Posts: 198068
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 10, 2025 09:34 PM            

---

Typically, prosecutors have prosecutorial immunity. And once a judge gains jurisdiction, a judge has immunity. Bragg wouldn’t even tell the defense what the alleged crime was until the jury was in session. President Trump should have refused to make a plea on fake crimes that don’t even exist. Once you make a plea, you give the judge jurisdiction and almost unlimited power. For example, what if a rogue prosecutor claimed it were a felony crime to eat a banana in public? Once you plead not guilty, you can be convicted of a crime that doesn’t exist (eating that banana in public. You should have challenged the court’s jurisdiction. It would. It be s typical jurisdictional challenge. You would insist upon seeing the crime that you are being accused of violating. Crimes also have elements that must be met. But a rogue judge can mislead a jury. This one said the jury didn’t even have to be unanimous in what the second crime was (that made the bookkeeping error a felony)!

But wait! There’s more! There is an exception that cuts through immunity: 18 USC Sections 241 and 242 make it a felony to conspire to deprive any citizen of his Constitutional rights under color of law. While these were historically intended as civil rights statutes, they apply in any legal context. This is exactly what Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis did when they met with Hack Smith! President Trump should let Pam Bondi file charges against all of those lawfare bozos, to prevent this from ever happening again.

IP: Logged