Posts: 216971
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 20, 2026 03:14 PM            

---

There are a few other laws that can be used, including the Tariff Act of 1930 and of 1974 under Section 301. It was actually a win because the Court gave its thumbs up to tariffs—just not under that law being used because tariffs aren’t specifically
mentioned. Of course, Dems are lying about the ruling. The Court did not address the return of collected taxes, so it affects only the future. Section 301 is more cumbersome to implement.

IP: Logged

Posts: 1590
From:
Registered: Jan 2025

posted February 20, 2026 03:29 PM            

---

Quite a new development!

Does that mean the current tariffs have to be removed or deactivated at once?

Also, the other laws that might be used as alternatives, wouldn't they also be challenged in court?

IP: Logged

Posts: 1590
From:
Registered: Jan 2025

posted February 20, 2026 04:10 PM            

---

Duplicate

IP: Logged

Posts: 216971
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 20, 2026 06:29 PM            

---

Some countries may try to get their money back. It depends on what the contracts say, but I'm doubtful it will be successful. The Trump Admin was prepared for a loss. The tariffs have already halted and will be replaced with a new 10 percent global tariff under Section 301. It takes effect soon. The other laws are more unilateral and give POTUS the right to tariff. President Trump just wanted to save time. It was difficult for the plaintiff government to argue an emergency when so many nations were tariffed. However, companies will have a remedy (countries will honor their trade agreements), so there will be some lawsuits. I'm thinking that President Trump will say if they want to do business in this country, they will let the tariff (as paid) alone and then replace it with the new mechanism. It is all negotiable.

IP: Logged