... but it's identity politics to lump Hispanics, mE folk and Haitians, for instance, altogether as undesirable, criminal, etc.

---

This isn't identity politics, it's simply white awareness. A nation founded by Whites, for Whites, established laws to maintain White demographics and hence White culture. That's basic enough, isn't it? Mexico today has similar immigration laws protecting its demographics. Yet, find me a explicitly pro Latino Mexican political party or activist coalition lobbying for the advancement of Latinos. You can't because there is no need for one. Mexico is a Latino nation. This is known and accepted. Is the US a White nation?

Incidentally Jews were already defined as White under the 1790 Naturalization Law - and back then the Jews were happy to considered so!

So my question remains, every identity under the sun has now formed a viable, accepted, and quite powerful political/activist/lobbying group. Most of them are corporate/media approved and financed. (Yesterday I saw a Goldman Sachs ad celebrating National Trans Day) Every group but Whites. Why?

posted November 21, 2018 12:49 PM            

This is total assumption. I have never condoned or supported violence of any colour. And I have never heard the march organizers apologize or reprimand the violence in charlottesville the way BLM did after Dallas..

Sorry shura but you act as if white folk are the underdogs hence my sarcasm. As you yourself pointed out: There is no need to openly market for those who have claimed and set the parameters even tho there have always been "POC" here, in fact we took over from POC who were already well established here, slaughtering them as "savages"; we brought our own POC "chattel", and have benefited from the labour of people of all colours. Part of the majority "white" population are actually what are filed under White-hispanic.

The fact that "POC" remained largely hidden in the past doesn't mean they weren't here. It is the very absence of white identity politics that assumes no one else really matters. But tho desctete, white politicians made sure that segregation and denial of citizenship kept "those people" out of sight and out of your neighborhood..

It is ridiculous to claim that all POC hate white people. It proves the point that they have been relegated to a different part of society in the past where it was possible to tell oneself they weren't even there!

posted November 21, 2018 03:02 PM            

That's ugly, cat. Even for you, that's ugly.