Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Let's See, What Crime Should We Accuse President Trump Of Committing?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Let's See, What Crime Should We Accuse President Trump Of Committing?
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 13796
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 17, 2019 12:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Randall for bringing this up on another thread!
"The Dems are calling it bribery, because they did a focus group asking which sounds worse, quid pro quo or bribery."

Democrats Are Literally Focus Grouping What Crime To Accuse Trump Of
Ben Marquis
November 15, 2019

It has been asserted by some, perhaps jokingly, that House Democrats have long intended to file articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump and have simply been waiting to find a specific crime with which they can fill in the blanks of a pre-drafted resolution.

As it turns out, such assertions may not have actually been a joke after all, as it has now been revealed that the latest impeachment accusation buzzword that Democrats and the media have repeated ad nauseam in recent days — “bribery” — only came about as the result of focus-group testing conducted by a major Democratic organization in recent weeks.

That revelation was buried toward the end of a lengthy article by The Washington Post about the latest impeachment news published on Thursday.

With “bribery” mentioned in the headline and a note that the word was the “most aggressive language yet” from Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, The Post made it clear that this particular word would replace the Latin “quid pro quo” term that has been bandied about over the past two months.

The Post reported that the linguistic shift occurred “after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment.”

“Among the questions put to participants was whether ‘quid pro quo,’ ‘extortion’ or ‘bribery’ was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct.”

Two anonymous sources said to be “familiar” with the focus group results said that “bribery” had been chosen from the selection of terms because the focus group participants found it to be the “most damning” of them all.

The first Democrat to introduce the new buzzword was apparently Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee that is heading up the impeachment inquiry charade. In a Sunday appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Himes said that “it’s probably best not to use Latin words” to describe the alleged “abuse of power” perpetrated by President Trump, and suggested that “bribery” was a more fitting descriptive word.

“Abuse of power is not necessarily a concept that most Americans run around thinking about,” Himes told reporters on Thursday, according to The Post. “In this case, the abuse of power was some combination of bribery and extortion.”

That talking point was echoed by Pelosi on Thursday during her weekly news conference when she said that “quid pro quo” and “bribery” mean the same thing.

Pelosi told reporters that a term like bribery would be easier for the average American to understand.

“Talking Latin around here: E Pluribus Unum — from many, one. Quid pro quo — bribery. And that is in the Constitution, attached to the impeachment proceedings,” she said.

It is true that “bribery” is listed as one of the few impeachable offenses listed in Article II of the Constitution. But simply repeating a particular word over and over again — after carefully focus-group testing it — doesn’t prove that it happened.

Pelosi also used the term in reference to Wednesday’s testimony from diplomats Bill Taylor and George Kent — neither of whom had firsthand knowledge of the events they testified about.

“The devastating testimony corroborated evidence of bribery uncovered in the inquiry and that the president abused power and violated his oath by threatening to withhold military aid and a White House meeting in exchange for an investigation into his political rival,” she said.

Again, excessively repeating the favored new phrase in place of an outdated one doesn’t necessarily mean it is true, as Republican Rep. Brad Wenstrup of Ohio seemed to imply when he told The Post that “[Democrats are] trying a different narrative to see if that works.”

“‘Quid pro quo’ was squashed. If it wasn’t, they would still be saying it, right? And, so, now they’ll try a different term.”

Eventually, Democrats will phase out their new term and will seize upon some other imagined crime with a loaded phrase.

It is nothing short of ridiculous that Democrats would outsource impeachment by focus-group testing various criminal terms. It just goes to show how morally bankrupt and transparently partisan this whole “Schiff show” of an impeachment inquiry truly is.

http://www.westernjournal.com/democrats-literally-focus-grouping-crime-accuse-trump/

What's the next accusation leftist loons will make against Trump, JAYWALKING?

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 120303
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 18, 2019 10:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This.

IP: Logged

shura
Knowflake

Posts: 2066
From: kamaloka
Registered: Jun 2009

posted November 19, 2019 04:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shura     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is all so tiresome. I dont know just keep throwing shiiit .... porn stars, mobsters, Russians, whatever you can find laying around something will stick eventually I guess.

