posted March 01, 2022 09:45 PM            

Well they were court ordered to start releasing 10,000 pages per day, or week, i can’t remember

Anyway the first batch has rolled out.
I know this is a tweet but it has four screen shots from a SMALL portion of what was released and I am just dumbfounded.

The sheer amount of adverse events on this list is one thing, but the events described is horrific.

Please take a look, how is this legal??? This is literally a death shot. I knew it was dangerous but holy sh*t, literal death shot.
http://twitter.com/sanrio_pilled/status/1498767607947837441?s=21

posted March 01, 2022 09:49 PM            

full document here

posted March 02, 2022 03:59 PM            

I am waiting to see this on more legitimate websites, notably the ICAN website who spearheaded the lawsuit that forced the FDA to release the documents within an 8 month frame instead of 75 years. .

posted March 02, 2022 04:31 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
I don't know if this information is legit.

I am waiting to see this on more legitimate websites, notably the ICAN website who spearheaded the lawsuit that forced the FDA to release the documents within an 8 month frame instead of 75 years. .

---

That source is a government website. It is legit. The only thing i messed up is they’re records from november 2022 and not part of the legal demand of release of 10,000 pages for 8 months that was ordered.

posted March 02, 2022 05:04 PM            

So this does not seem like the very latest news on the matter.

posted March 02, 2022 05:06 PM            

https://www.icandecide.org/

posted March 03, 2022 07:15 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
The 2nd link you posted is a pdf that doesn't open up to anything, and it shows in the URL the date of 2021...

So this does not seem like the very latest news on the matter.

Again, I will wait until I see the news reported in legitimate websites who have made it their business to deal with the issue.

---

I said november 2021. obviously it was a typo to write “november 2022”

i clicked on the link and it works fine for me. the documents were officially released today if you want to look at them but i’m assuming you won’t because for some reason you need a news anchor to tell you about it rather than read it for yourself. i’m not trying to be rude here but i just don’t understand the point in “i won’t believe it until a news source that i personally trust talks about it” when again, you can literally read the documents for yourself.

regardless, that link does work, it is legitimate, and has nine pages worth of adverse events. the documents released today i have not read but will be heading that way after typing this. i will link it here when finished if anyone would like to take the time to read through it for themselves. there’s obviously a reason they were trying to hide the info for 75 years. thank god they were legally ordered to release them now and all of it over the course of the next eight months.

also, i think it is quite peculiar that suddenly covid is over, they voted 48-47 to end the state of emergency for covid across the nation. i think they are hoping that if they just announce that covid is over then no one will care to hear the devastating news of the vaccine.

posted March 03, 2022 08:10 PM            

Not sure why you are criticizing my decision to wait to verify the news from websites that have proven themselves throughout this pandemic instead of anonymous sources on the internet...

posted March 04, 2022 07:27 AM            

2. 93% of all receivers had some or the other short term adverse effect.

3. 1200+ deaths out of 42000

4. Wuhan Lab Made Spike Protein CONFIRMED becomes DNA in the Liver [as I have written many times since 2021 due to ERV Reverse Transcriptase in the Human Genome].

5. Every person receiving an mRNA can technically be considered a Non-Human as their Genome is permanently changed with a Lab CReated Protein.

6. Existence of Luciferase also confirmed in official documents.

posted March 04, 2022 02:55 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PhoenixRising:
Also heard the spike proteins becomes DNA in the liver. Pundits are wondering about the impact now.

---

posted March 04, 2022 10:04 PM            

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

On page 4 of this link, you can see where the FDA documents started on March 1. When I clicked on the documents to open them, they were in text form requiring notepad.

It's going to take a while for seasoned scientists to decipher and put together the information in those documents. And yet, already on March 1, people were circulating documents that purported to be list of side effects from the Pfizer documents. That is not believable. If anyone has a legitimate link they would like to submit I would love to see it.

I suspect that the FDA/Pfizer are releasing the documents in a disparate manner, the way they would release disparate pieces of a puzzle that you can only put together after you have all the pieces. So I am going to be patient because we may only get a true measure of what is going on after all the documents are released.

posted March 05, 2022 12:12 AM            

I was not able to open the document Spacecadet shared on my Firefox browser. When I switched to the Brave browser, I was able to open it...

On page 7, after adding the numbers, it appears that out of a total of 42,086 people enrolled in the trials, 1223 people died. That's about 2% of fatalities.

The fatality rate of covid is supposed to be between 1% to 3%.

So in other words, they pushed a vaccine that had roughly the same fatality rate as the virus the vaccine was supposed to protect from.

posted March 05, 2022 12:18 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
UPDATE:

I was not able to open the document Spacecadet shared on my Firefox browser. When I switched to the Brave browser, I was able to open it...

On page 7, after adding the numbers, it appears that out of a total of 42,086 people enrolled in the trials, 1223 people died. That's about 2% of fatalities.

The fatality rate of covid is supposed to be between 1% to 3%.

So in other words, they pushed a vaccine that had roughly the same fatality rate as the virus the vaccine was supposed to protect from.

---

Not sure if you’ve checked your ICAN source in the last 24 hours but they updated it with the newly released Pfizer documents. Not sure if the information you’re listing here is from those documents or not but figured I’d mention.

posted March 05, 2022 12:32 AM            

On page 5 of the document, it says that "Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown."

So basically, it's possible there were even more deaths that were not reported...

And I am only talking about the fatalities. I am not even talking about the side effects, of which there is a long list.

And let us not even start talking about the long term side effects that might show up in a year or 2 or 5, since a new study has shown that the vaccine does alter the DNA...

posted March 05, 2022 12:36 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by spacecadet42420:
Not sure if you’ve checked your ICAN source in the last 24 hours but they updated it with the newly released Pfizer documents. Not sure if the information you’re listing here is from those documents or not but figured I’d mention.

