posted June 03, 2014 04:15 PM
Fantômas is an early last century created fictional master criminal with a flair for the decadent, surreal and anarchistic sides if nothing else. Always gets away without punishment. Also someone whose identity remains a mystery, favouring disguises all the time. Bear with me, it is actually an interesting one as an asteroid and the "birth" chart looks astounding.
Asteroid discovery chart and the chart for when the first story came out (Fantômas character "birth") coming in comments. Scroll down for background info for the non-acquainted first. Asteroid 242492 Fantomas was discovered November 10, 2004. Wiki says the centenary for Fantômas was February 10, 2011 so going by that the date it came out would've been 10.2.1911 -> date used for Fantômas chart.
My apologies if I come at this via the 1960s movie version but they're my initial touching point. The 60s version isn't as grim as the texts suggest although still the villain who always gets away with it in the end. There is a comic version that ran for some decades where Fantomas is a thief and a criminal, but also works for good as a heroic figure, all the way to saving the world and other "superhero" region things. I want to be an apologist for the figure through the later versions but the original is worse. If anything, I'm the Lady Beltham (see comments) here. Only excuse is they did use "Master lover" & "Women look him up" in the movie posters, so who am I to say no to that? http://www.mauvais-genres.com/4666-thickbox/fantomas-affiche-us- 66-jean-marais-louis-de-funes-movie-poster.jpg
Actually, my main excuse is that the chart for when the first Fantômas story came out hits me on many fronts (Valentine-Pluto conjunct my Menelaus/Horus-Moriarty? Jupiter-Fantomas-SN conjunct my Eros-Allodd? There goes that all-empowering obsessive fixation on a criminal mastermind, don't try and get in the way) - but nevermind? ;P
Perhaps it's also to some extent telling that I can't fully pin down the identity or nature of the character even here because of different versions, but that's neither here nor there for now. The 60s one wasn't horrifying unless you thought all the implications through, others may well be.
INFO:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fant%C3%B4mas
"Fantômas was introduced a few years after Arsène Lupin, another well-known thief. But whereas Lupin draws the line at murder, Fantômas has no such qualms.
He is totally ruthless, gives no mercy, and is loyal to none, not even his own children. He is a master of disguise, always appearing under an assumed identity, often that of a person whom he has murdered. Fantômas makes use of bizarre and improbable techniques in his crimes, such as plague-infested rats, giant snakes, and rooms that fill with sand.
Fantômas's background remains vague. He might be of British and/or French ancestry."
"One of the most popular characters in the history of French crime fiction, Fantômas was created in 1911 and appeared in a total of 32 volumes written by the two collaborators, then a subsequent 11 volumes written by Allain alone after Souvestre's death. The character was also the basis of various film, television, and comic book adaptations. In the history of crime fiction, he represents a transition from Gothic novel villains of the 19th century to modern-day serial killers."
"The Fantômas novels and the subsequent films were highly regarded by the French avant-garde of the day, particularly by the surrealists. Blaise Cendrars called the series "the modern Aeneid"; Guillaume Apollinaire said that "from the imaginative standpoint Fantômas is one of the richest works that exist.""
http://www.fantomas-lives.com/fanto2.htm
"Fantômas is the Lord of Terror, the Genius of Evil, the arch-criminal anti-hero of a series of 32 pre-WWI French thrillers written by Pierre Souvestre and Marcel Allain. He carries out the most appalling crimes: substituting sulfuric acid in the perfume dispensers at a Parisian department store, releasing plague-infested rats on an ocean liner, or forcing a victim to witness his own execution by placing him face-up in a guillotine. Fantômas is the master of a thousand disguises and the leader of a vast army of "apaches" (street thugs). His spies and henchmen are everywhere, spreading the seeds of chaos and terror. Fantômas is anyone and no one, everywhere and nowhere, waging an implacable war against the very bourgeois society in which he moves with such ease and assurance.
Fantômas's crimes are scenes of sublime horror... Masked bandits brandishing revolvers crash a city bus through the walls of a bank, sending money flying everywhere. Under grey Parisian skies, a horse-drawn cab gallops down the road, a wide-eyed corpse as its coachman. Fantômas strips the gilded gold from the Invalides dome each night; he poisons his victims with deadly bouquets; he crashes passenger trains and destroys steamships. And he escapes justice every time.
Considering that Fantômas was created in 1911 he is a supremely modern figure. From modern terrorists to the character of the Joker in the Heath Ledger-version Batman doing just that with a bus through the wall of a bank, this is nothing that we wouldn't be seeing around now, the hundred years later. Moriarty is far better known in arch-criminals, but he doesn't do the macabre senselessness that also seems to feature with some of Fantômas suggestions. You see why the surrealists or avant-garde figures saw value in him, chaotic or not.
One thought was wanting to check how Fantomas figures in the charts of known identity thiefs, if caught. It might feature more in the ones that aren't caught given that Fantômas himself gets away with it, but we don't hear about the ones who do. He's not a public figure despite being well-known (eventually) so I'm not sure if politicians getting away with things is a good research spot or not. Anybody getting away with murder, figuratively or otherwise, seems a good place to start for checks with charts.
Apart from the disguises and his identity not being known, there's the terror and horrifically imaginative sides of some of his crimes for a second road of possible pokes at the asteroid? The writers apparently never stopped being imaginative despite writing at an amazing pace (a story per month?), hence the Apollinaire & surrealists praise from the fictional point of view. Remember, this was before the first world war. People hadn't seen a fraction of the modern-day horrors and yet what the info up there suggests, we'd still be horrified. Possibly all the more because modern-day terrors are just as faceless as him, in another way.
No, I'm not sure where I'm going with this but I find the character or figure tremendously fascinating from several perspectives.