Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Judicial Watch Sues Fani Willis

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Judicial Watch Sues Fani Willis
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 184706
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 16, 2024 11:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Judicial Watch Sues Fani Willis for Communications with Jack Smith, Pelosi Committee

District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seem to have provided false information about having no records of communications with Jack Smith and the Pelosi January 6 committee.

We filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against Willis and the county for records of any communication they had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)).

We sued in the Superior Court of Fulton County, GA, after Willis and the county denied having any records responsive to an August 2023 Georgia Open Records Act request for:
All documents and communications sent to, received from, or relating to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office.

All documents and communications sent to or received from the United States House January 6th Committee or any of its employees.

We state in the lawsuit that Willis’ and the county’s “representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false.” We refer to a December 5, 2023, letter from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to Willis that cites a December 2021, letter from Willis to then-House January 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson. In that letter Willis requested assistance from the committee and offered to travel to DC. Jordan writes:
Specifically, you asked Rep. Thompson for access to “record [sic] includ[ing] but . . . not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel.” You even offered that you and your staff were eager to travel to Washington, D.C, to “meet with investigators in person” and to receive these records “any time” between January 31, 2022, and February 25, 2022.

We argue: “Willis’s letter to [former] Chairman Thompson is plainly responsive to the request, yet it was neither produced to Plaintiff in response to the request nor claimed to be subject to exemption from production under the Open Records Act.”

We also cite recent news reports and other records which “indicate that representatives of Willis’s office traveled to Washington, DC, and met with January 6 Select Committee staffers in April, May, and November 2022, as Willis proposed in her December 17, 2021 letter …”

We state that a January 2024, Politico report titled “Jan. 6 committee helped guide days of Georgia Trump probe” and a January 2024, letter from the House Judiciary Committee to Fulton County Special Prosecutor Nathan J. Wade are examples that “Such meetings plainly had to be coordinated and likely generated communications if not other records about or memorializing these meetings.”

Any such records would be responsive to our request, the lawsuit states.

On January 30, 2024, we announced that we filed a lawsuit against Fulton County for records regarding the hiring of Wade as a special prosecutor by Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

In October 2023, we sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 19676
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 17, 2024 10:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think Willis and the Georgia case is in real trouble.
One of the reasons is the collusion and coordination between this state prosecution and the White House...along with federal prosecutor, Jack Smith pulling the strings on this state prosecution.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2023

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a