Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Sidney Powell Asks SCOTUS To Decertify Election Results

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Sidney Powell Asks SCOTUS To Decertify Election Results
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 13, 2020 10:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://m.theepochtimes.com/powell-asks-supreme-court-to-immediately-order-states-to-decertify-election-results_3616170.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign =mb-2020-12-13

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 16776
From: http://forum.astro.com/cgi/forum.cgi?action=viewprofile;username=u36170365
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 13, 2020 12:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
They've already rejected the idea of stealing the election for trump. My god, you thought we were deranged? This is all bananas.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 13, 2020 03:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No, it was a procedural rejection. The Court said there was no standing.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 15607
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 13, 2020 03:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"My god, you thought we were deranged?"

Short a banana, nuts and whipped cream for a banana split.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 13, 2020 04:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There are at least six cases at the Supreme Court, including the original PA case (the Court rejected injunctive relief, not the case itself). The Court is possibly waiting for the right case, and everyone knows Biden stole this election, including the justices. There is a slam dunk case at the WI supreme court. There are a few other state cases.

IP: Logged

iQ
Moderator

Posts: 6237
From: Lyra
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 03:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
58 Slam Dunk Cases lost so far.....

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 09:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I’ve only called this case a slam dunk.

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 16776
From: http://forum.astro.com/cgi/forum.cgi?action=viewprofile;username=u36170365
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 01:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jwhop:
"My god, you thought we were deranged?"

Short a banana, nuts and whipped cream for a banana split.


Looking in a mirror, are you?

IP: Logged

iQ
Moderator

Posts: 6237
From: Lyra
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 01:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think the Wisconsin Supreme Court slam dunked the slam dunk case into the circular file...
That is 59 Legal defeats now.

Unqualified lawyers, all rank amateurs and grifters.


You cannot force disenfranchisement of specific counties. If there is a claim of Voter Fraud, then it is valid across all counties including those that Trump won. Lets say 90% of Dem Votes in Red Counties were fraudulent, that quantum adds up to more than the disputed Dem Counties. This mathematical possibility is as valid as the other allegations by the Trump Legal Team.
Which means GOP could also have committed fraud in Kentucky where Mitch won despite just 30% approval rating.

This would mean the only fair recourse is a complete re-election, which is impractical because GOP appointees like Krebs have themselves certified that there has been no large-scale fraud. And there is no end to it, there will always be allegations of fraud from one side.

Tangible Proof could have helped but none stood up to judicial scrutiny.

And now the Electoral College has completed the Certification.


------------------
Astrology Articles

New Services and short readings

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 03:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's not over yet.

The point is to eliminate all ballots that were cast in such a way. No one has said otherwise.

IP: Logged

iQ
Moderator

Posts: 6237
From: Lyra
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 04:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Biden has won the official Electoral College Count of Certified Electors.

ZERO Faithless Electors.

Its official now.

Next steps for MAGA: Sedition and Treason?

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 05:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It is not official.
http://m.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-georgia-nevada-and-arizona-republican-electors-cast-votes-for-trump_3618147.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2 020-12-14-5

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 14, 2020 10:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WI used another procedural excuse. I guess these judges are all afraid if their houses burning. Tomorrow, I’ll post what the dissenting Chief Justice said. It had nothing to do with evidence.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 135592
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 15, 2020 10:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[Dissenting] Chief Justice Patience Drake Boogensack: "...a significant portion of the public does not believe that the November 3, 2020, presidential election was fairly conducted. Once again, four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast.

"...four members of this court throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them."

[Dissenting] Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler: "Every single voter in this state is harmed when a vote is cast in contravention of the statutes..."

"doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine confidence and spawn needless litigation."

"This is not the rule of law; it is the rule of judicial activism through inaction."

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2020

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a