|
Author
|
Topic: What sign would be into virgins (or sign combos?)
|
asclibrasagsun
Knowflake Posts: 1787
From: Mälmo, Sweden
Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted June 30, 2013 09:09 PM
  
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
By extension, then the insecurities ought to apply to fat, short, unmuscular, unmusical, uneducated, math challenged, verbiage challenged, untraveled and broke men. Or those with short, skinny, limp dicks.
that was harsh but it is probably something along these lines lol, I would just combine all these terms and say LOSER because that term would definitely sum up those qualities it actually depends only on one thing...and that thing is the ATTITUDE AND PERSONALITY of the male. IP: Logged |
Jessica2407
Knowflake Posts: 2611
From: Saturn
Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 02:31 AM
Why would a guy treat a woman any differently than another woman if she is a virgin? The same for guys. Why would a woman treat a guy any differently if he is a virgin? I don't get it.Or course if a guy only wants to have a good time in the sack am 100% sure he won't come knocking on the door of a virgin. BUt if the guy genuinely likes to spend time with her, I think he would respect her choice and wait for the right moment if that is what she wants.IT may have nothing to do with self confidence, it could mean it is by choice or waiting for the right person. That being said, I have not met a guy till now who is a virgin. My Leo Ex used to brag for HOURS on end about his sexual escapades. That turned me off sooooo bad, like it's the most boring thing I had to listen to. IP: Logged |
aquaguy91
Moderator Posts: 6854
From: tennessee
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 03:09 AM
As for clingliness, I wasn't aware most girls want sex for the sake of sex. What happened to love and emotional closeness? So, F for F's sake? Well. We've come full circle, haven't we?[/B][/QUOTE]
Welcome to the 21st century..
IP: Logged |
PixieJane
Knowflake Posts: 2522
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted July 01, 2013 06:57 AM
Clinginess isn't emotional closeness, or it's not a HEALTHY one anyway. I'm actually at a loss of words that they're seen as the same thing so just here:
x
http://www.wikihow.com/Be-Less-Clingy and
http://voices.yahoo.com/how-avoid-being-clingy-loving-relationship-1320839.html If you don't have the attention span for that, then a brief, humorous example of clingy (though real life versions can be much worse than this):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHhF6ngsedQ But hey, if you can't tell the difference between someone intimate and loving and someone clinging, controlling, and smothering, then here's the woman for you!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh0AhrY9GjA IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake Posts: 5354
From:
Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted July 01, 2013 07:39 AM
quote:
Originally posted by aquaguy91:
As for clingliness, I wasn't aware most girls want sex for the sake of sex. What happened to love and emotional closeness? So, F for F's sake? Well. We've come full circle, haven't we?Welcome to the 21st century..
Wait. Nixon isn't President anymore? IP: Logged |
aquaguy91
Moderator Posts: 6854
From: tennessee
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 11:52 AM
@ yta, afraid not.
IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake Posts: 5354
From:
Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted July 01, 2013 01:28 PM
quote:
Originally posted by aquaguy91:
@ yta, afraid not.
Well.. guess what? We've indeed come full circle. Ask you mom about "free love" in the 60s lol BTW, my first rock concert was as a toddler in Liverpool. My parents were crazy about a rebel boy group called the Beatles. But perhaps you don't know them lol IP: Logged |
aquaguy91
Moderator Posts: 6854
From: tennessee
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 02:15 PM
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
Well.. guess what? We've indeed come full circle.Ask you mom about "free love" in the 60s lol BTW, my first rock concert was as a toddler in Liverpool. My parents were crazy about a rebel boy group called the Beatles. But perhaps you don't know them lol
my mother was a child in the 60s (born in 58). I sure hope she doesn't know anything about free love.  But yes, things have definitely changed and not for the better. The whole world becomes more morally depraved everyday. Its a miracle that God hasn't said "screw it!" and smited us all.
IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake Posts: 5354
From:
Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted July 01, 2013 06:21 PM
Well, I'm a 63 and too young to experience "free love" in the Vietnam War era. And although I'm conservative, I would certainly have fit in well. Basically, it is what it was called. People passed each other around willingly. "Free love" was as wild as can be. From the generation came Bill Clinton, W Bush and Barry Obama. Need I say more?IP: Logged |
aquaguy91
Moderator Posts: 6854
From: tennessee
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 08:50 PM
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
Well, I'm a 63 and too young to experience "free love" in the Vietnam War era. And although I'm conservative, I would certainly have fit in well. Basically, it is what it was called. People passed each other around willingly. "Free love" was as wild as can be. From the generation came Bill Clinton, W Bush and Barry Obama. Need I say more?
I did not know you were 63. I thought you said you were born in 59. not sure where I got that IP: Logged |
aquaguy91
Moderator Posts: 6854
From: tennessee
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 01, 2013 09:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
Well, I'm a 63 and too young to experience "free love" in the Vietnam War era. And although I'm conservative, I would certainly have fit in well. Basically, it is what it was called. People passed each other around willingly. "Free love" was as wild as can be. From the generation came Bill Clinton, W Bush and Barry Obama. Need I say more?
