Author
|
Topic: Judge Arrested For Breaking Immigration Laws
|
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 12:55 PM
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fbi-director-says-agents-arrested-judge-for-obstructing-immigration-operation/ar-AA1DCqcW?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=8d558928a47d4b998939def22b3631 0a&ei=8IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 01:09 PM
She didn’t break the law. Your conman is breaking the law. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 01:30 PM
Do you even know the law?IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 03:57 PM
This. Is. Fascism. IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 03:57 PM
IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 03:59 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: Do you even know the law?
You went to law school, and you are supporting trump’s lot when they ignore the law. When they break the law. You elected a man who broke the law, I don’t know how many times now, and before. IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 05:42 PM
Washington post poll of independents, shows the majority are against Trump on all of this. On immigration/deportation. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 06:50 PM
Because your leftist media and other nut jobs say so? President Trump isn’t breaking any laws. Judges should know better. No one is above the law, right? Independents are split. Most Dems agree with President Trump on deportations. It’s time to put lawless judges behind bars. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 07:21 PM
This illegal immigrant was deported. He was on trial for beating two women. He returned. Returning after deportation is a felony. This judge let him escape out of a private back door of her own chambers while on trial and with his victims also in the courtroom. That is aiding and abetting (two kinds of federal obstruction and concealment). Why do you all of a sudden support men who batter women? She is an accessory and will never be able to be a judge again. She is looking at a long prison sentence. She will be trading her black robe for an orange jump suit. The other judge was harboring a fugitive and letting him use his gun with a suppressor. I thought you were against guns? Let me educate you about the law. They are breaking 8 USC 1324. Judges know this law. They deserve what they get. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 09:25 PM
1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) OffensesTitle 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3). Alien Smuggling -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien. Domestic Transporting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law. Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation. Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law. Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses. Bringing Aliens to the United States -- Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens). Unit of Prosecution -- With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs. Knowledge -- Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient. Penalties -- The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses. IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 10:05 PM
https://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/011707.htmlIP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 10:08 PM
Who is going to arrest the DOJ for breaking laws? They’ve human trafficked three children who are United States citizens. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 25, 2025 10:56 PM
Why do you support woman beating?IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2025 12:14 AM
The journalists are next. http://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1915942526927736897 IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2025 12:16 AM
So? You are the biggest hypocrite! Obama actually ARRESTED journalists that he didn’t like. 🤷♀️ IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 30626 From: Here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2025 02:57 PM
So, the judge in question sent this man out into a hallway where the agents were, and the agents did nothing. She didn’t hide him, didn’t send him in a different room direction. They ****** up, at a job they weren’t even supposed to be doing, because what they are doing is illegal. Got it. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2025 04:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by teasel: So, the judge in question sent this man out into a hallway where the agents were, and the agents did nothing. She didn’t hide him, didn’t send him in a different room direction. They ****** up, at a job they weren’t even supposed to be doing, because what they are doing is illegal. Got it.
Wrong. You are always wrong. She rushed him away from the agents through her private chambers jury entrance and through a door outside, where the agents were waiting for him. He absconded, and they chased and easily caught him. Where tf do you get your information? This is textbook obstruction. It only took 13 pages to file the criminal complaint against her. What they are doing is not illegal. This is federal law. You just sound ignorant every time you say that. IP: Logged |
Belage2 Knowflake Posts: 324 From: Registered: Jan 2025
|
posted April 27, 2025 04:29 PM
What we know about the man the judge was trying to help evade ICE: https://www.yahoo.com/news/know-eduardo-flores-ruiz-man-230751843.html Why was Flores-Ruiz in court on April 18? Flores-Ruiz is charged with three counts of misdemeanor battery, domestic violence and infliction of physical harm, a criminal complaint detailed. His charges stemmed from a March 12 fight that occurred between Flores-Ruiz and two roommates after he was accused of playing music too loudly in the home. The complaint says Flores-Ruiz punched one roommate 30 times, then hit a woman who tried to end the fight. ... NOTE: Of course, one can argue that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, and the trial had not concluded yet when ICE tried to arrest him... It will be interesting to see how this plays out for the Judge. Was she legally and/or morally right to interfere with ICE if she felt the man was not getting due process? I do not know, but I can't help shake my head at the kind of people the dems rush to defend and protect... IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2025 08:08 PM
Judges are required to obey the law. They can't be activists. She had to defer to Federal law, regardless of her personal beliefs. She was aware of that law, and she chose to break it. She will face the consequences--the least of which will be losing her job as a judge and likely her law license entirely. It was two felonies, and we know how tough Bondi is. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2025 08:11 PM
She will get her due process.IP: Logged |
Belage2 Knowflake Posts: 324 From: Registered: Jan 2025
|
posted April 27, 2025 09:10 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: Judges are required to obey the law. They can't be activists. She had to defer to Federal law, regardless of her personal beliefs. She was aware of that law, and she chose to break it. She will face the consequences--the least of which will be losing her job as a judge and likely her law license entirely. It was two felonies, and we know how tough Bondi is.
Thank you for your legal insight!  IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 203116 From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2025 09:15 PM
You're welcome. Immigration law is clear. Jurisdiction dictates authority. As it relates to immigration, ICE and the FBI are allowed to make arrests anywhere that illegal immigrants are located. Intervening is obstruction and is a felony. She adjourned the case against him even though the sone sees showed up to testify.IP: Logged |