posted January 28, 2021 12:14 PM            

I have been on WSB for 2 years now. I found the forum quite entertaining due to their idgaf about political correctness and their bravado in trading and posting wins and losses and egging each other. The drama! There were occasional racist or homophobic jokes here and there, so what, I wouldn't say it it was the main flavor of WSB. Certainly not the reason to shut down the site.

But I am sure because WSB dgaf about PC and identify politics, AND they are giving headaches to hedge funds managers, they will soon be labeled domestic terrorists and they will be deplatformed.

posted January 28, 2021 12:40 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
And Robinhood which many of them used has shown its rear end by only allowing sells.

They will make Robinhood pay for that betrayal.

---

Lawsuits at the ready, I see. Excellent.

posted January 28, 2021 12:45 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by shura:
Lawsuits at the ready, I see. Excellent.

I will tell you a secret about my highly secretive scorpio self, Belage. I do not support a race war, but I am all for a class war. This is how we bring down the beast.

---

Interesting point of view. That is true marxism you know. Marxism does not believe race matters. It believes class matters way more than race.

posted January 28, 2021 01:29 PM            

I have no real issue with a loose social hierarchy. And if Im honest with myself, at heart Im a monarchist. But with the understanding that when the elites fail the people, the people must take them down.

quote:

---

We can take down the outside beast, but the inside beast will create another outside beast. Such is the nature of humans when they are unevolved.

---

posted January 28, 2021 02:10 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by shura:
Traditional Marxism, arguably. In practice that theory often went belly. Either way, modern Marxism (Im using the term broadly) has adapted. Race struggle proved to be a better brand than class struggle in the US. Something something original sin. Im sure you recall the failed Occupy.

I have no real issue with a loose social hierarchy. And if Im honest with myself, at heart Im a monarchist. But with the understanding that when the elites fail the people, the people must take them down.

I have accepted the same, yes. Its an endless game. But we must play it through.

---

You are a fascinating scorpio.

I have studied in depth classical marxism back when I thought it would save the world. I am not too familiar with neo-marxism, but I would imagine it would readily incorporate (meaning, co-opt) race struggle in an attempt to utilize every crack in the facade to bring down the system.

My issue with marxism is that the ones who end up in charge of ruling the rest of the plebeian classes act no better than the previous rulers. Every.Single.Time.

posted January 28, 2021 03:37 PM            

Everyone who wanted to follow him, he told them all the same, if you want to follow me, you have to give up your wealth.

Ok, but what most either forget, look over, or don't dig further into is, that this wealth went into a common pot that was not to be used for them and their needs but for the poor etc they came across.

And this was not a "well if you feel like it" kind of thing. It was a firm command and he turned away folks like Nicodemus who couldn't hack it (he later came back and did what was so hard for him to do).

So when ultra right wingers hurl the epitaphs of "socialist" or "communist" as an insult, I without shame say, "well, I am a follower of Yeshua". (wink, wink, smile).

Granted, politically speaking such systems are very risky when you are dealing with corrupt people. Hence, politically speaking, I'm not actually either of those, but closest to anarchist, which does not mean "chaos". That is convenient propaganda. Most humans are decent hearted and are self organizing by nature. It is primarily the small percentage of people within the ASPD spectrum that cause most of the problems among humanity.

After the collapse, what will happen is that small communities will organically build up here and there, and over time, different communities will become devoted to different things, which people will become attracted to on a "like attracts and begets like" basis.

ASPD (psychopathy and sociopathy) in all its forms will not be tolerated. People will be more consciously and actively psychic as time goes on, and will start to see through such types more and more and not allow them into positions of power/influence like we do now because most humans are so easy to fool and/or lack self love and thus attract/are attracted to slower vibratory systems and peoples.

The problem for and of government, is ever one of psychopathy. We mistakenly think we need government to keep these at bay. "What will happen if we have no government, all the Joker types will come and get us!"

And yet, what always happens over time? The in the closet, quiet, non obvious Joker types worm their way into government and co opt it, and then society starts breaking down over time.

Believe it or not, but we are finally coming up to a cycle when humanity has the very real potential to completely break that pattern. Attunement to divine, Source like Love has interesting effects on a person. It tends to expand, clarify, and make more accurate their perceptual capacity. As this starts to become more collective in nature (and it will, and has started already to some extent), everything else will change for the better.

posted January 28, 2021 05:32 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by teasel:
Conservatives are supposedly muzzled, but I saw trump Jr. weighing in on this.

The people who stormed the capitol, tried to kill people, and overthrow an election, are domestic terrorists. That’s exactly what they are - like Timothy McVeigh. It was just another day in sociopathic trump’s America, and that will be his legacy.

