posted September 03, 2021 02:10 PM            

Historically, humans have ALWAYS fared better when the climate warmed vs when it cooled. Much of the Earth's last million years has been spent primarily in Ice Ages, which was very hard on our ancestors and then later on us.

And just even in more recent times, the Maunder Minimum and little Ice age, were hell on humanity. Modern Homo Sapiens are not built for the cold. And is it any surprise that our population has expanded so much and we have thrived so well during this unusual, relatively short warming trend?

Not well known, but from about the 50's to about 2000, the Sun was in a larger cycle called a Grand Solar Maximum wherein it was unusually active and energetic. It was pumping more energy into the earth than for a long time before or since. Around 2000 or so, it started to shift back into a more normal pattern.

The main climate panels and climate scientists for most of the iterations of their models only included Solar irradiance in their data for Solar variability. If one understands anything about Solar energy and how it effects and impacts the earth, then one understands that this is beyond bloody ridiculous, it is a travesty of crap science at its worst. All those Solar storms pumping various different kinds of energy into the Earth completely discounted and even worse, because Solar Storms and Sunspots actually REDUCE Solar irradiance, in their models it made it look like there was LESS Solar energy! Simply unbelievable that these folks call themselves "scientists" and that people think them credible.

The Oceans are like giant heat sink and reservoir and it takes years and years for them to dissipate all the heat energy they gained over that half of century of a hyper active Sun, hence there is still somewhat a warming trend. After this Solar maximum cycle ends, the Sun is likely go quiet and rather passive for awhile.

Once it does that, and once the oceans dissipate all that extra heat, things are going to get much colder. And I particularly pity/feel bad for northern Europe because the Beaufort Gyre current is getting close to finally dumping all that accumulated cold, fresh water back into the main currents, and once that happens, northern Europe will be experiencing only two seasons for a long time. A very long winter, and a very short spring.

This change will happen fast once the B.G. does release all that pent up cold, fresh water.

posted September 03, 2021 03:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Facts and rational thought like that don't matter to climate change alarmists. It's their religion.

---

It's far worse than that Randall. They are being funded by the billionaire plutocrats of the world which are very aware of the coming, very cataclysmic Earth changes that we can do nothing about, and they are deliberately distracting us from this deeper issue.

It is very hard to control a population of 7.5 billion or so people. But should that reduce down to 200 million or so, much more manageable (especially when you and your cronies have been storing resources underground for years and years). The less of us commoners who have the potential to help change things for the better survive, the easier the take over will be when it all goes down.

I've had precognitive dreams of seeing myself fight in battles against these asshats post collapse. And I'm not a pro violence person generally speaking. Things would have to be pretty extreme for me to partake in taking up arms as I've seen. My partner has had dreams of seeing FEMA camps try to honey trap people with the promise of food and shelter, and then turn these people into indentured servants or outright slaves. And the rebellious/unwilling ones get outright killed.

No, it is far worse than just mere distorted, dogmatic religion. Many of the scientists probably aren't aware of the deeper agendas at play though. Their math is flawless, but the equation is missing some important, key variables.