Honestly who cant see through this charade?

Are you not entertained? lol no I'm not I'm bored.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 13796
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 19, 2019 11:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

IP: Logged

iQ
Moderator

Posts: 5855
From: Lyra
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 20, 2019 01:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sondland in today's Testimony:
"Was there a Quid Pro Quo?" YES".

History might record today's Sondland testimony as equal to John Dean's testimony that ultimately led to Nixon's impeachment.

Ken Starr is disappointed with GOP.

Rudy is going to prison.

Mulvaney is going to prison.

Pompeo's career is f**ked, no more election wins for him in a long while.

Pence MIGHT resign.

Next, a whistle blower will reveal the corruption linked to Saudi Arabia.

President Nancy Pelosi will have a tough job steering USA out of the Mobster Mess of Putin's International Crime Syndicate....

IP: Logged

shura
Knowflake

Posts: 2066
From: kamaloka
Registered: Jun 2009

posted November 20, 2019 07:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shura     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
worst news cycle ever.

IP: Logged

BlueRoamer
Knowflake

Posts: 751
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 20, 2019 09:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueRoamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Remember when the White House was overtaken by the Russian Mafia and installed a puppet president?

Pepperidge farms remembers.

IP: Logged

shura
Knowflake

Posts: 2066
From: kamaloka
Registered: Jun 2009

posted November 21, 2019 09:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for shura     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Remember when the Israelis were caught with stingray spy devices outside the White House?

I 'memba

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 13118
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2019 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/21/fiona-hill-will-tell-devin-nunes-his-face-that-his-ukraine-conspiracy-theory-is-harmful/?fbclid=IwAR02-o-BtmFO4-ZVocFeXwRopA9Z6R6G dx6O8LCGfx64zvk5FWlbTt1FKPM

Fiona Hill, doing something rare in this administration: telling the truth.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 120303
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2019 05:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Meaningless. She was fired before any of it supposedly happened.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 13796
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2019 06:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Originally posted by iQ:
Sondland in today's Testimony:
"Was there a Quid Pro Quo?" YES".

Now, Sondland's actual testimony:

“I decided to ask the president the question in an open-ended fashion, because there were so many different scenarios floating around as to what was going on with Ukraine.

“So rather than ask the president nine different questions, is it this, is it this, is it that? I just said, what do you want from Ukraine? I may have even used a four-letter word.

“And he said, ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I just want Zelensky to do the right thing,’ words that he ran under, to that effect,” he said.

History might record today's Sondland testimony as equal to John Dean's testimony that ultimately led to Nixon's impeachment.

Sondland absolutely cleared Trump of any quid pro quo, extortion or bribery

Ken Starr is disappointed with GOP.

No one gives a rat's a$$ what the guy thinks who didn't throw Hillary The Corrupt in prison for obstructing his investigation by not producing her subpoenaed Rose Law Firm billing records.

Rudy is going to prison.

NOT

Mulvaney is going to prison.

NOT

Pompeo's career is f**ked, no more election wins for him in a long while.

Pompeo will some day be President of the United States

Pence MIGHT resign.

NOT

Next, a whistle blower will reveal the corruption linked to Saudi Arabia.

A whistle blower will someday reveal the President ignored the signs and walked on the White House lawn

President Nancy Pelosi will have a tough job steering USA out of the Mobster Mess of Putin's International Crime Syndicate....

If Nancy Pee-Lousy lives to the age of Methuselah, she will never be President of the United States

You are slipping further into psychosis.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 120303
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 16, 2019 10:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Obstruction of Congress is a nothing burger, since Congress didn't go to the courts to compel witnesses. Abuse of power has no elements, i.e., it's a fake crime. The Democrats think the American people are idiots.

IP: Logged

BlueRoamer
Knowflake

Posts: 751
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 16, 2019 11:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueRoamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ops

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 13796
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 17, 2019 11:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
Obstruction of Congress is a nothing burger, since Congress didn't go to the courts to compel witnesses. Abuse of power has no elements, i.e., it's a fake crime. The Democrats think the American people are idiots.


The democrat day of reckoning is closer than they think.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2019

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a