Lots of suspicious stuff in there but i can’t seem to get my computer to show me anything from them. I pull up the HIV section and it’s just a list of “hiv reaction” over and over and over again. Same with the other documents. Not sure if it’s an issue just on my end or if this is happening for everyone but there are multiple multiple highly suspiciously titled documents in there that Id like to read

---

I checked, but the Pfizer data dump seems has tons of documents that we will not figure out until later. But this particular one that you posted and that I was finally able to open in my Brave browser is a doozy and is worthy of exploration.

I need to print it so I can really go through it with a fine tooth comb.

posted March 05, 2022 02:04 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
I checked, but the Pfizer data dump seems has tons of documents that we will not figure out until later. But this particular one that you posted and that I was finally able to open in my Brave browser is a doozy and is worthy of exploration.

I need to print it so I can really go through it with a fine tooth comb.

---

Do let us know if you find anything substantial. I only read through the side effects pages and that was enough to make my heart sink. I mean the aptitude of various types of herpes and neurological problems is insane. A lot of my family are fully vaccinated boosted and all and i fear for their lives. Some of the documents of the new information had even worse things than the original document i posted here. Still trying to figure out how to fully open them but i’m not that tech savvy however the HIV pages were heavy, several of them. Need them to fully open before i can speak on that but if this vaccine is giving people HIV and herpes we will surely soon see people lying about being vaccinated.

posted March 05, 2022 04:59 PM            

HIV is no longer an automatic death sentence, but it requires lifelong dependency on drugs since the immune system is compromised. If the vaccines indeed induce or create HIV in the population, a cynical conspiracy theorist could claim that through the vaccines, Big Pharma has created a new booming market for HIV drugs... I hope those fears are unfounded... We shall see...

posted March 05, 2022 10:02 PM            

Interestingly, biochemist Kary Mullis, who was instrumental in developing the PCR tech and analysis method, stated in an interview that he was very open and leaned to this very truth outlined above.

posted March 06, 2022 11:50 AM            

There seems to be some "confusion" or "debate" as to whether the document I was finally able to open in the Brave browser comes from the March 1, 2022 Pfizer data dump or was available before.

The following "fact checking" site claims this document is not new and was freely available before and calls the whole thing a hoax:
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/20 22/03/fact-check-pfizer-document-does-not-list-thousands-of-side-effects-from-its-covid-vaccine.html

The writer of the article has extensively worked for CNN (I know, red flag) and Lead Stories is part of a group of so called international "fact Checkers" funded by the Poynter Institute, which coincidentally received in 2015 $382,997 from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2015/11/opp1138320
They also list other donors such Google, Facebook, U.S. Department of State, so it's up to you to decide if you find them trustworthy.

posted March 06, 2022 07:05 PM            

Page 6....As I am looking at the printed document, I need to make a correction.

The number 42,086 I cited is NOT the total number of people enrolled in the trial. It is the number of CASES REPORTED covering the period of December 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. So the fatalities of 1,223 which amounts to 2.5% is NOT the number of fatalities for people in the trial, but the percentage of fatalities among the reported cases.

Just wanted to correct and set this straight.

posted March 07, 2022 07:14 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
SECOND UPDATE:

There seems to be some "confusion" or "debate" as to whether the document I was finally able to open in the Brave browser comes from the March 1, 2022 Pfizer data dump or was available before.

The following "fact checking" site claims this document is not new and was freely available before and calls the whole thing a hoax:
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/20 22/03/fact-check-pfizer-document-does-not-list-thousands-of-side-effects-from-its-covid-vaccine.html

The writer of the article has extensively worked for CNN (I know, red flag) and Lead Stories is part of a group of so called international "fact Checkers" funded by the Poynter Institute, which coincidentally received in 2015 $382,997 from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2015/11/opp1138320
They also list other donors such Google, Facebook, U.S. Department of State, so it's up to you to decide if you find them trustworthy.

HOWEVER, in the spirit of being careful, I am going to hit PAUSE, and wait until the websites that are doing real investigative work and have the time and resource to do so like Dr. Mercola, ICAN, Pam Popper's Make America Free Again, and other sites who have earned my trust go through the data dump and give insight on what is real and what is not.

---

Again, like I have said multiple times in this post, the document that I posted, the original post of this thread, is a document from November of 2021. I've said it multiple times. So i'm saying it again because I think either you keep forgetting or you aren't seeing my comments or i'm not sure what the issue is. I hope I don't sound rude because I promise I'm not trying to. But I had corrected my typo of "november 2022" to "november 2021" because obviously november 2022 hasnt even happened yet. So I'm just confused why you keep coming back to make comments about the date of the original document. Reading through I clarified at three different comments that the original document is from November 2021 and is NOT part of the newly released pfizer data.

So again, just one more time, so no one who reads this is confused, the original document, the original comment of this thread, is from November 2021 and is NOT the newly released pfizer documents.

posted March 07, 2022 09:23 PM            

And it's not just you, but I know for a fact that the document is being passed around in many circles as being from the March 1 date. I see that even on the ICAN website...

posted March 07, 2022 09:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
^^^ I may have been confused about what you said in later posts regarding November 2021/2011 because your original post was all about this being part of the newly released March 1 documents and you never amended it in any way to indicate that it was incorrect.

And it's not just you, but I know for a fact that the document is being passed around in many circles as being from the March 1 date.

But anyway, I understand why you would feel that you have amply explained yourself and I apologize for any confusion on my part.

---

4th comment in the thread, I amend my mistakes and explain how the document is from november 2021. this is the same comment where i made the typo and put “november 2022”