Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Pregnant US woman declared brain dead is being kept alive under state abortion law

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Pregnant US woman declared brain dead is being kept alive under state abortion law
teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 30902
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 16, 2025 09:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Doctors are keeping Adriana Smith on life support months after medical emergency until baby is ready, family says

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/15/pregnant-georgia-woman-brain-dead-abortion-law

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 30902
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 16, 2025 09:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A pregnant woman in Georgia was declared brain dead after a medical emergency and doctors have kept her on life support for three months so far to allow enough time for the baby to be born and comply with Georgia’s strict anti-abortion law, family members say.

She could be kept in that state for months more.

The case is the latest consequence of abortion bans introduced in some states since the US supreme court in 2022 overturned national abortion rights afforded by the historic Roe v Wade ruling.

Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old mother and nurse, was declared brain dead – meaning she is legally dead – in February, her mother, April Newkirk, told Atlanta TV station WXIA.

Newkirk said her daughter had intense headaches more than three months ago and went to Atlanta’s Northside hospital, where she received medication and was released. The next morning, her boyfriend woke to her gasping for air and called 911. Emory University hospital determined she had blood clots in her brain and she was declared brain dead.

Newkirk said Smith was now 21 weeks pregnant. Removing breathing tubes and other life-saving devices would probably kill the fetus.

Northside did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday. Emory Healthcare said it could not comment on an individual case because of privacy rules, but released a statement saying it “uses consensus from clinical experts, medical literature, and legal guidance to support our providers as they make individualized treatment recommendations in compliance with Georgia’s abortion laws and all other applicable laws. Our top priorities continue to be the safety and wellbeing of the patients we serve.”

Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected in the fetus – generally around six weeks into pregnancy.

The law was adopted in 2019 but not enforced until after Roe v Wade was overturned in the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling, opening the door to state abortion bans. Twelve states are enforcing bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy and three others have bans such as Georgia’s that kick in after about six weeks.

Like the others, Georgia’s ban includes an exception if an abortion is necessary to maintain the woman’s life.

Smith’s family, including her five-year-old son, still visit her in the hospital.

Newkirk told WXIA that doctors told the family that the fetus has fluid on the brain and that they are concerned about his health.

“She’s pregnant with my grandson. But he may be blind, may not be able to walk, may not survive once he’s born,” Newkirk said. She has not said whether the family wants Smith removed from life support.

Monica Simpson, the executive director of SisterSong, the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging Georgia’s abortion law, said the situation was problematic.

“Her family deserved the right to have decision-making power about her medical decisions,” Simpson said in a statement. “Instead, they have endured over 90 days of retraumatization, expensive medical costs, and the cruelty of being unable to resolve and move toward healing.”

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 30902
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 16, 2025 09:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neVW-UGio2c&ab_channel=GrowingupVermont

What in the Handmaids Tale is going on here???

IP: Logged

PhoenixRising
Knowflake

Posts: 3717
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted May 17, 2025 12:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PhoenixRising     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
May be God wants to experience this part of life -- nature abhors habit and repetitiousness. It always seeks new experience. As for the baby -- it too will die in time if it turns out to be weak.

If I was in Coma ever-- I wish they keep me alive for minimum 7 days as I move between the veils . Only the materialists will pull the plug thinking there is no after life and lets save money . Remember Judas complaining on oil spent on Jesus's feet?.

IP: Logged

Belage2
Knowflake

Posts: 425
From:
Registered: Jan 2025

posted May 17, 2025 09:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Belage2     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I know that for some people, life in the womb holds zero value, but not everyone agrees with that philosophy.

The mum is already dead, and it is very sad, but there is the possibility of saving her baby, the innocent human life in her womb, and it should be attempted, if medical advances permit so.

I have seen people who are 80-90 years old in and out of hospital, getting all kinds of lifesaving care, and we find it normal to expand all this resource on people who don't have long to live. So how much more normal should it be to give new life, life in the womb, lifesaving care?

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 204189
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 18, 2025 01:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Would the mother—upon knowing that she was going to die—wish for her baby to live? I’d say the odds are very good she would have, given the choice.

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 30902
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009

posted May 18, 2025 12:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This woman’s body does not belong to the State, but they are acting like it does.

They just want to control women, they do not are about that baby who won’t be okay.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2025

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a