I have a hard time understanding people today. They have morphed commitment and monogamy into bad things. Now they call them clingy and insecure lmao. My grandad met mamaw in knoxville in the fall of 1942 when he was home on leave from the army. They were at a dance at a country club and things went from there. By the end of the night he told her he loved her and wanted to marry her and when he had to leave he got her address and exchanged letters until they saw each other the next spring and that's when they had got married. How's that for clingy? lmao but their marriage lasted 35 years until death parted them. My mamaw never remarried after he died.
IP: Logged |
PixieJane
Knowflake Posts: 2522
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted July 01, 2013 09:39 PM
quote:
Originally posted by aquaguy91:
I have a hard time understanding people today. They have morphed commitment and monogamy into bad things. Now they call them clingy and insecure lmao
No, they haven't. Heck, some love it, which the popularity of Twilight (which in addition to other disturbing elements includes extreme clinginess on both sides, many who call this ideal even if I consider it nightmarish, and it's also ultimately an abstinence-only before marriage story) should show. But I think it's good you gave up on the dating scene as people really are beyond your ability to comprehend (let alone understand). However, most people who decide not to mess with it find other things to obsess about (or perhaps more accurately realized they had more fun doing something else and phased out dating in favor of it). Have you considered video games until you can find a new hobby? Once you're passed the "noob" stage I imagine you could find plenty of new friends much easier to relate to (and come to think of it, so many I've known who have been diagnosed with Asperger's were obsessed with video games so much that I wondered if too much time playing video games was what caused it...one hoped to even find a way to play test games for a living as well as avoiding any romantic entanglements with anyone...). Then you might find the company much less frustrating. IP: Logged |
Lazyscarecrow
Knowflake Posts: 1330
From: Silent Hill
Registered: Aug 2011
|
posted July 01, 2013 10:13 PM
Whoa.Hanna just asked what signs would be into virgins, so I'll just stick to that rather than go into dating woes and how "depraved and moral less" everyone else is. Anyways. Cancer and Scorpio influenced men are attracted to purity... Scorpio moreso. They love inexperience and to "show you the world" so to speak. With Cancer, I feel like it is more a complex thing. They like a woman who is both intimidating and outgoing, but then also innocent and in need of luv. Neither of them are heavily fond of a woman who can compare them to other men. Also, this does not apply to just Cancer and Scorpio men, I've also seen them go the completely opposite direction and go for a "raunchy" type. Sagittarius men are VERY traditional, more than they let on, and would heavily prefer a virgin given the ones I have met. As for a Moon sign... I'd nominate Taurus Moons. I know a lot of twenties virgins with this placement, and many of them have a religious view of sex or a very traditional one.
I think Gemini would be very into this, but for different and probably somewhat superficial reasons.
Virgo? Naaaah. Most like "experienced" females. Same with Pisces.
Leo may be drawn to this, but for more of a double standard reason. He will like your being pure just for him, but will not want you to get upset that he's had more than a bit of lady love. Of course, some of this is experience and observation, but mostly speculation. I hope you can meet a guy who can respect and accept you for you, virginity, personality and all. IP: Logged |
Odette
Knowflake Posts: 2079
From:
Registered: May 2012
|
posted July 02, 2013 05:10 AM
I think Scorpio might be!IP: Logged |
hannaramaa
Knowflake Posts: 4787
From:
Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted July 02, 2013 01:18 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Lazyscarecrow:
Whoa.Hanna just asked what signs would be into virgins, so I'll just stick to that rather than go into dating woes and how "depraved and moral-less" everyone else is. Anyways. Cancer and Scorpio influenced men are attracted to purity... Scorpio moreso. They love inexperience and to "show you the world" so to speak. With Cancer, I feel like it is more a complex thing. They like a woman who is both intimidating and outgoing, but then also innocent and in need of luv. Neither of them are heavily fond of a woman who can compare them to other men. Also, this does not apply to just Cancer and Scorpio men, I've also seen them go the completely opposite direction and go for a "raunchy" type. Sagittarius men are VERY traditional, more than they let on, and would heavily prefer a virgin given the ones I have met. As for a Moon sign... I'd nominate Taurus Moons. I know a lot of twenties virgins with this placement, and many of them have a religious view of sex or a very traditional one. I think Gemini would be very into this, but for different and probably somewhat superficial reasons. Virgo? Naaaah. Most like "experienced" females. Same with Pisces. Leo may be drawn to this, but for more of a double standard reason. He will like your being pure just for him, but will not want you to get upset that he's had more than a bit of lady love.
Thank you LazyScareCrow, and Odette! Interesting you say Taurus moons as they are some of the most sensual people around! If they do then I would say it's similar to your reasons listed for Cancer. I don't think Gemini would care one way or another as long as the personality was there, honestly. And also interesting you didn't say Aries. One would think to associate virginity to them because they were the beginning "baby" sign, here to experience everything for the first time. Even more interesting about Sag men. You're right! They are super traditional, and you'd think them being the "teacher" of the zodiac that they wouldn't mind giving a few lessons.  IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
