Author
|
Topic: Supreme Court reveals Circuit Court Assignments
|
Dhyana Knowflake Posts: 1116 From: US Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted November 20, 2020 06:52 PM
Here are the Justices assigned to key battleground states: PA - Samuel A. Alito MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh WI - Amy Coney Barrett GA - Clarence Thomas
Why do these circuit assignments matter? quote: The Supreme Court helpfully explains, at length, why the justices’ circuit assignments matter. Petitioners will submit emergency applications to an individual justice. A recent example? Pennsylvania Republicans (in the Third Circuit) submitted an emergency application with Justice Samuel Alito, asking for an injunction in an election-related case. Alito responded by granting the request himself 33 to the rest of the Supreme Court.
snip quote: [F]our of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay....“Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/supreme-court-unveils-new-circuit-assignments-justices-breakdown/ IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 134326 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 20, 2020 11:33 PM
This is going to be a nail-biter. IP: Logged |
Dhyana Knowflake Posts: 1116 From: US Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted November 21, 2020 12:35 AM
I'm encouraged that it only takes four Justices to grant a hearing. And, it just so happens that four conservative Justices are assigned to the most prominent contested states.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 134326 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 21, 2020 12:37 AM
The fix was in. Watch for the win. IP: Logged |
Dhyana Knowflake Posts: 1116 From: US Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted November 22, 2020 10:00 PM
A note to Scott Adams about Supreme Court judges assigned to federal circuits I'm skipping the parts relating to Scott Adams' speculations about the meaning of the Circuit Court assignments and quoting the "meat" of the article.
quote: As the election challenges continue, the television and media driven mantra that the sky will fall if Joe Biden is not elected president is fatuous and false, along with its sibling that the country will be "torn apart" if courts intervene to change the psychological operation underway that Biden is the "president-elect", although he has not yet been constitutionally elected or selected. And, that the "credibility of the system" will not remain intact if election contests are sustained by court or legislative action, and Trump remains president. Those phrases are commonly used to try to weaken resolve and cause others, especially those in decision-making positions, to not push forward, and to manipulate their sense of guilt that they will contribute to great damage and destruction unless they throw in the towel and submit to what perpetrators might desire.The cognitive psychology displayed since election day to impede and delegitimize investigations of the election is quite sophisticated. If Trump prevails, the probable street protests, violence, and media propaganda that will follow will not cause "the system" to fall apart, because the active perpetrators will be badly outnumbered by "us", and people with jobs in the system will want to continue on with their lives.
http://turcopolier.typepad.c om/sic_semper_tyrannis/2020/11/a-note-to-scott-adams-about-supreme-court-judges-assigned-to-federal-circuits.html#more IP: Logged |