|
Author
|
Topic: The Lawsuit That Seals The Deal
|
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 136200
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 31, 2020 09:23 PM
  
http://m.theepochtimes.com/ruling-in-gohmert-lawsuit-could-be-big-game-changer-for-vote-count-on-jan-6-expert-says_3639789.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=bre aking-2020-12-31-4IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 1249
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted December 31, 2020 11:00 PM
Pence is asking that the lawsuit be thrown out. quote:
BREAKING REPORT: VP Mike Pence ASKS JUDGE TO TOSS GOP lawmaker's bid to overturn election results...
Not sure to take this at face value though. There's probably a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't know about. This may not be related but Potus announced rather cryptically something going into effect tomorrow, January 1st, that nobody knows about that sounds like a big deal. http://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1344785958475071496 IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 136200
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 01, 2021 04:44 PM
I think Pence is asking not to be the deciding the factor. The important part of this lawsuit is that it be determined that the "House" means the state legislatures. If that happens, it is all over for Biden and Harris. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 1249
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted January 01, 2021 06:48 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
I think Pence is asking not to be the deciding the factor. The important part of this lawsuit is that it be determined that the "House" means the state legislatures. If that happens, it is all over for Biden and Harris.
Oh, are the state legislatures stepping up? Also, I found out that what President Trump was referring to had to with health care and unrelated to election fraud. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 16940
From: http://forum.astro.com/cgi/forum.cgi?action=viewprofile;username=u36170365
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 01, 2021 08:08 PM
Is this the one that was just thrown out?IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 136200
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 02, 2021 12:20 AM
“Lack of standing”: The go-to ruling for a corrupt judiciary, along with ripeness and laches.IP: Logged |
Blind writer
Knowflake Posts: 856
From: Texas, USA
Registered: May 2012
|
posted January 02, 2021 12:51 AM
It was dismissed without prejudice, which means the judge had no opinion on the case, nor of its merits, nor of the constitutional question raised, and is a lenient ruling to allow this case to proceed up the chain of higher courts. The judge also stated lack of jurisdiction, implying a higher court will have to make a ruling on this. It’s already been appealed to the 5th Circuit.Court dismissal order Court final judgment I honestly don’t expect anything from this case, though. It’s hard enough to figure out who exactly to sue and who exactly should be doing the suing when challenging the constitutionality of the ECA. Worse yet, when the count hasn’t happened yet, but by then, wouldn’t it be too late? I don’t expect anything to come of this. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 1249
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted January 02, 2021 01:20 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
“Lack of standing”: The go-to ruling for a corrupt judiciary, along with ripeness and laches.
Right. No courts have heard the evidence and no cases have been decided based on the merits. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 16940
From: http://forum.astro.com/cgi/forum.cgi?action=viewprofile;username=u36170365
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 02, 2021 04:56 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
“Lack of standing”: The go-to ruling for a corrupt judiciary, along with ripeness and laches.
But if they'd taken the case, they suddenly wouldn't be seen as corrupt. They did the right thing. IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
