Posts: 143409
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 06:53 PM            

---

Based on religious grounds--this is a huge win for religious liberty.

IP: Logged

Posts: 1725
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted June 17, 2021 07:16 PM            

---

*added
May be they should allow opposite sex children to be fostered. For example if two men who are married, they should be able to adopt girls not boys. Cannot trust men

SCOTUS should look in to it.

---On same sex union recognition

They want to keep you polarized. Hope all states grant equal rights to all. Even in gay men there is a top and a bott. Polarized. In Lesbians they have a dyke too lol.

Union should be allowed. It is up to the state though. Rural , backward states are behind modern awareness.

IP: Logged

Posts: 18732
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 07:39 PM            

---

Religious liberty?? What about liberty for all?

IP: Logged

Posts: 18732
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 07:44 PM            

---

What if church leaders had told you to mask up, and social distance? What if they said that everything should remain closed?

IP: Logged

Posts: 4458
From: USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 07:55 PM            

---

I think it is fair.

If an organization like Catholic Charities does not grant certification to same sex couples on religious ground, they are within their rights.

I think same-sex couples can find children to foster through non religious agencies. There are plenty of them.

IP: Logged

Posts: 143409
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 09:33 PM            

---

Exactly!

IP: Logged

Posts: 143409
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 17, 2021 09:52 PM            

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by teasel:
What if church leaders had told you to mask up, and social distance? What if they said that everything should remain closed?

---

Bad analogy much?

IP: Logged

Posts: 18732
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 18, 2021 12:32 AM            

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Bad analogy much?

---

It wasn’t an analogy, I was just wondering. Like: god wants you to protect as many people as possible. He doesn’t want you to fill churches and other places, and endanger others. You can pray at home, you can gather over the phone, or the internet, and he will hear you just the same.

That kind of thing.

IP: Logged

Posts: 143409
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 18, 2021 09:03 AM            

---

I doubt you know what God wants. Churches did exactly that for months until many of them realized that they should be allowed to remain physically open like other businesses, and they did social distancing and did wear masks. Upon attempting to open like other businesses, some were fined and others arrested in states and cities run by Dems, violating their Constitutional right to worship as they see fit. In Vegas, for example, you could gamble, but you couldn’t go to church. And you could go to strip clubs. These same Dem leaders joined in protests. I guess the virus is intelligent. Your analogy or question is ignorant. So what if churches said everything should remain closed? That comparison is ridiculous. We are talking about them being forced to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs by the government.

IP: Logged

Posts: 1725
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted June 18, 2021 09:32 AM            

---

May be they should allow opposite sex children to be fostered. For example if two men who are married, they should be able to adopt girls not boys. Cannot trust men

SCOTUS should look in to it.

IP: Logged