---

As if Junior is a conservative. lol

posted January 28, 2021 05:50 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosion:
Interestingly, Yeshua was sort of a "communist". Don't believe me?

Everyone who wanted to follow him, he told them all the same, if you want to follow me, you have to give up your wealth.

Ok, but what most either forget, look over, or don't dig further into is, that this wealth went into a common pot that was not to be used for them and their needs but for the poor etc they came across.

And this was not a "well if you feel like it" kind of thing. It was a firm command and he turned away folks like Nicodemus who couldn't hack it (he later came back and did what was so hard for him to do).

So when ultra right wingers hurl the epitaphs of "socialist" or "communist" as an insult, I without shame say, "well, I am a follower of Yeshua". (wink, wink, smile).

---

One of the difference between Yeshua and communism is that Yeshua never advocated forcing people to give up their wealth or forcibly taking away their wealth. If you read carefully, the giving up of wealth was something they were to do willingly.

Morever, if you read that chapter, you will see that before Yeshua told this young man who was asking him what he should do,
Jesus looked at him and loved him. Mark 10:21

That was not said with anger, with hatred, with guilt tripping. That was said with love. So unless you can tell me that communism is telling people with love that they must give up their wealth, there is absolutely no comparisation with Yeshua.

And that is on the superficial interpretation of the scripture. There are so many deeper levels of interpretation. What does it mean to give up one's wealth? Are we really asked to give up EVERYTHING we have and live on the street as homeless? Obviously this cannot be the the right interpretation. Yeshua spent time at the home of wealthy people. Ate at their tables. Healed their loved ones. Was buried in the tomb of a wealthy follower, Joseph of Arimathea.

posted January 28, 2021 05:55 PM            

quote:

---

Interestingly, Yeshua was sort of a "communist". Don't believe me?
Everyone who wanted to follow him, he told them all the same, if you want to follow me, you have to give up your wealth.

Ok, but what most either forget, look over, or don't dig further into is, that this wealth went into a common pot that was not to be used for them and their needs but for the poor etc they came across.

And this was not a "well if you feel like it" kind of thing. It was a firm command and he turned away folks like Nicodemus who couldn't hack it (he later came back and did what was so hard for him to do).

So when ultra right wingers hurl the epitaphs of "socialist" or "communist" as an insult, I without shame say, "well, I am a follower of Yeshua". (wink, wink, smile).

---

This old 'Jesus as social activist' take is one born of materialism. The Cosmic Christ didn't incarnate to collect a tithe. Speaking of, who was in charge of the common pot o money? Oh yeah. Judas. The one who couldn't see the Christ past his obsession with revolt, political action, and fair distribution of money. Ive been there and I recognize my brother and his blindness.

Lazarus was wealthy, evidenced by his burial, and was not asked to relinquish his wealth as was the 'rich young man' of Matthew and Mark. Why? Lazarus was not attached to his wealth, it made no mark on his soul, it did not impede his spiritual refinement. ("With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible") The young rich man was crippled by his attachment. That's the key. Not the money, but the attachment.

Nicodemus' high state is shown by his "nighttime" conversation with Christ.

posted January 28, 2021 06:05 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
You are a fascinating scorpio.

I have studied in depth classical marxism back when I thought it would save the world. I am not too familiar with neo-marxism, but I would imagine it would readily incorporate (meaning, co-opt) race struggle in an attempt to utilize every crack in the facade to bring down the system.

My issue with marxism is that the ones who end up in charge of ruling the rest of the plebeian classes act no better than the previous rulers. Every.Single.Time.

That is why at heart I am a libertarian. I have learned to distrust big government.

---

ty, without the eye there is no light.

posted January 28, 2021 08:22 PM            

First seek kingdom of heaven and rest should follow. As long as these folks are not attached to their wealth, Jesus surely approves them. Osho had 100s of Rolls ROyce to prove a point. Our morality is superficial. Look at the long faces at church. When the veil was lifted, everyone knew the Roman catholics worship Jesus son of Lucifer. Go search on you tube to see recordings that are publicly open these days. No one is hiding who they belong to any more.

posted January 28, 2021 09:23 PM            

https://docs.reclaimthenet.org/robinhood-class-action.pdf

Those kids are not playing.

posted January 30, 2021 08:30 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosion:
Edgar Cayce's work/guidance indicates quite plainly that Nicodemus was the young, wealthy man who initially could not give up his wealth, but then later came back and did.

I was not advocating political communism as I earlier stated, and plainly stated, it can and has been used wrongly by political powers.

---

Not familiar with Cayce so can't speak to this

posted February 03, 2021 06:41 PM            

quote:

---

This is the class action lawsuit just filed against Robinhood for preventing the buys of Gamespot.

---

Unconstitutional. Just as everything is happening around us these days. Does any body care at all?