posted April 27, 2024 07:34 PM
lol. this guy who is a plant, who gets gifts from billionaires, to vote a certain way, is questioning Jack Smith's legitimacy. Clarence Thomas' wife was a part of the coup attempt. He should have recused himself.
Posts: 186312 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
posted April 27, 2024 08:05 PM
Who cares what or who you question? Justice Thomas is correct. The appointment of Smith was unconstitutional. Smith has no authority to even be a dogcatcher.
Posts: 19891 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
posted April 27, 2024 11:08 PM
quote:Originally posted by Randall: Who cares what or who you question? Justice Thomas is correct. The appointment of Smith was unconstitutional. Smith has no authority to even be a dogcatcher.
Exactly. There is a process for appointing a special counsel. It wasn't followed when Merritless Garland allegedly appointed Jack Smith.
Everything Jack Smith has done is 'null and void'.